Mind you, please, the emotional awareness/hyper-sensitivity of feelings (by focusing on the feelings) requirement it takes to achieve good results from the Ganzfeld experiments (also by email).
I can speculate that the nature of particles are not so confined as we may think and thus that these particles "by a kind of erratic behaviour" can effectuate "telepathy" to the extent that "telepathy" exists.
This means that, instead of walking the confined lines of self-motivated physicists, one can consider whatever explanation one wants oneself and I choose "the erratic, irregular behaviour" of certain particles of the kind of photon nature or whatever "monades" that are in the world of nature! I think one should seek wild explanations in the cases where no explanation exists and this is one such case! The case of telepathy requires a correspondingly wild explanation in physics and I provide this writing on it!
Telepathy can be very inexact and it can be troubling to discern it all. With telepathy, you may want to investigate "quantum entanglement", "contextualism" and "chaos theory". All of this is just assertions based on personal experience, but I've written it so now you can find out yourselves.
Your view?
Check it out!
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
PS: I've been investigating the issue of telepathy since 2003. In addition, I've been looking into the diagnoses of psychiatry almost from the same point, given the angle from Philosophy of Science and the scientific problems coming with it, being placed aside from the "hard sciences" from that time, and along with the standing of psychology.
----
(Edit:) Don't blame me for weird character marks. "Internet-ghosts"? The "... of "Telepathy&..."