For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.
Matthew 5:18
The Prophet Jesus peace be upon him,
came to complete the law of the ancient prophets
Without decrease or increase
The remaining authentic verses in the Old Testament cannot be omitted
Why such variance in viewpoints? To begin with, different theological camps disagree on which books should be included in the Bible. One camp’s apocrypha is another’s scripture. Secondly, even among those books that have been canonized, the many variant source texts lack uniformity. This lack of uniformity is so ubiquitous that The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible states, “It is safe to say that there is not one sentence in the NT in which the MS [manuscript] tradition is wholly uniform.”[2]
Not one sentence? We can’t trust a single sentence of the Bible? Hard to believe.
Maybe
The fact is that there are over 5700 Greek manuscripts of all or part of the New Testament.[3] Furthermore, “no two of these manuscripts are exactly alike in all their particulars…. And some of these differences are significant.”[4] Factor in roughly ten thousand manuscripts of the Latin Vulgate, add the many other ancient variants (i.e., Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, Georgian, Ethiopic, Nubian, Gothic, Slavonic), and what do we have?
A lot of manuscripts
A lot of manuscripts that fail to correspond in places and not infrequently contradict one another. Scholars estimate the number of manuscript variants in the hundreds of thousands, some estimating as high as 400,000.[5] In Bart D. Ehrman’s now famous words, “Possibly it is easiest to put the matter in comparative terms: there are more differences in our manuscripts than there are words in the New Testament.”[6]
How did this happen?
Poor record keeping. Dishonesty. Incompetence. Doctrinal prejudice. Take your pick.
None of the original manuscripts have survived from the early Christian period.[7]/[8] The most ancient complete manuscripts (Vatican MS. No. 1209 and the Sinaitic Syriac Codex) date from the fourth century, three hundred years after Jesus’ ministry. But the originals? Lost. And the copies of the originals? Also lost. Our most ancient manuscripts, in other words, are copies of the copies of the copies of nobody-knows-just-how-many copies of the originals.
No wonder they differ
In the best of hands, copying errors would be no surprise. However, New Testament manuscripts were not in the best of hands. During the period of Christian origins, scribes were untrained, unreliable, incompetent, and in some cases illiterate.[9] Those who were visually impaired could have made errors with look-alike letters and words, while those who were hearing-impaired may have erred in recording scripture as it was read aloud. Frequently scribes were overworked, and hence inclined to the errors that accompany fatigue.
In the words of Metzger and Ehrman, “Since most, if not all, of them [the scribes] would have been amateurs in the art of copying, a relatively large number of mistakes no doubt crept into their texts as they reproduced them.”[10] Worse yet, some scribes allowed doctrinal prejudice to influence their transmission of scripture.[11] As Ehrman states, “The scribes who copied the texts changed them.”[12] More specifically, “The number of deliberate alterations made in the interest of doctrine is difficult to assess.”[13] And even more specifically, “In the technical parlance of textual criticism—which I retain for its significant ironies—these scribes ‘corrupted’ their texts for theological reasons.”[14]
Errors were introduced in the form of additions, deletions, substitutions and modifications, most commonly of words or lines, but occasionally of entire verses.[15] [16] In fact, “numerous changes and accretions came into the text,”[17] with the result that “all known witnesses of the New Testament are to a greater or lesser extent mixed texts, and even several of the earliest manuscripts are not free from egregious errors.”[18]
In Misquoting Jesus, Ehrman presents persuasive evidence that the story of the woman taken in adultery (John 7:53-8:12) and the last twelve verses of Mark were not in the original gospels, but added by later scribes.[19] Furthermore, these examples “represent just two out of thousands of places in which the manuscripts of the New Testament came to be changed by scribes.”[20]
In fact, entire books of the Bible were forged.[21] This doesn’t mean their content is necessarily wrong, but it certainly doesn’t mean it’s right. So which books were forged? Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, 1 and 2 Peter, and Jude—a whopping nine of the twenty-seven New Testament books and epistles—are to one degree or another suspect.[22]
Forged books? In the Bible?
