Suppose their was no death

For the love of the pursuit of knowledge

Moderator: Moderators

rowen
Student
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:06 am

Suppose their was no death

Post #1

Post by rowen »

Would their be anything imperfect in the world?

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Suppose their was no death

Post #31

Post by Goat »

bernee51 wrote:
Homicidal_Cherry53 wrote:
Zzyzx wrote:.
The past is a memory that does NOT exist now as a reality. It is no longer present.

I am not inclined to "interpret" the statements of others. That is the function of their disciples or promoters.
It does not exist now, but there is evidence to suggest that it does indeed exist. If time can be moved across, like any other dimension, then the past, present, and future are essentially points on a line. The fact that you currently occupy one point does not mean that the others do not exist.
Can time be moved across? Is it logically possible? How do you resolve the issue that time is a human construct and if it was not for us measuring it it would not exist. Does time exist anywhere but the noosphere?
Does width and depth exist in anything but as concepts?

Do objects change relationship to each other with or without having man observe?


If so, then time exists , the same way that depth and width exists.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
bernee51
Site Supporter
Posts: 7813
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Australia

Re: Suppose their was no death

Post #32

Post by bernee51 »

goat wrote:
bernee51 wrote:
Homicidal_Cherry53 wrote:
Zzyzx wrote:.
The past is a memory that does NOT exist now as a reality. It is no longer present.

I am not inclined to "interpret" the statements of others. That is the function of their disciples or promoters.
It does not exist now, but there is evidence to suggest that it does indeed exist. If time can be moved across, like any other dimension, then the past, present, and future are essentially points on a line. The fact that you currently occupy one point does not mean that the others do not exist.
Can time be moved across? Is it logically possible? How do you resolve the issue that time is a human construct and if it was not for us measuring it it would not exist. Does time exist anywhere but the noosphere?
Does width and depth exist in anything but as concepts?
Only to those who can manufacture concepts. A predator stalking a prey is most likely well aware of distance and depth without reflecting on it. Reflection, i.e. memories, thoughts ideas build the concepts.
goat wrote: Do objects change relationship to each other with or without having man observe
The prey doesn't know that it is a meal and the predator is no longer driven by hunger. I know that but do they?
goat wrote: If so, then time exists , the same way that depth and width exists.
Does the predator think, no need to hunt again til tomorrow? Or does is act on hunger when it next arises.
"Whatever you are totally ignorant of, assert to be the explanation of everything else"

William James quoting Dr. Hodgson

"When I see I am nothing, that is wisdom. When I see I am everything, that is love. My life is a movement between these two."

Nisargadatta Maharaj

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Suppose their was no death

Post #33

Post by Goat »

bernee51 wrote:
goat wrote:
bernee51 wrote:
Homicidal_Cherry53 wrote:
Zzyzx wrote:.
The past is a memory that does NOT exist now as a reality. It is no longer present.

I am not inclined to "interpret" the statements of others. That is the function of their disciples or promoters.
It does not exist now, but there is evidence to suggest that it does indeed exist. If time can be moved across, like any other dimension, then the past, present, and future are essentially points on a line. The fact that you currently occupy one point does not mean that the others do not exist.
Can time be moved across? Is it logically possible? How do you resolve the issue that time is a human construct and if it was not for us measuring it it would not exist. Does time exist anywhere but the noosphere?
Does width and depth exist in anything but as concepts?
Only to those who can manufacture concepts. A predator stalking a prey is most likely well aware of distance and depth without reflecting on it. Reflection, i.e. memories, thoughts ideas build the concepts.
goat wrote: Do objects change relationship to each other with or without having man observe
The prey doesn't know that it is a meal and the predator is no longer driven by hunger. I know that but do they?
goat wrote: If so, then time exists , the same way that depth and width exists.
Does the predator think, no need to hunt again til tomorrow? Or does is act on hunger when it next arises.
Do you need to reflect on a relationship for it to exist? A rock will fall towards the center of the earth, it does not matter if it if reflects or not.

