What is time?

For the love of the pursuit of knowledge

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

What is time?

Post #1

Post by McCulloch »

What is time?

Is it finite or infinite? Does it flow or is it a path? Is there a minimum possible time interval or is it continuous? What is now? Did time begin? If so, what came before time?

Does religion aid at all in answering these questions?
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

User avatar
LiamOS
Site Supporter
Posts: 3645
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:52 pm
Location: Ireland

Post #81

Post by LiamOS »

So it is your contention that time does not exist without motion?

User avatar
Icarus Fallen
Banned
Banned
Posts: 311
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 5:31 am

Post #82

Post by Icarus Fallen »

AkiThePirate wrote:So it is your contention that time does not exist without motion?
Yes, and more than that, I contend, that even though motion is contingent upon time (Nothing moves, if not the hands of time, Aki.), it is also requisite to time.
Image

User avatar
LiamOS
Site Supporter
Posts: 3645
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:52 pm
Location: Ireland

Post #83

Post by LiamOS »

Not that I think you're definitely wrong, but how've you arrived at that conclusion?

User avatar
Icarus Fallen
Banned
Banned
Posts: 311
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 5:31 am

Post #84

Post by Icarus Fallen »

Divine revelation. -- How else? :lol:
Image

User avatar
LiamOS
Site Supporter
Posts: 3645
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:52 pm
Location: Ireland

Post #85

Post by LiamOS »

No, seriously. :P

User avatar
Icarus Fallen
Banned
Banned
Posts: 311
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 5:31 am

Post #86

Post by Icarus Fallen »

Well, let's just say, it's consistent with the philosophy of a strong physicalist, such as yours truly.

Since I don't believe in the ghosts of immaterialism, I see no reason to believe that anything exists independent of the material universe; ...not even "time".
Image

User avatar
LiamOS
Site Supporter
Posts: 3645
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:52 pm
Location: Ireland

Post #87

Post by LiamOS »

No physical theory of which I'm aware requires motion or change for time to pass.

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Post #88

Post by Goat »

Icarus Fallen wrote:Well, let's just say, it's consistent with the philosophy of a strong physicalist, such as yours truly.

Since I don't believe in the ghosts of immaterialism, I see no reason to believe that anything exists independent of the material universe; ...not even "time".
The question is.. does time need space to exist, or was the 'big bang' when time became entwined with space? One theory of time is that the expansion of space time is when the arrow of time starting going in one direction.

How does time interact on the quantum level?
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
Icarus Fallen
Banned
Banned
Posts: 311
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 5:31 am

Post #89

Post by Icarus Fallen »

AkiThePirate wrote:No physical theory of which I'm aware requires motion or change for time to pass.
Hence the distinction between the Physicist and the Physicalist.

I'm a philosopher, not a scientist. As such, I can get away with promoting my own theories ...in English, as opposed to a chalkboard full of those mathematical characters.

Besides, prior to its inception, the absence of the theory of relativity had no more bearing on its truth or falsity ...than its presence in modern textbooks does today. Fact is: it's true or false, quite apart from its inception.

Appeals to authority (and implicitly to the status quo) have never much impressed me.
Image

User avatar
LiamOS
Site Supporter
Posts: 3645
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:52 pm
Location: Ireland

Post #90

Post by LiamOS »

Rather than appealing to the status quo, I'm appealing to the best knowledge of the physical universe we have; physics.
In fact, were your postulates correct we would expect time to be independent of space in both relativistic and quantum physics. Rather than that, however, it is intertwined with space, and in rare cases, almost interchangeable.

Post Reply