Islam offends me!

[Lonely]

Does it offend you, too?

[Fatihah]

Response: Yet you can not quote any post of mine in which I say that any specific thing only one person has done is humanly impossible, thus your whole point is a baseless strawman to hide from the fact that the challenge does confirm that Muhammad is a true prophet. Adding the fact that you're still dodging the challenge, your own illogical stance is evidence ti the fact that Muhamnad has been proven to be a true prohet. Thanks for the clarification.

We didn't dodge the challenge. We already showed you were wrong. Repeatedly. And you really might want to try using spell check before you post.

Response: To the contrary, it is you, as well as others, who have been proven wrong repeatedly, and denying that your dodging the challenge. The fact that the challenge requires you conquering a nation is clear proof that you're dodging the challenge, for you rule no nation.

[ChaosBorders]

Response: To the contrary, it is you, as well as others, who have been proven wrong repeatedly, and denying that your dodging the challenge. The fact that the challenge requires you conquering a nation is clear proof that you're dodging the challenge, for you rule no nation.

I'm a college student. That I am unable to go conquer a nation proves absolutely nothing regarding Mohammad. Even if I did go conquer a nation, you'd just claim I had done so without using a book. If that's really your 'proof,' you're not using even a semblance of logic anymore. Not that you really ever were...

[Fatihah]

you can not quote any post of mine in which I say that any specific thing only one person has done is humanly impossible, thus your whole point is a baseless strawman

Really?:

It is humanly impossible for any human being to gather enough followers to conquer a nation by force......because a book said so. That alone shows that the prophethood of Muhammad is true, and that his conquest was in defense to those who opposed his newly established followers as a threat.

As for my proof of the founder of islam, that is exactly what I 've been proving to you when I asked for proof that it's humanly possible to gather enough followers to conquer a nation by force because a book says so. The logical answer which any reasonable can acknowledge is that such an act is impossible. For it is the non-muslim who claim's that this is what Muhammad did. And when you fail to present that proof, because you will, this leads to the question of how did Muhammad use the qur'an to inspire enough followers to conquer a nation when such an act is humanly impossible, then you come to learn the simple fact is because Muhammad was aided by a much higher power, who is Allah.

you have no proof that it is possible for a person to inspire enough followers to conquer a nation because a book said so. That means that the conquest of Muhammad was miraculous, for he acheived the impossible.

Those are just three.

Response: And as we can see, neither quotes say it. Once again displaying an inability to comprehend simple basic english.

[Fatihah]

Response: Now after stating your belief in cake-eating sperm (post 271), you now want me to disprove you again. Your belief in cake-eating sperm as a proof is the proof of your faulty logic.

Without using analogies.

Analogies are no way to properly disprove something.
Show which premise is faulty or show why the conclusion does not logically follow, please.

Response: Yet you've been using your belief of cake-eating sperm as an analogy to disprove something. Thus your logic is not only flawed but reeks of hypocrisy.

[Fatihah]

Response: There's the statement. Where's the proof?

Oh, it’s you!! From that other religious education forum. I recognise your catchphrase.

Response: Yes. It is me. (smiles).

[Fatihah]

Response: To the contrary, it is you, as well as others, who have been proven wrong repeatedly, and denying that your dodging the challenge. The fact that the challenge requires you conquering a nation is clear proof that you're dodging the challenge, for you rule no nation.

I'm a college student. That I am unable to go conquer a nation proves absolutely nothing regarding Mohammad. Even if I did go conquer a nation, you'd just claim I had done so without using a book. If that's really your 'proof,' you're not using even a semblance of logic anymore. Not that you really ever were...

Response: Then how unfortunate it is to watch a college student use kindergarten logic. And since you've once again failed to provide proof that my evidence is false, it's a wonder if college is even your forte.

[Jester]

Moderator Action

The civility of this discussion has clearly broken down. I see very little content being offered by any poster, and many comments.

Between that, and the lack of a debatable question in the original post, I am locking the thread.