Why are we not surprised? After all, even the gospel authors are unknown. In fact, they’re anonymous.[23] Biblical scholars rarely, if ever, ascribe gospel authorship to Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John. As Ehrman tells us, “Most scholars today have abandoned these identifications, and recognize that the books were written by otherwise unknown but relatively well-educated Greek-speaking (and writing) Christians during the second half of the first century.”[24] Graham Stanton affirms, “The gospels, unlike most Graeco-Roman writings, are anonymous. The familiar headings which give the name of an author (‘The Gospel according to …’) were not part of the original manuscripts, for they were added only early in the second century.”[25]
So what, if anything, did Jesus’ disciples have to do with authoring the gospels? Little or nothing, so far as we know. But we have no reason to believe they authored any of the books of the Bible. To begin with, let us remember Mark was a secretary to Peter, and Luke a companion to Paul. The verses of Luke 6:14-16 and Matthew 10:2-4 catalogue the twelve disciples, and although these lists differ over two names, Mark and Luke don’t make either list. So only Matthew and John were true disciples. But all the same, modern scholars pretty much disqualify them as authors anyway.
Why?
Good question. John being the more famous of the two, why should we disqualify him from having authored the Gospel of “John”?
Umm … because he was dead?
Multiple sources acknowledge there is no evidence, other than questionable testimonies of second century authors, to suggest that the disciple John was the author of the Gospel of “John.”[26] [27] Perhaps the most convincing refutation is that the disciple John is believed to have died in or around 98 CE.[28] However, the Gospel of John was written circa 110 CE.[29] So whoever Luke (Paul’s companion), Mark (Peter’s secretary), and John (the unknown, but certainly not the long-dead one) were, we have no reason to believe any of the gospels were authored by Jesus’ disciples
How the Bible was corrupted by Dr. Bart Ehrman YouTube
كيف تم تحريف الانجيل الدكتور بارت ايرمان YouTube
New Testament of the Bible regarding Jesus by Yusha ...
هندوسية تدخل الإٍسلام بعد سؤال مترجم A hindu woman is accepting Islam
مسيحي يعتنق الإسلام في حوار مع عباس ...
Transparency and credibility of factual facts
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Transparency and credibility of factual facts
Post #121مغنو الراب الأمريكيين يدخلون الإسلام بعد طرح عدة أسئلة فقط! الشيخ عثمان فاروق
American Rappers Convert to Islam After Asking Just a Few Questions! Sheikh Osman Farooq
American Rappers Convert to Islam After Asking Just a Few Questions! Sheikh Osman Farooq
Re: Transparency and credibility of factual facts
Post #122it is impossible to omit or forget the violent events that are fully part of the gospel.
Was it not Jesus himself who announced in parables the urgency of a choice which is radical and therefore violent, as in the text of the homicidal winegrowers where they kill the son of the owner to steal the inheritance? after molesting the servants he had sent to his vineyard. reading the New Testament confronts any reader with an open violence that culminates in the arrest of Jesus, the mockery of his iniquitous trial, his torture on Golgotha and his death. We can clearly see why Jesus aroused so many hostile reactions.
"I did not come to bring peace, but the sword" (Mt 10,34). You clearly see in the Jesus of the Bible this awareness of putting in crisis by his words and his actions the usual ways of relating to the Law, to the religious institutions of the time, and ultimately to the tradition of the fathers. To remember the violence of the New Testament is to step into a dangerous tradition and bring it to life that endangers the lives of millions of Jews.
