He often emphasizes what he sees as the "dual" meanings of scripture, where we have a material, physical statement or prophecy but which has a spiritual meaning too.
For example this is his answer to a question someone asked about Armageddon being a "real" battle.
What is the Spiritual Significance of Armageddon?
In answering he quotes:
Which strikes me as insightful, that is the statement literally means that understanding of spiritual things is made understandable in scripture, by reference to material, made things.Rom 1:20 wrote:For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.
So is there anything Vinson has wrong here? for examples are any of the answers to questions wrong? misguided?