Hypothetically speaking, and assuming God exists:
If you were demanded- by God - to kill an innocent child, would you do it?
Christians! : What would you do if....
Moderator: Moderators
- VermilionUK
- Scholar
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:48 pm
- Location: West-Midlands, United Kingdom
Christians! : What would you do if....
Post #1When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth
- Sherlock Holmes -
- Sherlock Holmes -
- VermilionUK
- Scholar
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:48 pm
- Location: West-Midlands, United Kingdom
Post #31
Pastor4Jesus wrote:No you said it was God the creator of the universe that asked me to whack the kid. The everlasting life isn't a reward, its the order of things. If God said the child was going to go to a kind of hell and he wanted to kill the child for say the pleasure of killing I would have to decline because it would not be the God that I worship.VermilionUK wrote:Why not? Because your life is infinately valuable. In killing yourself, you would be throwing away your physical life, with the assumption of an instant heavely reward.Pastor4Jesus wrote:The child would be history if a true creator of the universe demanded his death, however his death would simply be another level of existence. I would kill myself if somehow I knew it was God asking me to do it, why not?
P4JC
What if God didn't suggest that he would give you a reward/or the child a reward? Would you still do it? The criteria in the OP suggests nothing of a heavenly reward.
P4JC
So you would be killing the child with the expectation of a heavenly afterlife, because "its the order of things"? Would you not say such a mind-set was perhaps selfish? If not, why not?Pastor4Jesus wrote:The everlasting life isn't a reward, its the order of things
If the afterlife in heaven is not a "reward", why else would you kill the child, if not to improve your chances of entry to heaven?
How do you know the character of the God you worship? From the fact that God permits people to die from natural diseases (which, considering God made everything in the natural world - would be his creation), one could conclude that God does enjoy death.Pastor4Jesus wrote:If God said the child was going to go to a kind of hell and he wanted to kill the child for say the pleasure of killing I would have to decline because it would not be the God that I worship.
All my OP stated was "Hypothetically speaking, and assuming God exists:
If you were demanded- by God - to kill an innocent child, would you do it?".
God states nothing, all he/He demands is the death of the child - no reason, explanation or consequence for your actions is given.
When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth
- Sherlock Holmes -
- Sherlock Holmes -
-
- Sage
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:41 am
- Location: Far East TN Mountains
Post #32
What a comical visualization that statement provoked! I am sure God is shaking in his cosmic Nikes.joeyknuccione wrote:Worship or not, any god that asks me to kill a child will meet my wrath.
~Anyway~
Many children met their death in war when they were attempting to kill other soldiers. So there are times that I would kill a child even without God telling me to, say if he has a AK 47 in his little hands blasting away at me....sad and regrettable, but true.
Additionally abortion supporters help kill millions of would be infants, to me that is even more appalling than above (killing in self defense).
P4JC
When Selfish Gene author Richard Dawkins challenged physicist John Barrow on his formulation of the constants of nature at last summer Templeton-Cambridge Journalism Fellowship lectures, Barrow laughed and said, “You have a problem with these ideas, Richard, because you aren''t really a scientist. You''re a biologist ! (Woo Hoo you go Barrow!)
- VermilionUK
- Scholar
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:48 pm
- Location: West-Midlands, United Kingdom
Post #33
What does that have to do with the question?Pastor4Jesus wrote: Many children met their death in war when they were attempting to kill other soldiers. So there are times that I would kill a child even without God telling me to, say if he has a AK 47 in his little hands blasting away at me....sad and regrettable, but true.
I'll have to disagree there. In many cases, it's a case of the parents choosing an abortion due to them not being fit for parenthood.Pastor4Jesus wrote: Additionally abortion supporters help kill millions of would be infants, to me that is even more appalling than above (killing in self defense).
P4JC
"Then why did they have sex?" I hear you ask. Human nature and desire is the answer.
Other cases range from the would-be child having a painful life/poor quality of life due to disability or disease which would strongly prevent the child living a happy life - In those cases, I'd say it shows mercy, as it spares the would-be child a life of pain.
And then there's the rape victims, under-age mothers etc etc.
If we didn't have abortion, then there'd be a lot of young children with an incredibly poor quality of life.
Anyway, that's getting off topic.
When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth
- Sherlock Holmes -
- Sherlock Holmes -
-
- Sage
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:41 am
- Location: Far East TN Mountains
Post #34
What does it have to do with this question? >>> "Worship or not, any god that asks me to kill a child will meet my wrath." I was opining that killing a child is excusable if he is trying to kill you.
P4JC
Well it could be worse. They could of been aborted. Or ask them with the disabilities etc, how many of them want to die now? It would be more humane and ethical, because at least death would be their decision.If we didn't have abortion, then there'd be a lot of young children with an incredibly poor quality of life.
