What is the truth about reality, and how can I know the whole truth about reality?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1020
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:56 pm
- Has thanked: 770 times
- Been thanked: 135 times
What is the truth about reality, and how can I know the whole truth about reality?
Post #1What is the truth about reality, and how can I know the whole truth about reality? I have been wondering for many years, but I am no closer to a reliable answer. Are there other universes? The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics say that there are many universes, but the scientists have not proved it to be so. Do we live in a simulation? How can we possibly know for sure? All the religions on Earth offer a different view of what is real but they contradict each other and they contradict what we know from science. Do you want to know the truth about reality or do you prefer to cling to comforting religious beliefs?
Last edited by Compassionist on Tue Dec 29, 2020 12:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1020
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:56 pm
- Has thanked: 770 times
- Been thanked: 135 times
Re: What is the truth about reality, and how can I know the whole truth about reality?
Post #11Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_c ... _narrative How is this narrative the same as what we know about the existence of reality and the existence of living things through science? Many religions have creation stories. None of them matches what we have learned through the scientific method. Please give me examples of questions that science cannot answer. What other sources of knowledge can we have apart from science?The Tanager wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 6:29 pmContradicting each other simply means they are not all correct, not that not of them are correct. I know plenty of Christians who talk about those things, as part of their religion. Christianity's Scriptures don't talk about those things, but they aren't meant to be a science book. They don't talk about those theories for or against. That's not contradiction. The Genesis account of creation does not contradict what we have discovered through science. Certainly some interpretations of the Genesis account do, but that's not the same thing.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 3:36 pmNone of the religions talk about Big Bang, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Quantum Mechanics, General Theory of Relativity, Special Theory of Relativity, Abiogenesis, Evolution, etc. The various creation stories all contradict each other and what we have discovered through science.
There are questions that science cannot answer. Not that science has tried and fail, but that are non-scientific questions. Science is very important, but it's not the only source of knowledge about reality. Religion also is about discovering truth through the examination of evidence, just different kinds of questions) oftentimes working off of scientific truths.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 3:36 pmScience is about discovering the truth through the examination of evidence. Religion is about believing lies to be truths. That's why I prefer science to religion.
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2695
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:24 pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 484 times
Re: What is the truth about reality, and how can I know the whole truth about reality?
Post #12As I see it, facts are things which are the case now but may not always have been so and may not always be so. I regard "truths" as residing in a different realm such as the philosophical, moral and, yes, even religious.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:09 pmFacts are truths. Once we know all the facts, we will become all-knowing. What do you mean by 'ultimate truth'? How is that different from facts?
If I may be so bold, we can never possibly know all facts. We experience this existence within an environment dubbed "the known universe" which, for all we know, may be but an infinitesimal soap bubble in a vastness incomprehensible to us not only in its size but also in its nature. We certainly have no way of knowing otherwise as "fact".
- The Tanager
- Savant
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 11:08 am
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: What is the truth about reality, and how can I know the whole truth about reality?
Post #13What narrative points are you talking about? There are different interpretations of the Genesis creation account. Some interpret it in ways that contradict scientific claims, but that's not the only interpretations possible. Other interpretations see the text as not making scientific claims at all, besides maybe creation ex nihilo, which coheres with traditional Big Bang cosmology and the start of the spatio-temporal universe.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:12 pmPlease see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_c ... _narrative How is this narrative the same as what we know about the existence of reality and the existence of living things through science? Many religions have creation stories. None of them matches what we have learned through the scientific method.
Logical and mathematical truths are presupposed by science. Science can't prove that the universe wasn't created 5 minutes ago. Science can't tell us if ethical truths exist, what they are, or if we should care about them. Science can't give us aesthetic truths. Science can't prove the validity of science itself. It can't tell us why there is a universe. It can't tell us what cause the spatio-temporal universe (if it began). It can't give us love, meaning, purpose.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:12 pmPlease give me examples of questions that science cannot answer.
Reason. Revelation.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:12 pmWhat other sources of knowledge can we have apart from science?