Do you believe that I have come to bring peace to this world? No. I did not come to bring peace, but the dagger. I have come to separate the son and the father, the daughter and the mother, the daughter-in-law and the mother-in-law. Who loves his father and mother more than me is not worthy of me. Whoever loves his son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And who does not follow in my footsteps, loaded with his cross, is not worthy of me either. Whoever wants to save his life will lose it. And whoever lost his life because of me will find it. (Mt 10,34-36) .. What more do you want ..
in all Muslim countries anyone who follows the events and the analysis of specialists knows that in these countries foreign forces are involved; Iraq it was an American lie it was they who started the war and it turned out that the reason put forward was a pure lie
Lebanon is under several countries influencing in particular France ... Russia for Syria ... all
and the weapons used are now known to have origins in non-Muslim countries
why don't they leave these countries alone? they say it is to defend the citizens but what is the result? it can be seen that these are lies and that the goal is economic or strategic interests .. or against Islam quite simply not to let Islamic governments settle in
foreign countries which have nothing to do with these countries except that they have interests and this under false reasons;
Europe has gone through bloody wars and has come to understand that unity is strength; Muslim countries are going through stages for a metamorphosis but foreign forces do not let this process go through they are afraid
أحمد ديدات --- الحدود وأشياء أخرى طريفة من الكتاب المقدس
إختلاف الألسُن واللُغات بين الآيات واللعنات -- من روائع الشيخ ديدات رحمه الله
أحمد ديدات - إثبات تحريف الكتاب المقدس
Was it not Jesus himself who announced in parables the urgency of a choice which is radical and therefore violent, as in the text of the homicidal winegrowers where they kill the son of the owner to steal the inheritance? after molesting the servants he had sent to his vineyard. reading the New Testament confronts any reader with an open violence that culminates in the arrest of Jesus, the mockery of his iniquitous trial, his torture on Golgotha and his death. We can clearly see why Jesus aroused so many hostile reactions.
"I did not come to bring peace, but the sword" (Mt 10,34). You clearly see in the Jesus of the Bible this awareness of putting in crisis by his words and his actions the usual ways of relating to the Law, to the religious institutions of the time, and ultimately to the tradition of the fathers. To remember the violence of the New Testament is to step into a dangerous tradition and bring it to life that endangers the lives of millions of Jews.
Do you believe that I have come to bring peace to this world? No. I did not come to bring peace, but the dagger. I have come to separate the son and the father, the daughter and the mother, the daughter-in-law and the mother-in-law. Who loves his father and mother more than me is not worthy of me. Whoever loves his son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And who does not follow in my footsteps, loaded with his cross, is not worthy of me either. Whoever wants to save his life will lose it. And whoever lost his life because of me will find it. (Mt 10,34-36) .. What more do you want ..
in all Muslim countries anyone who follows the events and the analysis of specialists knows that in these countries foreign forces are involved; Iraq it was an American lie it was they who started the war and it turned out that the reason put forward was a pure lie
Lebanon is under several countries influencing in particular France ... Russia for Syria ... all
and the weapons used are now known to have origins in non-Muslim countries
why don't they leave these countries alone? they say it is to defend the citizens but what is the result? it can be seen that these are lies and that the goal is economic or strategic interests .. or against Islam quite simply not to let Islamic governments settle in
foreign countries which have nothing to do with these countries except that they have interests and this under false reasons;
Europe has gone through bloody wars and has come to understand that unity is strength; Muslim countries are going through stages for a metamorphosis but foreign forces do not let this process go through they are afraid
أحمد ديدات --- الحدود وأشياء أخرى طريفة من الكتاب المقدس
إختلاف الألسُن واللُغات بين الآيات واللعنات -- من روائع الشيخ ديدات رحمه الله
أحمد ديدات - إثبات تحريف الكتاب المقدس
Re: Transparency and credibility of factual facts
Post #123Why did these 5 Scientists Finally Accept Islam
AFTER COMBAT - THE STORY OF A MARINE'S CONVERSION TO ISLAM
US SOLDIER BECOMES MUSLIM [OFFICIAL VIDEO]
From Gangster To Islam!
Italian Millionaire Investment Banker Accepts Islam
AFTER COMBAT - THE STORY OF A MARINE'S CONVERSION TO ISLAM
US SOLDIER BECOMES MUSLIM [OFFICIAL VIDEO]
From Gangster To Islam!