P4JC
When Selfish Gene author Richard Dawkins challenged physicist John Barrow on his formulation of the constants of nature at last summer Templeton-Cambridge Journalism Fellowship lectures, Barrow laughed and said, “You have a problem with these ideas, Richard, because you aren''t really a scientist. You''re a biologist ! (Woo Hoo you go Barrow!)
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2572 times
Post #35
From Post 31:
I try not to add any more conditions than the OP applies, as I see such to be a bit of a dodge or even strawman.
Point being I'd rather fight an infinitely powerful entity I couldn't possibly defeat than to harm an innocent child. I do note that I didn't specifically mention the innocent part in the original.Pastor4Jesus wrote:What a comical visualization that statement provoked! I am sure God is shaking in his cosmic Nikes.joeyknuccione wrote: Worship or not, any god that asks me to kill a child will meet my wrath.
I try not to add any more conditions than the OP applies, as I see such to be a bit of a dodge or even strawman.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
-
- Sage
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:41 am
- Location: Far East TN Mountains
Post #36
Well on a purely theoretical thing yes most of us would defend a child. Of course if God was evil I would be worshiping the other guy.joeyknuccione wrote:From Post 31:
Point being I'd rather fight an infinitely powerful entity I couldn't possibly defeat than to harm an innocent child. I do note that I didn't specifically mention the innocent part in the original.Pastor4Jesus wrote:What a comical visualization that statement provoked! I am sure God is shaking in his cosmic Nikes.joeyknuccione wrote: Worship or not, any god that asks me to kill a child will meet my wrath.
I try not to add any more conditions than the OP applies, as I see such to be a bit of a dodge or even strawman.
P4JC
When Selfish Gene author Richard Dawkins challenged physicist John Barrow on his formulation of the constants of nature at last summer Templeton-Cambridge Journalism Fellowship lectures, Barrow laughed and said, “You have a problem with these ideas, Richard, because you aren''t really a scientist. You''re a biologist ! (Woo Hoo you go Barrow!)
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Post #37
How could you tell the difference?Pastor4Jesus wrote:Of course if God was evil I would be worshiping the other guy.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
-
- Sage
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:41 am
- Location: Far East TN Mountains
Post #38
Being a theoretical question if the child was innocent and that entails all the nuances of innocence that are theoretically possible, God would be evil to harm it according to the common definition of good and evil and God.McCulloch wrote:How could you tell the difference?Pastor4Jesus wrote:Of course if God was evil I would be worshiping the other guy.
P4JC
When Selfish Gene author Richard Dawkins challenged physicist John Barrow on his formulation of the constants of nature at last summer Templeton-Cambridge Journalism Fellowship lectures, Barrow laughed and said, “You have a problem with these ideas, Richard, because you aren''t really a scientist. You''re a biologist ! (Woo Hoo you go Barrow!)
- VermilionUK
- Scholar
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:48 pm
- Location: West-Midlands, United Kingdom
Post #39
What about Abraham and Isaac? Sure, God didn't have the child killed, but I'd say it's pretty evil to allow a father to prepare to sacrifice his son, only to be stopped at the last minute. Or is that the action of a loving God?Pastor4Jesus wrote:Being a theoretical question if the child was innocent and that entails all the nuances of innocence that are theoretically possible, God would be evil to harm it according to the common definition of good and evil and God.McCulloch wrote:How could you tell the difference?Pastor4Jesus wrote:Of course if God was evil I would be worshiping the other guy.
P4JC
It's not too far off the scenario in the OP
-
- Sage
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:41 am
- Location: Far East TN Mountains
Post #40
Well personally I think its a huge difference. God wanted Abraham to prove his faith. He did and the rest is history. I agree its a horrific situation and one that fairly terrified me as a child. There are many stories and verses of scripture that I question as being parable or truth or maybe has a translational error, and its why I switched to theology in school. I was fascinated with religion. However I wish now that I had simply switched to archeology and geology. Seminary was too structured etc.VermilionUK wrote:What about Abraham and Isaac? Sure, God didn't have the child killed, but I'd say it's pretty evil to allow a father to prepare to sacrifice his son, only to be stopped at the last minute. Or is that the action of a loving God?Pastor4Jesus wrote:Being a theoretical question if the child was innocent and that entails all the nuances of innocence that are theoretically possible, God would be evil to harm it according to the common definition of good and evil and God.McCulloch wrote:How could you tell the difference?Pastor4Jesus wrote:Of course if God was evil I would be worshiping the other guy.
P4JC
It's not too far off the scenario in the OP
P4JC
When Selfish Gene author Richard Dawkins challenged physicist John Barrow on his formulation of the constants of nature at last summer Templeton-Cambridge Journalism Fellowship lectures, Barrow laughed and said, “You have a problem with these ideas, Richard, because you aren''t really a scientist. You''re a biologist ! (Woo Hoo you go Barrow!)