Blasphemy - A Victimless Thought-Crime

Pointless Posts, Raves n Rants, Obscure Opinions

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Dimmesdale
Sage
Posts: 776
Joined: Mon May 29, 2017 7:19 pm
Location: Vaikuntha Dham
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 89 times

Blasphemy - A Victimless Thought-Crime

Post #1

Post by Dimmesdale »

Blasphemy is only wrong or bad or whatever - in the context of those who think it is bad.

If your world is one in which everyone around you considers it bad - and therefore you do to - then yes, blasphemy is willful evil. But again, only if you buy, hook, line and sinker - into that phony world.

If you consider that world as your own, and YOU reside there - then a stain is upon you.

But if you consider yourself free and liberated away from that world, that you have nothing invested in that world - then Blasphemy is nothing. It has no meaning. It simply serves to free you from others' false opinion of yourself.

I, for one, can no longer abide to inhabit a world where my freedom is not respected.

And so I see my blasphemy as simply me shaking off the tethers that have so long stifled me.

I leave your limited world, and enter the true and real one.....

"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough." - Albert Einstein

User avatar
Tcg
Savant
Posts: 8487
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
Location: Third Stone
Has thanked: 2141 times
Been thanked: 2293 times

Re: Blasphemy - A Victimless Thought-Crime

Post #2

Post by Tcg »

[Replying to Dimmesdale in post #1]

At least this isn't the pretentious and totally posed version where they play on a rooftop pretending to be the Beatles. In that version Bono is also wearing a shirt he copied from Larry Norman. The only worse example of their behavior is when they played Red Rocks and their manger tried to equate their appearance to one of Dylan's. Nothing original, just very poor copies of truly great musicians.


Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.

- American Atheists


Not believing isn't the same as believing not.

- wiploc


I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.

- Irvin D. Yalom

tomblj
Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2021 5:07 pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: Blasphemy - A Victimless Thought-Crime

Post #3

Post by tomblj »

Dimmesdale wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:50 pm
Afternoon. Just saw this post and thought we could riff a bit.
Pretty sure I know exactly what you're getting at but thought we could have some fun?
Blasphemy is only wrong or bad or whatever - in the context of those who think it is bad.
Fair enough. Just a statement though. Like "Blasphemy is nothing. It has no meaning." - for those who think it doesn't.
But doesn't blasphemy implicitly legitimize what it rails against? Otherwise it would truly have no meaning?
If your world is one in which everyone around you considers it bad - and therefore you do to - then yes, blasphemy is willful evil. But again, only if you buy, hook, line and sinker - into that phony world.
A bit of polemics here. Quite transparent. Who are you convincing?
If that 'world', whatever it is, is so phony, then why bother with it at all? And I'm not sure what your 'world' is... but why isn't it as phony as all the rest?
If you consider that world as your own, and YOU reside there - then a stain is upon you.
But if you consider yourself free and liberated away from that world, that you have nothing invested in that world - then Blasphemy is nothing. It has no meaning.
It simply serves to free you from others' false opinion of yourself.

A little unsure here. Are you free from others' false opinions about you or your own opinions about yourself... based on other people's opinions?
I, for one, can no longer abide to inhabit a world where my freedom is not respected.
What freedom? Freedom to do/say what? To offend people? Is respect earned or deserved?
And so I see my blasphemy as simply me shaking off the tethers that have so long stifled me.

Perhaps there's a better way.
I leave your limited world, and enter the true and real one.....
Hilarious. Sounds like a manifesto.




User avatar
Dimmesdale
Sage
Posts: 776
Joined: Mon May 29, 2017 7:19 pm
Location: Vaikuntha Dham
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 89 times

Re: Blasphemy - A Victimless Thought-Crime

Post #4

Post by Dimmesdale »

tomblj wrote: Mon Dec 27, 2021 11:28 pm
Afternoon. Just saw this post and thought we could riff a bit.
Pretty sure I know exactly what you're getting at but thought we could have some fun?
I myself don't even remember what exactly I was getting at in this post. It's been a while. However, looking back, it seems to me my views deserve an upgrade.
tomblj wrote: Mon Dec 27, 2021 11:28 pm But doesn't blasphemy implicitly legitimize what it rails against? Otherwise it would truly have no meaning?
True. If blasphemy is directed against what is good, or pure, or holy, then that rather undercuts its whole project of denigration. It might however be directed at things which only appear good, or pure, or holy -- but which carry along with those connotations other, hidden meanings.

I'm reminded of that one guy (decades ago probably, I don't remember the exact name...) who beheaded that statue of the Virgin Mary because he hated women. I suppose he found that statue to be very irate, since it evoked certain sentiments in him that he couldn't bear. The word 'phony' comes to mind -- in that sometimes our most vaunted public relics and symbols belie what they are supposed to represent. I don't blame this guy if he had a bad mother, or some other experience with women that spurred him to do what he did -- but now I feel that his anger was misdirected. Not everyone feels like him. The public square doesn't deserve to be desecrated because of one person's private disinheritance of the virtues of femininity.

tomblj wrote: Mon Dec 27, 2021 11:28 pm If that 'world', whatever it is, is so phony, then why bother with it at all? And I'm not sure what your 'world' is... but why isn't it as phony as all the rest?
I think the blasphemer is admittedly a religious person. I think if someone really invests any amount of time in a private world, then that world becomes him, to one extent or another.

I have come to terms that I do have my own world. A world of pure religion. I have myself come to terms with the fact that a True devotee of Truth, is not interested in blaspheming Anyone.
tomblj wrote: Mon Dec 27, 2021 11:28 pmPerhaps there's a better way.
I think so.
tomblj wrote: Mon Dec 27, 2021 11:28 pm Hilarious. Sounds like a manifesto.
Whatever 'manifesto' I am following now, is not of my making, but has been conferred upon me.
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough." - Albert Einstein

Post Reply