The Divine Name in the New Testament with proof

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Laurelix
Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2020 5:45 pm

The Divine Name in the New Testament with proof

Post #1

Post by Laurelix »

Before we get to the main proof let’s actually look at wether there were any mentions that the divine name was written in the Christian Greek Scriptures.
The Tosefta, a written collection of oral laws completed by about 300 C.E., says with regard to Christian writings that were burned on the Sabbath: “The books of the Evangelists and the books of the minim [thought to be Jewish Christians] they do not save from a fire. But they are allowed to burn where they are, . . . they and the references to the Divine Name which are in them.� This same source quotes Rabbi Yosé the Galilean, who lived at the beginning of the second century C.E., as saying that on other days of the week “one cuts out the references to the Divine Name which are in them [the Christian writings] and stores them away, and the rest burns.� Thus, there is strong evidence that the Jews living in the second century C.E. believed that Christians used The Divine name in their writings.

After all the NT does quote a lot of the OT which contained Yahweh.

Now to the real discovery the not even the WatchTower Society knows about. With this new finding I went through the New World Translation and in their New Testament the divine name is over spammed. They have roughly 234 tines when it should appear only around 150 times. So in many passages it appeared where it originally wasn’t and then it’s missing the divine name in certain places like Ephesians 6:1,4,10,21 so it’s missing the divine there but then in verse 7 where it should be Lord, they have the divine name there.

How do I know this? Well When the practice took place of replacing the divine name with Kyrios in OT, the same rule was later applied for NT also. The original writings that wore out and had to be copied no longer exist with us which had the divine name but only the copies are available to us which already applied the removal of the divine name and using Kyrios instead. This is why Heresies like Seballianism and of similar things started erupting in late 2nd and 3rd century and even 4th. The removal of the divine name caused chaos because you have 2 Lords being called the same.

Let’s Take a Look at the Interlinear for Luke 3:4 which is quoting the OT which has Yahweh in the Passage.

γέγ�απται �ν βίβλῳ λόγων Ἠσαίου τοῦ π�οφήτου Φωνὴ Voice βοῶντος �ν τῇ ��ήμῳ Ἑτοιμάσατε τὴν �δὸν Κυ�ίου, ε�θείας ποιεῖτε τὰς τ�ίβους α�τοῦ.

as it has been written in book of words of Isaiah the prophet Voice of calling out in the desolate [place] Make YOU ready the way, of Lord, straight be YOU making the roads.

In Greek you have 2 types of sentences. Some sentences have no articles at all this nothing has to have an article. But if a sentence has an article everything such as title must have an article before it but not if it’s a name.

So let’s look closely...

“as it has been written in book of words of Isaiah� - No Article Before Name

“the prophet Voice of calling out in the desolate [place] Make YOU ready the way,� —- Articles being used without fail before Prophet (title), desolate, way

“of Lord, straight be YOU making the roads.� - We see still see article before roads but there is an error here, there is no article before Lord (Title) in an sentence which has articles... even in the Interlinear version on bible hub they had to insert (the) in brackets because it’s missing.

However if we were to insert the Divine Name there, the grammatical error would be fixed because articles do not go before before a name. In this same manner if there is an article before Kyrios you know that in that place the divine name wasn’t used. In sentences which do not use articles you can’t identify this grammatical issue. When the Divine Name was tampered with and replaced it left these traces behind. This never pc ours when Lord is used for Jesus but only in places where Yahweh has been substituted.

Using this Same rule let’s see what Luke 2:22-24 would look like
“Also, when the time came for purifying them according to the Law of Moses, they brought him up to Jerusalem to present him to the LORD, just as it is written in Jehovah’s Law: “Every firstborn male must be called holy to the LORD.� And they offered a sacrifice according to what is said in the Law of Jehovah: “a pair of turtledoves or two young pigeons.�

User avatar
theQuestion
Banned
Banned
Posts: 184
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2021 1:51 am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: The Divine Name in the New Testament with proof

Post #11

Post by theQuestion »

It is no longer a Mystery (altho it never was to REAL Chrstians)~

https://religionnews.com/2018/01/25/the ... nuscripts/
You MUST worship with spirit & TRUTH!- Jesus

Post Reply