I have spent a lot of time discussing theology in Christian forums.
The central critical issue in theology is final authority.
Catholics believe their church is the final authority.
Baptist believe scripture is the final authority,
so final canonization becomes the issue.
I want to start by saying I sincerity appreciate this forum site !
I'd like to make a couple critical statement.
Everyone, even Christians, have the exact same issues with the God of the Holy Bible.
Dr. Peter Ruckman, Ph.D. is the most prolific author of bible apologetics/polemics of all time.
I have spent 30 years reading his books, watching his videos
and personally conferenced with him over the years.
Even Dr. Ruckman openly stated that he does not like the presentation of eternal damnation in the Holy Bible.
I spent time with Dr. Paul Kurtz, the co-author of the humanists manifesto II,
he also does not like the presentation of eternal damnation in the Holy Bible.
This time in your forum is important to me !
.
Separating Facts and Feelings with Language .
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Student
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:05 pm
-
- Student
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:05 pm
Re: Separating Facts and Feelings with Language .
Post #2[Replying to post 1 by Makahiya2028]
Most of humanity believe there is a God (monotheism) or gods (polytheism).
Obviously there are far more doctoral dissertations by theists than agnostics
and atheists (against the idea of God).
I've read some of all three. We can not go through any of them online,
but I do want to carefully consider what is called in academic literature
"Problems in Theology" .
I heard a man say, " If God is love, he has a funny way of showing it. "
The single biggest issue is hell .
.
Most of humanity believe there is a God (monotheism) or gods (polytheism).
Obviously there are far more doctoral dissertations by theists than agnostics
and atheists (against the idea of God).
I've read some of all three. We can not go through any of them online,
but I do want to carefully consider what is called in academic literature
"Problems in Theology" .
I heard a man say, " If God is love, he has a funny way of showing it. "
The single biggest issue is hell .
.
Last edited by Makahiya2028 on Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2572 times
Post #3
From the OP:
Yes, no, maybe, Obama's coming for our guns.
Please insert appropriate answer for whatever it is we're debating.
Yes, no, maybe, Obama's coming for our guns.
Please insert appropriate answer for whatever it is we're debating.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
-
- Student
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:05 pm
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2572 times
-
- Student
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:05 pm
- Danmark
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 12697
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:58 am
- Location: Seattle
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #7
Moderator Action
Topic moved to a discussion forum. There was no question for debate. Instead there was a declaration that this would be discussion. Please read 'Tips for starting a topic,' specifically "Some tips on starting a new thread for debate:
1. Make sure that it is a debate topic, rather than a discussion topic.
If it is a discussion topic, then it will be moved to a discussion subforum. A debate topic has at least two positions on a topic where a side argues for their own position and against other positions. A discussion topic generally has personal opinions and doesn't have two sides on the issue.
______________
Moderator actions indicate that a thread/post has been locked, moved, merged, or split.
Topic moved to a discussion forum. There was no question for debate. Instead there was a declaration that this would be discussion. Please read 'Tips for starting a topic,' specifically "Some tips on starting a new thread for debate:
1. Make sure that it is a debate topic, rather than a discussion topic.
If it is a discussion topic, then it will be moved to a discussion subforum. A debate topic has at least two positions on a topic where a side argues for their own position and against other positions. A discussion topic generally has personal opinions and doesn't have two sides on the issue.
______________
Moderator actions indicate that a thread/post has been locked, moved, merged, or split.
-
- Student
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:05 pm
Re: Separating Facts and Feelings with Language .
Post #9[Replying to post 1 by Makahiya2028]
Dear Mak,
The "bible" is not holy. The canon of the bible was formalized by a mother of harlots, who sits on the beast (empire of Rome as 5th thru 8th head of the beast). Your basic premise is wrong. Whether the Roman church and her pope, supposed heir of Petros, is the "rock" the church is built on, or her canon, which consists of the good seed, mixed with the seed of the evil one, the tares, is a false comparison.
The rock, petra, the church is built on is the Spirit of Revelation (Mt 16:17), which is exemplified by the "testimony of Yeshua" (Revelation 19:10). The only firm foundation is to heed the testimony of Yeshua (Mt 7:26). Those that heed Petros, the small stone, also a term applied to Simon Bar Jonas, rely on a small stone (petros), which is like unto building a house on sand, and when the rains and wind come, the house will fall (Mt 7:27). Per Isaiah 22:25, all who hang onto this head of household, who supposedly holds the keys of David, will be "cut off".
Dear Mak,
The "bible" is not holy. The canon of the bible was formalized by a mother of harlots, who sits on the beast (empire of Rome as 5th thru 8th head of the beast). Your basic premise is wrong. Whether the Roman church and her pope, supposed heir of Petros, is the "rock" the church is built on, or her canon, which consists of the good seed, mixed with the seed of the evil one, the tares, is a false comparison.
The rock, petra, the church is built on is the Spirit of Revelation (Mt 16:17), which is exemplified by the "testimony of Yeshua" (Revelation 19:10). The only firm foundation is to heed the testimony of Yeshua (Mt 7:26). Those that heed Petros, the small stone, also a term applied to Simon Bar Jonas, rely on a small stone (petros), which is like unto building a house on sand, and when the rains and wind come, the house will fall (Mt 7:27). Per Isaiah 22:25, all who hang onto this head of household, who supposedly holds the keys of David, will be "cut off".
- Divine Insight
- Savant
- Posts: 18070
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:59 pm
- Location: Here & Now
- Been thanked: 19 times
Post #10
Here, I started a thread for you Makahiya:
What is the Message of the Holy Bible?
I've already posted my answer to this question. Perhaps you can type in your answer.
Keep in mind that the thread I started is in "General Chat". So you don't need to "debate" my position in that thread. Just state your own position.
If you would like to debate my position we can do that in another thread.
[center]
Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]
Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]