Italian Millionaire Investment Banker Accepts Islam
Re: Transparency and credibility of factual facts
Post #124The best evidence that the gospels and Acts of the Apostles are mere works of fiction is scientific or historical or literary evidence,
We can even establish by literary analysis that the original New Testament gospel was a work of fiction. Rhoads, Dewey and Michie point out, in Mark as Story that the narrator would need to have had unlimited omniscience to know everything he wrote. They say:
The composer of this story has used sophisticated storytelling techniques, developed the characters and the conflicts, and built suspense with deliberateness, telling the story to generate certain insights and responses in the audience.
Literary evidence can also be used to demonstrate that the Acts of the Apostles is a work of fiction. For example, in An Introduction to the New Testament, Raymond E. Brown points to several problematic issues:
In his undisputed letters Paul gives us no information about the first missionary journey.
doubt has been raised about the Apollos episode at Ephesus as Lucan theologising
Since there is no confirmation in the undisputed (or even the pseudonymous) Pauline letters of the appeal to Caesar and the journey to Rome, some who challenge the historicity of Acts dismiss the account of Paul's hazardous sea journey in Acts 27:1-28:14 as novelistic fiction.
We can never verify the existence and martyrdom of Stephen, or the killing of James, son of Zebedee by Herod Agrippa
Arthur J. Bellinzoni takes this comment further, in The New Testament: An Introduction to Biblical Scholarship:
Whether this account [Acts 6] of the Hellenists and of Stephen's martyrdom reflects actual events in the history of the early church or is simply Lukan "theologized" history with little or no factual content is debated by equally competent scholars. The stories in Acts are permeated by literary, , leaving us with little confidence about details of the early history of the Jesus movement.
كاهن مستقبلي يحاول تنصير مسلم | محمد علي
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJRoEaCQVPE
ضربهم في موطنهم!��الشيخ عثمان في أكثر المناطق الأمريكية نصرانية دون خوف وآخر يخاف من زوجته��
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9r3pH24P2E
هندوسيون يسألون عثمان بن فاروق عن الشيعة وطالبان
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbDMKshDkz8
����مصري مسيحي يحاول إعاقة الدعوة
إلا أنه فشل أمام الشيخ عثمان! النقاش الذي أنهى الجدل
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SjgPgPzyJ8
We can even establish by literary analysis that the original New Testament gospel was a work of fiction. Rhoads, Dewey and Michie point out, in Mark as Story that the narrator would need to have had unlimited omniscience to know everything he wrote. They say:
The composer of this story has used sophisticated storytelling techniques, developed the characters and the conflicts, and built suspense with deliberateness, telling the story to generate certain insights and responses in the audience.
Literary evidence can also be used to demonstrate that the Acts of the Apostles is a work of fiction. For example, in An Introduction to the New Testament, Raymond E. Brown points to several problematic issues:
In his undisputed letters Paul gives us no information about the first missionary journey.
doubt has been raised about the Apollos episode at Ephesus as Lucan theologising
Since there is no confirmation in the undisputed (or even the pseudonymous) Pauline letters of the appeal to Caesar and the journey to Rome, some who challenge the historicity of Acts dismiss the account of Paul's hazardous sea journey in Acts 27:1-28:14 as novelistic fiction.
We can never verify the existence and martyrdom of Stephen, or the killing of James, son of Zebedee by Herod Agrippa
Arthur J. Bellinzoni takes this comment further, in The New Testament: An Introduction to Biblical Scholarship:
Whether this account [Acts 6] of the Hellenists and of Stephen's martyrdom reflects actual events in the history of the early church or is simply Lukan "theologized" history with little or no factual content is debated by equally competent scholars. The stories in Acts are permeated by literary, , leaving us with little confidence about details of the early history of the Jesus movement.
