The idealistic distortion of manifest destiny from QT.
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2015 9:15 pm
There is a distortion of elements from quantum mechanics that people are now applying to manifest a reality/destiny.
There is no part, that thought creates a reality in the quantum realm, it is by observation only do reactions manifest / change. This is a misconception that is continually being perpetuated in new age type spiritualism of a connected consciousness to manifest reality. The main proponent of this is Heart Math a private research center to sell products and inventions so one can tune in to this consciousness and manifest their ideal reality. This is not what occurs in QM, what actually is happening is that where we think something should be it will not, also what form or interaction that which is occurring is not what we thought it would be. This is actually the opposite of a connected consciousness. We by our standard Laws of Thought do not control what is going to or how things will occur, no amount of thought changes reality except if thought is shared and collectively accepted, than it takes action for it to manifest.
Why can such schools of thought work to aid one to change their life, well attitude matters when one faces change. When one believes it will occur we will often begin to take actions unconsciously to achieve the goal, such idealistic views as "The Secret" is not a 'secret' it is thought in motion, i.e. action and usually proactive to bring about desired goal. This in medical field is known as placebo effect, were just thinking you will get better will make you better. This has a logical biological reason, lack of stress, we nor any organisms natural healing abilities are lessened when under stress. So less stress means better healing, there is no reason to differentiate between thought and biological functions, once again chicken or the egg.
Do you think there is merit to manifest destiny beyond one's own attitudes, or is there a real actual physical process that thought manifest reality without action?
I am doing a thesis and just want some pro cons and perhaps different directions of thought. I do not want to debate but may ask questions of if I find intriguing. I'm stuck on the pro side of why and am trying to steer away from an reference only to theism but am finding it difficult to see a difference.
There is no part, that thought creates a reality in the quantum realm, it is by observation only do reactions manifest / change. This is a misconception that is continually being perpetuated in new age type spiritualism of a connected consciousness to manifest reality. The main proponent of this is Heart Math a private research center to sell products and inventions so one can tune in to this consciousness and manifest their ideal reality. This is not what occurs in QM, what actually is happening is that where we think something should be it will not, also what form or interaction that which is occurring is not what we thought it would be. This is actually the opposite of a connected consciousness. We by our standard Laws of Thought do not control what is going to or how things will occur, no amount of thought changes reality except if thought is shared and collectively accepted, than it takes action for it to manifest.
Why can such schools of thought work to aid one to change their life, well attitude matters when one faces change. When one believes it will occur we will often begin to take actions unconsciously to achieve the goal, such idealistic views as "The Secret" is not a 'secret' it is thought in motion, i.e. action and usually proactive to bring about desired goal. This in medical field is known as placebo effect, were just thinking you will get better will make you better. This has a logical biological reason, lack of stress, we nor any organisms natural healing abilities are lessened when under stress. So less stress means better healing, there is no reason to differentiate between thought and biological functions, once again chicken or the egg.
Do you think there is merit to manifest destiny beyond one's own attitudes, or is there a real actual physical process that thought manifest reality without action?
I am doing a thesis and just want some pro cons and perhaps different directions of thought. I do not want to debate but may ask questions of if I find intriguing. I'm stuck on the pro side of why and am trying to steer away from an reference only to theism but am finding it difficult to see a difference.