Leading or Opposing, which is more Effective?

To solve world problems

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply

Which is more effective?

Positive leadership and encouragement
1
33%
Protest against opposition
0
No votes
Doing both is most effective
2
67%
 
Total votes: 3

User avatar
Divine Insight
Savant
Posts: 18080
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: Here & Now
Been thanked: 15 times

Leading or Opposing, which is more Effective?

Post #1

Post by Divine Insight »

Questions for Putting Our Heads Together:

Which is more effective?:

1. Creating a movement that positively leads to, and supports, the desired result.

OR

2. Creating a movement that opposes and/or protests against things that appear to be blocking a desired result.

~~~~~

Also, Is it even possible to accomplish #1 without necessarily appealing to, or employing #2?

User avatar
Kuan
Site Supporter
Posts: 1806
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:21 am
Location: Rexburg, the Frozen Wasteland
Contact:

Post #2

Post by Kuan »

I voted 1, for one reason. Its obvious the most effective way would be to do both. But if I had to choose one, the most effective IMO is number 1. An optimist is better than a pessimist.

But is it possible to do one without the other?

The world may never know....
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
- Voltaire

Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.

User avatar
Nilloc James
Site Supporter
Posts: 1696
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:53 am
Location: Canada

Post #3

Post by Nilloc James »

Some of the most successful movements have employed either or both. I dont know if either is objectively better, but it may all depend on context.

Post Reply