كاهن مستقبلي يحاول تنصير مسلم | محمد علي
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJRoEaCQVPE
ضربهم في موطنهم!��الشيخ عثمان في أكثر المناطق الأمريكية نصرانية دون خوف وآخر يخاف من زوجته��
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9r3pH24P2E
هندوسيون يسألون عثمان بن فاروق عن الشيعة وطالبان
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbDMKshDkz8
����مصري مسيحي يحاول إعاقة الدعوة
إلا أنه فشل أمام الشيخ عثمان! النقاش الذي أنهى الجدلhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SjgPgPzyJ8
Re: Transparency and credibility of factual facts
Post #126When Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) conquered Macca, All were forgiven and there were people who planed for his killing and would not miss an opportunity to harm him. He forgiven all and told them you are safe. Even Abu Sufyan who was a commander of Macca Army, was also forgiven.
He was always merciful even when people say bad things about him or threw garbage on him he told everyone whats wrong and right but with love yeah even when someine said someting against friends he corrects them he never said anything to hurt anyone ever
Prophet Muhammad’s anti-racist views are seen in his friendship with Bilal ibn Rabah, a black slave who rose to a leading position within the Muslim community of 7th century Arabia. One story relates how Muhammad defended Bilal after Abu Dharr Al-Ghifari, one of the Prophet’s companions, called Bilal “the son of a black woman.” Annoyed with this emphasis of identifying people by skin color, Muhammad criticized Abu Dharr by stating “you are the man who still has the traits of ignorance in him.” The Prophet’s reference to Abu Dharr’s ignorance refers to the “pre-Islamic” state of jahiliyyah, an Arabic term meaning “the state of ignorance of Divine guidance.”
The miracles of the Holy Quran amazed the world and the mistakes of the Christians’ book
معجزات القرءان الكريم أذهلت العالم وأخطاء كتاب النصارى
بابا الفاتيكان يطرد قس باحث عن الحقيقة من الكانيسة بسبب اسئلته المحرجه
Pope expels truth-seeking priest from church over embarrassing questions
He was always merciful even when people say bad things about him or threw garbage on him he told everyone whats wrong and right but with love yeah even when someine said someting against friends he corrects them he never said anything to hurt anyone ever
Prophet Muhammad’s anti-racist views are seen in his friendship with Bilal ibn Rabah, a black slave who rose to a leading position within the Muslim community of 7th century Arabia. One story relates how Muhammad defended Bilal after Abu Dharr Al-Ghifari, one of the Prophet’s companions, called Bilal “the son of a black woman.” Annoyed with this emphasis of identifying people by skin color, Muhammad criticized Abu Dharr by stating “you are the man who still has the traits of ignorance in him.” The Prophet’s reference to Abu Dharr’s ignorance refers to the “pre-Islamic” state of jahiliyyah, an Arabic term meaning “the state of ignorance of Divine guidance.”
The miracles of the Holy Quran amazed the world and the mistakes of the Christians’ book
معجزات القرءان الكريم أذهلت العالم وأخطاء كتاب النصارى
بابا الفاتيكان يطرد قس باحث عن الحقيقة من الكانيسة بسبب اسئلته المحرجه
Pope expels truth-seeking priest from church over embarrassing questions
Re: Transparency and credibility of factual facts
Post #128The Bible lies a lot about Jesus because the four scribes and Paul falsified many facts
Allah did not help followers of previous messengers establish religion in vast part of the world. Allah mentions in Quran that He sent messengers but religious people distorted religion and created sects. (Quran 2:213) Jews made the religion a family business and did not spread it among others. After Jesus, peace be upon him, it took followers of Jesus several decades to compile Bible. The last manuscript of Bible is 300 years after Prophet Jesus, peace be upon him.
Christianity got power when Roman empire embraced it, several hundred years after Jesus. However, Bible was not translated into a popular language until 1536. Until then the Church controlled learning and study of the Bible. The phase of 1500 years when Europe did not progress scientifically and when Church partnered with political class to establish influence is known as dark ages in the history of Europe.
But the Qur’an has been proven by scholars to be true scientifically, morally and historicallyThe Qur’an is the word of God
God promised in the Quran to protect and preserve the Quran.