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1020
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:56 pm
- Has thanked: 770 times
- Been thanked: 135 times
Re: What is the truth about reality, and how can I know the whole truth about reality?
Post #14I agree that the observable universe is not the whole universe. Also, there may be an infinite number of other universes which we may never be able to visit or know anything about. I find my lack of omniscience and omnipotence very frustrating. How about you?Athetotheist wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:52 pmAs I see it, facts are things which are the case now but may not always have been so and may not always be so. I regard "truths" as residing in a different realm such as the philosophical, moral and, yes, even religious.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:09 pmFacts are truths. Once we know all the facts, we will become all-knowing. What do you mean by 'ultimate truth'? How is that different from facts?
If I may be so bold, we can never possibly know all facts. We experience this existence within an environment dubbed "the known universe" which, for all we know, may be but an infinitesimal soap bubble in a vastness incomprehensible to us not only in its size but also in its nature. We certainly have no way of knowing otherwise as "fact".
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1020
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:56 pm
- Has thanked: 770 times
- Been thanked: 135 times
Re: What is the truth about reality, and how can I know the whole truth about reality?
Post #15I am talking about the literal creation story which does not match what we know from science. If the Bible had said that God exists and here is the proof and if it said that this is how the universe was created 13.82 billion years ago and this is how the solar system was created, this is how abiogenesis occurred 3.8 billion years ago, this is how genetics work, etc. then that account would have matched what we know through science.The Tanager wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 8:44 pmWhat narrative points are you talking about? There are different interpretations of the Genesis creation account. Some interpret it in ways that contradict scientific claims, but that's not the only interpretations possible. Other interpretations see the text as not making scientific claims at all, besides maybe creation ex nihilo, which coheres with traditional Big Bang cosmology and the start of the spatio-temporal universe.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:12 pmPlease see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_c ... _narrative How is this narrative the same as what we know about the existence of reality and the existence of living things through science? Many religions have creation stories. None of them matches what we have learned through the scientific method.
Logical and mathematical truths are presupposed by science. Science can't prove that the universe wasn't created 5 minutes ago. Science can't tell us if ethical truths exist, what they are, or if we should care about them. Science can't give us aesthetic truths. Science can't prove the validity of science itself. It can't tell us why there is a universe. It can't tell us what cause the spatio-temporal universe (if it began). It can't give us love, meaning, purpose.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:12 pmPlease give me examples of questions that science cannot answer.
Reason. Revelation.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:12 pmWhat other sources of knowledge can we have apart from science?
Science can and has proved that our universe began 13.82 billion years ago - it is certainly not 5 minutes old.
Science is a method of observation and the testing of hypothesis. I agree that there are limits to that. As for revelation, why would an omniscient and omnipotent God use such an erroneous book as the Bible or the Quran or any other religious book to communicate with us? Why not show up and prove that He/She/It exists? Why didn't God prevent all suffering, unfairness and deaths? Doesn't that mean that God is evil (whether imaginary or real)?
- The Tanager
- Savant
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 11:08 am
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: What is the truth about reality, and how can I know the whole truth about reality?
Post #16You seem to be assuming that the account is meant to be taken as a scientific text. I don't think it was intended as a literal scientific account. It does say the spatio-temporal universe began to exist, which matches your scientific understanding. Abiogenesis is not scientific knowledge.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:51 amI am talking about the literal creation story which does not match what we know from science. If the Bible had said that God exists and here is the proof and if it said that this is how the universe was created 13.82 billion years ago and this is how the solar system was created, this is how abiogenesis occurred 3.8 billion years ago, this is how genetics work, etc. then that account would have matched what we know through science.
Science has not and cannot prove such a thing. The world could conceivably have come into existence 5 minutes ago with all our memories and the illusion of an older past built in.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:51 amScience can and has proved that our universe began 13.82 billion years ago - it is certainly not 5 minutes old.
I agree that science is a very good source of knowledge, just to be clear on that. Those books are claimed to be recordings of God showing up. Whether they are erroneous or not is a matter of history, philosophy, possibly more.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:51 amScience is a method of observation and the testing of hypothesis. I agree that there are limits to that. As for revelation, why would an omniscient and omnipotent God use such an erroneous book as the Bible or the Quran or any other religious book to communicate with us? Why not show up and prove that He/She/It exists?
