A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

User avatar
help3434
Guru
Posts: 1508
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: United States
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Post #601

Post by help3434 »

[Replying to post 594 by Nickman]

I think that you are overlooking that theists believe that God created the universe. How could an omniscient God create the universe without preplanning everything that would happen in it?

User avatar
Nickman
Site Supporter
Posts: 5443
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Idaho
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #602

Post by Nickman »

help3434 wrote: [Replying to post 594 by Nickman]

I think that you are overlooking that theists believe that God created the universe. How could an omniscient God create the universe without preplanning everything that would happen in it?
The question was about omniscience. Christianity doesn't have a monopoly on this concept. My argument is about omniscience without Christianity.

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #603

Post by JohnA »

Nickman wrote:
JohnA wrote:
You have my reply on the Black Jack counting thing.
You have my reply on the 'hinder free will' thing.
I did not know you defined your own new god here to work around this issue. Am debating the with reference to the bible god. Can toy identify your god, define him and his omniscience?
So, do you agree then that the bible god's omniscience contradicts human free-will?
I have already said that the biblical God is illogical. My imaginary God concept does not. You are stuck on the Biblical God concept. I am not. Omniscience with my God is not illogical. That sounds so weird coming from an atheist.
Nick, am I correct in saying you rather invent a new god than to agree with 'my' omniscience/free-will argument?

User avatar
help3434
Guru
Posts: 1508
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: United States
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Post #604

Post by help3434 »

[Replying to Nickman]

When did I say anything about Christianity?

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #605

Post by ttruscott »

Nickman wrote:
...

I have explained why free will is not negated by simple knowledge of events that will transpire. Danmark and I have attacked this issue from two different points of view. Ill let him explain his again. For me there is no contradiction. We all have free will to an extent, but if someone were to know everything I would do before I did it, doesn't mean that they were imposing on my free will. For them, my entire life would have been manifest to them. For me, I am still here in time making my decisions every day, i.e. free will. They just see what decisions I made ahead of time. It is quite a simple concept.
As a Christian I cannot argue against this logic as far as it goes but it is flawed in practice.
1. It means GOD knew who would be damned and created them anyway. I must reject this so I am forced to posit that

GOD is omniscient even if there are some things HE chose not to know.

2. It is fairly clear that scripture asserts we have no free will here on earth but since I believe in the moral necessity of free will to keep GOD at arm's length from the creation of evil and to make the creature truly guilty of his evil choices, there must have been a time of true free will, ergo,

I posit that pre-earth in sheol we all had our time of true free will and self created our eternal relationships with YHWH then.

Peace, Ted
Last edited by ttruscott on Sun Oct 27, 2013 1:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #606

Post by ttruscott »

help3434 wrote: [Replying to post 594 by Nickman]

I think that you are overlooking that theists believe that God created the universe. How could an omniscient God create the universe without preplanning everything that would happen in it?
If HIS omniscience covered only all reality and all possibility for everything HE decreed to be created and to happen is HE omniscient in your view?

But what if there was something created that HE did not decree into reality, that HE let HIS creatures create? IF HE did not create the results of their true free will decisions but let them truly choose which possibility they would follow and bring into reality, does it still fit omniscience?

Orthodox omniscience says not, all is only all (unless it isn't, eh?). BUT Acts 15:18 'Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world.' seems to imply HE (only) knows about HIS own works as reality, leaving it open for HIM to allow works by HIS creatures that HE does not know before their creation by the creature into reality.

Going through the verse list of what HE knows and how, and this principle holds...if HE did not decree its creation (ie, so it was HIS work) it is not specifically said HE knows it beforehand.

Peace, Ted
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

User avatar
Nickman
Site Supporter
Posts: 5443
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Idaho
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #607

Post by Nickman »

JohnA wrote:
Nickman wrote:
JohnA wrote:
You have my reply on the Black Jack counting thing.
You have my reply on the 'hinder free will' thing.
I did not know you defined your own new god here to work around this issue. Am debating the with reference to the bible god. Can toy identify your god, define him and his omniscience?
So, do you agree then that the bible god's omniscience contradicts human free-will?
I have already said that the biblical God is illogical. My imaginary God concept does not. You are stuck on the Biblical God concept. I am not. Omniscience with my God is not illogical. That sounds so weird coming from an atheist.
Nick, am I correct in saying you rather invent a new god than to agree with 'my' omniscience/free-will argument?
The debate is about omniscience which is extremely offtopic. I was debating omniscience without the constraints of Christianity.

User avatar
Nickman
Site Supporter
Posts: 5443
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Idaho
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #608

Post by Nickman »

ttruscott wrote:
Nickman wrote:
...

I have explained why free will is not negated by simple knowledge of events that will transpire. Danmark and I have attacked this issue from two different points of view. Ill let him explain his again. For me there is no contradiction. We all have free will to an extent, but if someone were to know everything I would do before I did it, doesn't mean that they were imposing on my free will. For them, my entire life would have been manifest to them. For me, I am still here in time making my decisions every day, i.e. free will. They just see what decisions I made ahead of time. It is quite a simple concept.
As a Christian I cannot argue against this logic as far as it goes but it is flawed in practice.
1. It means GOD knew who would be damned and created them anyway. I must reject this so I am forced to posit that

GOD is omniscient even if there are some things HE chose not to know.

2. It is fairly clear that scripture asserts we have no free will here on earth but since I believe in the moral necessity of free will to keep GOD at arm's length from the creation of evil and to make the creature truly guilty of his evil choices, there must have been a time of true free will, ergo,

I posit that pre-earth in sheol we all had our time of true free will and self created our eternal relationships with YHWH then.

Peace, Ted
Well that is a problem once you add benevolence into the equation. Omniscience on its own is not though.

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #609

Post by JohnA »

[Replying to post 602 by ttruscott]

Interesting. So, you reckon that this god did not create humans. Lol. All reverence in the bible about him creating Adam and Eve are wrong then. Well you have to accept that to explain human free will by an all knowing god.

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #610

Post by JohnA »

Nickman wrote:
JohnA wrote:
Nickman wrote:
JohnA wrote:
You have my reply on the Black Jack counting thing.
You have my reply on the 'hinder free will' thing.
I did not know you defined your own new god here to work around this issue. Am debating the with reference to the bible god. Can toy identify your god, define him and his omniscience?
So, do you agree then that the bible god's omniscience contradicts human free-will?
I have already said that the biblical God is illogical. My imaginary God concept does not. You are stuck on the Biblical God concept. I am not. Omniscience with my God is not illogical. That sounds so weird coming from an atheist.
Nick, am I correct in saying you rather invent a new god than to agree with 'my' omniscience/free-will argument?
The debate is about omniscience which is extremely offtopic. I was debating omniscience without the constraints of Christianity.
You did not answer my question Nick. Why is that?
Nor did you answer my previous questions to define your god. And the card counting and 'hinderence'.

And yes, you are off topic here if you are not debating about the Christian god. Have you read the topic on the thread?

Omniscience is just that, and either your god has or our not. It does not change the argument.

No, can you please start debating. You have my questions, let's keep this honest. No more running away like Danmark.

Post Reply