[Quran 15:9] Absolutely, we have revealed the reminder, and, absolutely, we will preserve it.
Because you have an original source for the Qur’an, which is the Arabic language in which the Qur’an was revealed, even if there is an error in one of the translations to interpret the meanings of the Qur’an.
You have an original source to correct the translation
Unlike Christians, they do not understand their Bible and interpret it according to their whims
I always say you should learn about Islam from specialized Islamic centers
Christ spoke the Aramaic language
However, you will not find the original source of the Bible as a reference for Christians in the Aramaic language, but only translations in different languages such as Greek and other languages. You do not have a reliable and original source to correct the mistakes of the writers and the incorrect translation.
The fact is there are 40,000 Christian sects. We can fill a football stadium with Christians, every one of them can have different beliefs. Every one of them calling themselves Christian. Every one of them having Different beliefs then you.
Can you not wrap your head around how insane this is?
How anyone can argue the Bible is not changed today is amazing honestly. Seriously, they literally continue to change it even today!
Allah undertook to preserve the Quran because people of previous scriptures failed to uphold God's covenant of revealing God's word to humankind. People of previous scriptures also blended human contributions to the same volume of the Divine text.
If the Qur’an was as Islam haters and church mercenaries say, why would thousands embrace Islam?
The Gospels, the Injil, and the Qur'an | Paul Williams
Orthodox Corruption of Scripture-Book Review by Paul Williams
Secrets of The Scrolls | Dead Sea Scrolls | Paul Williams
Scientists Finally Accepting That Quran is From Allah
Allah did not help followers of previous messengers establish religion in vast part of the world. Allah mentions in Quran that He sent messengers but religious people distorted religion and created sects. (Quran 2:213) Jews made the religion a family business and did not spread it among others. After Jesus, peace be upon him, it took followers of Jesus several decades to compile Bible. The last manuscript of Bible is 300 years after Prophet Jesus, peace be upon him.
Christianity got power when Roman empire embraced it, several hundred years after Jesus. However, Bible was not translated into a popular language until 1536. Until then the Church controlled learning and study of the Bible. The phase of 1500 years when Europe did not progress scientifically and when Church partnered with political class to establish influence is known as dark ages in the history of Europe.
But the Qur’an has been proven by scholars to be true scientifically, morally and historicallyThe Qur’an is the word of God
God promised in the Quran to protect and preserve the Quran.
[Quran 15:9] Absolutely, we have revealed the reminder, and, absolutely, we will preserve it.
Because you have an original source for the Qur’an, which is the Arabic language in which the Qur’an was revealed, even if there is an error in one of the translations to interpret the meanings of the Qur’an.
You have an original source to correct the translation
Unlike Christians, they do not understand their Bible and interpret it according to their whims
I always say you should learn about Islam from specialized Islamic centers
Christ spoke the Aramaic language
However, you will not find the original source of the Bible as a reference for Christians in the Aramaic language, but only translations in different languages such as Greek and other languages. You do not have a reliable and original source to correct the mistakes of the writers and the incorrect translation.
The fact is there are 40,000 Christian sects. We can fill a football stadium with Christians, every one of them can have different beliefs. Every one of them calling themselves Christian. Every one of them having Different beliefs then you.
Can you not wrap your head around how insane this is?
How anyone can argue the Bible is not changed today is amazing honestly. Seriously, they literally continue to change it even today!
Allah undertook to preserve the Quran because people of previous scriptures failed to uphold God's covenant of revealing God's word to humankind. People of previous scriptures also blended human contributions to the same volume of the Divine text.
If the Qur’an was as Islam haters and church mercenaries say, why would thousands embrace Islam?