I don't think it does (if using a non-question begging definition of evil).Compassionist wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:51 amWhy didn't God prevent all suffering, unfairness and deaths? Doesn't that mean that God is evil (whether imaginary or real)?
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1020
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:56 pm
- Has thanked: 770 times
- Been thanked: 135 times
Re: What is the truth about reality, and how can I know the whole truth about reality?
Post #17Just because the world could be an illusion or simulation it does not necessarily mean that it is. I have nothing more to add. Thank you for chatting with me. I wish you all the best.The Tanager wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 8:39 amYou seem to be assuming that the account is meant to be taken as a scientific text. I don't think it was intended as a literal scientific account. It does say the spatio-temporal universe began to exist, which matches your scientific understanding. Abiogenesis is not scientific knowledge.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:51 amI am talking about the literal creation story which does not match what we know from science. If the Bible had said that God exists and here is the proof and if it said that this is how the universe was created 13.82 billion years ago and this is how the solar system was created, this is how abiogenesis occurred 3.8 billion years ago, this is how genetics work, etc. then that account would have matched what we know through science.
Science has not and cannot prove such a thing. The world could conceivably have come into existence 5 minutes ago with all our memories and the illusion of an older past built in.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:51 amScience can and has proved that our universe began 13.82 billion years ago - it is certainly not 5 minutes old.
I agree that science is a very good source of knowledge, just to be clear on that. Those books are claimed to be recordings of God showing up. Whether they are erroneous or not is a matter of history, philosophy, possibly more.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:51 amScience is a method of observation and the testing of hypothesis. I agree that there are limits to that. As for revelation, why would an omniscient and omnipotent God use such an erroneous book as the Bible or the Quran or any other religious book to communicate with us? Why not show up and prove that He/She/It exists?
I don't think it does (if using a non-question begging definition of evil).Compassionist wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:51 amWhy didn't God prevent all suffering, unfairness and deaths? Doesn't that mean that God is evil (whether imaginary or real)?
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2695
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:24 pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 484 times
Re: What is the truth about reality, and how can I know the whole truth about reality?
Post #18I actually like the fact that we can't know everything. It keeps us from getting cocky and gives us room to speculate on what wonders there might be. I love a good mystery.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:43 amI agree that the observable universe is not the whole universe. Also, there may be an infinite number of other universes which we may never be able to visit or know anything about. I find my lack of omniscience and omnipotence very frustrating. How about you?
- The Tanager
- Savant
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 11:08 am
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: What is the truth about reality, and how can I know the whole truth about reality?
Post #19I completely agree and wasn't saying otherwise. I was countering the claim that science has proven the universe is not 5 minutes old. The scientific data would look exactly the same whether it's 5 minutes old with the illusion of a 13.82 billion year old past or whether that is no illusion. I think that isn't an illusion, but I'm not 100% certain.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 10:14 amJust because the world could be an illusion or simulation it does not necessarily mean that it is. I have nothing more to add. Thank you for chatting with me. I wish you all the best.
Thank you for chatting with me. I've enjoyed your thoughts, challenges, and behavior towards me. I wish you the best there is.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1020
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:56 pm
- Has thanked: 770 times
- Been thanked: 135 times
Re: What is the truth about reality, and how can I know the whole truth about reality?
Post #20You are most welcome.The Tanager wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 1:34 pmI completely agree and wasn't saying otherwise. I was countering the claim that science has proven the universe is not 5 minutes old. The scientific data would look exactly the same whether it's 5 minutes old with the illusion of a 13.82 billion year old past or whether that is no illusion. I think that isn't an illusion, but I'm not 100% certain.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sun Jan 03, 2021 10:14 amJust because the world could be an illusion or simulation it does not necessarily mean that it is. I have nothing more to add. Thank you for chatting with me. I wish you all the best.
Thank you for chatting with me. I've enjoyed your thoughts, challenges, and behavior towards me. I wish you the best there is.