The relationship exists, even if nothing is aware of it.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
bernee51
Site Supporter
Posts: 7813
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Australia

Re: Suppose their was no death

Post #34

Post by bernee51 »

goat wrote:
bernee51 wrote:
goat wrote:
bernee51 wrote:
Homicidal_Cherry53 wrote:
Zzyzx wrote:.
The past is a memory that does NOT exist now as a reality. It is no longer present.

I am not inclined to "interpret" the statements of others. That is the function of their disciples or promoters.
It does not exist now, but there is evidence to suggest that it does indeed exist. If time can be moved across, like any other dimension, then the past, present, and future are essentially points on a line. The fact that you currently occupy one point does not mean that the others do not exist.
Can time be moved across? Is it logically possible? How do you resolve the issue that time is a human construct and if it was not for us measuring it it would not exist. Does time exist anywhere but the noosphere?
Does width and depth exist in anything but as concepts?
Only to those who can manufacture concepts. A predator stalking a prey is most likely well aware of distance and depth without reflecting on it. Reflection, i.e. memories, thoughts ideas build the concepts.
goat wrote: Do objects change relationship to each other with or without having man observe
The prey doesn't know that it is a meal and the predator is no longer driven by hunger. I know that but do they?
goat wrote: If so, then time exists , the same way that depth and width exists.
Does the predator think, no need to hunt again til tomorrow? Or does is act on hunger when it next arises.
Do you need to reflect on a relationship for it to exist? A rock will fall towards the center of the earth, it does not matter if it if reflects or not.

The relationship exists, even if nothing is aware of it.
Agreed, however you extrapolated this to “therefore time exists�.

How does a rock falling to earth show “time exists�?
"Whatever you are totally ignorant of, assert to be the explanation of everything else"

William James quoting Dr. Hodgson

"When I see I am nothing, that is wisdom. When I see I am everything, that is love. My life is a movement between these two."

Nisargadatta Maharaj

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Suppose their was no death

Post #35

Post by Goat »

bernee51 wrote:
goat wrote:
bernee51 wrote:
goat wrote:
bernee51 wrote:
Homicidal_Cherry53 wrote:
Zzyzx wrote:.
The past is a memory that does NOT exist now as a reality. It is no longer present.

I am not inclined to "interpret" the statements of others. That is the function of their disciples or promoters.
It does not exist now, but there is evidence to suggest that it does indeed exist. If time can be moved across, like any other dimension, then the past, present, and future are essentially points on a line. The fact that you currently occupy one point does not mean that the others do not exist.
Can time be moved across? Is it logically possible? How do you resolve the issue that time is a human construct and if it was not for us measuring it it would not exist. Does time exist anywhere but the noosphere?
Does width and depth exist in anything but as concepts?
Only to those who can manufacture concepts. A predator stalking a prey is most likely well aware of distance and depth without reflecting on it. Reflection, i.e. memories, thoughts ideas build the concepts.
goat wrote: Do objects change relationship to each other with or without having man observe
The prey doesn't know that it is a meal and the predator is no longer driven by hunger. I know that but do they?
goat wrote: If so, then time exists , the same way that depth and width exists.
Does the predator think, no need to hunt again til tomorrow? Or does is act on hunger when it next arises.
Do you need to reflect on a relationship for it to exist? A rock will fall towards the center of the earth, it does not matter if it if reflects or not.

The relationship exists, even if nothing is aware of it.
Agreed, however you extrapolated this to “therefore time exists�.

How does a rock falling to earth show “time exists�?
Because time is the measurement of how things change in relationship between items. If there was no time, there would not be any change in relationship between things. Time and space are related...
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
bernee51
Site Supporter
Posts: 7813
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Australia

Re: Suppose their was no death

Post #36

Post by bernee51 »

goat wrote: Because time is the measurement of how things change in relationship between items. If there was no time, there would not be any change in relationship between things. Time and space are related...
Is that your tail or mine that I am chasing….?

Time is an observed phenomenon, by means of which human beings sense and record changes in the environment and in the universe.

Time exists in the noosphere.

I’ll hazard a guess and state that a rock, not having a presence in the noosphere, cannot know when it begins falling and when it stops. Time is only relevant to those who can observe and measure. It is also arbitrary and relative.

“Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour. Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute….�
"Whatever you are totally ignorant of, assert to be the explanation of everything else"

William James quoting Dr. Hodgson

"When I see I am nothing, that is wisdom. When I see I am everything, that is love. My life is a movement between these two."

Nisargadatta Maharaj

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Suppose their was no death

Post #37

Post by Goat »

bernee51 wrote:
goat wrote: Because time is the measurement of how things change in relationship between items. If there was no time, there would not be any change in relationship between things. Time and space are related...
Is that your tail or mine that I am chasing….?

Time is an observed phenomenon, by means of which human beings sense and record changes in the environment and in the universe.

Time exists in the noosphere.

I’ll hazard a guess and state that a rock, not having a presence in the noosphere, cannot know when it begins falling and when it stops. Time is only relevant to those who can observe and measure. It is also arbitrary and relative.

“Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour. Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute….�
If it wasn't for the change in relationship between different forces and matter (i.e. time), then there wouldn't be a noosphere to observe that relationship.

It all depends if you want to define time philosphically , religiously or scientifically.

I choose the scientific matter. Is there a 'universal time'. No.. it is relative. Does that mean those relationships do not exist if those relationships are not observed?? That is nonsense. Those relationships change... and thus time.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
bernee51
Site Supporter
Posts: 7813
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Australia

Re: Suppose their was no death

Post #38

Post by bernee51 »

goat wrote:
It all depends if you want to define time philosphically , religiously or scientifically.

I choose the scientific matter.
Why didn't you say so....?

8-)
goat wrote: Does that mean those relationships do not exist if those relationships are not observed?? That is nonsense. Those relationships change... and thus time.
Do they 'change' or do they 'emerge'? Is time emergent?

"In string theory, we now have overwhelming evidence that space is an emergent phenomenon. ... we should not think about the objects and events to take place on a well-defined background geometry; we should not think about space and time as basic assumptions whose existence is guaranteed before we consider anything else. ...Special relativity guarantees that if space is emergent, time must be emergent as well."
"Whatever you are totally ignorant of, assert to be the explanation of everything else"

William James quoting Dr. Hodgson

"When I see I am nothing, that is wisdom. When I see I am everything, that is love. My life is a movement between these two."

Nisargadatta Maharaj

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Suppose their was no death

Post #39

Post by Goat »

bernee51 wrote:
goat wrote:
It all depends if you want to define time philosphically , religiously or scientifically.

I choose the scientific matter.
Why didn't you say so....?

8-)
goat wrote: Does that mean those relationships do not exist if those relationships are not observed?? That is nonsense. Those relationships change... and thus time.
Do they 'change' or do they 'emerge'? Is time emergent?

"In string theory, we now have overwhelming evidence that space is an emergent phenomenon. ... we should not think about the objects and events to take place on a well-defined background geometry; we should not think about space and time as basic assumptions whose existence is guaranteed before we consider anything else. ...Special relativity guarantees that if space is emergent, time must be emergent as well."
When we have a way to test string theory that can be tested.

We do know there is a relationship between the change in distance between two objects, and their relative time flows.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
bernee51
Site Supporter
Posts: 7813
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Australia

Re: Suppose their was no death

Post #40

Post by bernee51 »

goat wrote:
bernee51 wrote:
goat wrote:
It all depends if you want to define time philosphically , religiously or scientifically.

I choose the scientific matter.
Why didn't you say so....?

8-)
goat wrote: Does that mean those relationships do not exist if those relationships are not observed?? That is nonsense. Those relationships change... and thus time.
Do they 'change' or do they 'emerge'? Is time emergent?

"In string theory, we now have overwhelming evidence that space is an emergent phenomenon. ... we should not think about the objects and events to take place on a well-defined background geometry; we should not think about space and time as basic assumptions whose existence is guaranteed before we consider anything else. ...Special relativity guarantees that if space is emergent, time must be emergent as well."
When we have a way to test string theory that can be tested.

We do know there is a relationship between the change in distance between two objects, and their relative time flows.
And we call it time.
"Whatever you are totally ignorant of, assert to be the explanation of everything else"

William James quoting Dr. Hodgson

"When I see I am nothing, that is wisdom. When I see I am everything, that is love. My life is a movement between these two."

Nisargadatta Maharaj

Post Reply