The Gospels, the Injil, and the Qur'an | Paul Williams
Orthodox Corruption of Scripture-Book Review by Paul Williams
Secrets of The Scrolls | Dead Sea Scrolls | Paul Williams
Scientists Finally Accepting That Quran is From Allah
Re: Transparency and credibility of factual facts
Post #129God is perfect, has no flaws, knows everything
God was not born from a woman's vagina
God does not leave his creation to kill him
God does not eat, sleep, or defecate
God has no human imperfections
God does nothing that can harm his greatness
God has absolute power and follows no one
But Christ follows the will of God (the Father)
Christ did not know the time of the hour
People tried to kill him
He eats, sleeps and poops
Christ was born of a woman
God (the Father) is God alone and Christ is the prophet of God only and is not equal to God (the Father)
Why doesn't God come down to earth instead of the messengers?
The answer for us Muslims is in ‘Aaya 21:23, He is never to be questioned about any act of His while they( people) are to be questioned for their acts.
Allah has given us the messages through his own words in the Quran , and then appointed prophets and Messengers from among us to explain the verses to us. So it is not true that Allah has not conveyed the message Himself.
This whole issue goes back to whether we accept God as the Doer of everything. If we accept this principle that God is doing everything, it follows easily that He explains the Quran through His messenger. It is not the messenger who is doing the explaining, it is God. The messenger is just the means of communication – he is just delivering the message from God to us.
The danger is in forgetting that the guidance is from God and attributing it to the messenger. The messenger does not really guide or explain or purify. Those things happen through him in accordance with God’s will. God is the One who guides and explains and purifies.
“If you want to talk to Allah offer Salah. If you want Allah to talk to you read Quraan.”
The question was can Allah talk communicate with human beings.
So the answer is Yes, he can communicate and he does communicate by Salah and Quran.
P1 Perfection of God in Islam Vs the Bible! Shamsi and Visitor Speakers Corner
P2 Perfection Of God In Islam vs The Bible! Shamsi and Visitor Speakers Corner
Why Don't Allah come down on earth (Zakir Naik)
بروفيسور صيني يتقبل الهزيمة من الشيخ عثمان بعد أن كانت كل أبحاثه في الإنجيل
A Chinese professor accepts defeat from Sheikh Othman after all his research was in the Bible
God was not born from a woman's vagina
God does not leave his creation to kill him
God does not eat, sleep, or defecate
God has no human imperfections
God does nothing that can harm his greatness
God has absolute power and follows no one
But Christ follows the will of God (the Father)
Christ did not know the time of the hour
People tried to kill him
He eats, sleeps and poops
Christ was born of a woman
God (the Father) is God alone and Christ is the prophet of God only and is not equal to God (the Father)
Why doesn't God come down to earth instead of the messengers?
The answer for us Muslims is in ‘Aaya 21:23, He is never to be questioned about any act of His while they( people) are to be questioned for their acts.
Allah has given us the messages through his own words in the Quran , and then appointed prophets and Messengers from among us to explain the verses to us. So it is not true that Allah has not conveyed the message Himself.
This whole issue goes back to whether we accept God as the Doer of everything. If we accept this principle that God is doing everything, it follows easily that He explains the Quran through His messenger. It is not the messenger who is doing the explaining, it is God. The messenger is just the means of communication – he is just delivering the message from God to us.
The danger is in forgetting that the guidance is from God and attributing it to the messenger. The messenger does not really guide or explain or purify. Those things happen through him in accordance with God’s will. God is the One who guides and explains and purifies.
“If you want to talk to Allah offer Salah. If you want Allah to talk to you read Quraan.”
The question was can Allah talk communicate with human beings.
So the answer is Yes, he can communicate and he does communicate by Salah and Quran.
P1 Perfection of God in Islam Vs the Bible! Shamsi and Visitor Speakers Corner
P2 Perfection Of God In Islam vs The Bible! Shamsi and Visitor Speakers Corner
Why Don't Allah come down on earth (Zakir Naik)
بروفيسور صيني يتقبل الهزيمة من الشيخ عثمان بعد أن كانت كل أبحاثه في الإنجيل
A Chinese professor accepts defeat from Sheikh Othman after all his research was in the Bible
