It amazes me that the "freewill," argument has persisted so long, and not been put in the ground earlier, but such is often the case with the truth.
Usually the freewill argument starts off in the Garden of Eden, inappropriately and deceptively. This approach reverses the argument so that it is debatable, but in context, there is no debate.
"Do what God wills, or go to Hell."
There is no room for freewill there.
God does not allow freewill.
QED.
Freewill, in context, RIP
Moderator: Moderators
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 21109
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 792 times
- Been thanked: 1122 times
- Contact:
Re: Freewill, in context, RIP
Post #51How in your opinion can John 3:27 be considered a reference to predestination and the absence of free will?
JW
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
- Willum
- Savant
- Posts: 9017
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 2:14 pm
- Location: Yahweh's Burial Place
- Has thanked: 35 times
- Been thanked: 82 times
Re: Freewill, in context, RIP
Post #52[Replying to JehovahsWitness in post #50]
So, once again, you are asking me, as an authority on your religious works, since you do not know.
Since you do not know about your own religion, I find your opinion about it dismissible.
So, once again, you are asking me, as an authority on your religious works, since you do not know.
Since you do not know about your own religion, I find your opinion about it dismissible.
Re: Freewill, in context, RIP
Post #53JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Tue Jul 14, 2020 4:00 pm How in your opinion can John 3:27 be considered a reference to predestination and the absence of free will?
JW
If you pray for something and don't get it from above, it proves you do not have free will to make or create life on your terms. For example, there have been people stuck in death row who were innocent and prayed for release. But, BOOM, they got croaked. Obviously, such an unhappy fate is proof of predestination.
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6002
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6623 times
- Been thanked: 3219 times
Re: Freewill, in context, RIP
Post #54Humans are animals. Please present evidence that animals died prior to the fall and that humans were made in the image of God. Ancient folklore is not evidence by the way.
God punished Adam and Eve for their disobedience. The punishment did not fit the crime. That puts his actions in the realm of vindictiveness. God clearly has an infinite ego along with his other allegedly infinite attributes.
George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
-
- Under Probation
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2020 12:07 pm
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 31 times
Re: Freewill, in context, RIP
Post #55Okay, humans are animals. It makes absolutely no difference what you call them. Pain, suffering, death etc. occurred in other animals prior to "the fall." If ancient folklore is not evidence that humans were made in the image of God on what basis do you determine that God's punishment of Adam and Eve didn't fit the crime, his actions were vindictive and he has an infinite ego?brunumb wrote: ↑Tue Jul 14, 2020 10:32 pmHumans are animals. Please present evidence that animals died prior to the fall and that humans were made in the image of God. Ancient folklore is not evidence by the way.
God punished Adam and Eve for their disobedience. The punishment did not fit the crime. That puts his actions in the realm of vindictiveness. God clearly has an infinite ego along with his other allegedly infinite attributes.
I already demonstrated that the Bible is in agreement of God being vindictive by definition and I don't think that I would argue that the creator of the universe and everything has "an infinite ego."
What's your point?
I no longer post here
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 21109
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 792 times
- Been thanked: 1122 times
- Contact:
Re: Freewill, in context, RIP
Post #56So for you "free will" can be defined as the ability to "make or create life on your terms"?
JW
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
- Willum
- Savant
- Posts: 9017
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 2:14 pm
- Location: Yahweh's Burial Place
- Has thanked: 35 times
- Been thanked: 82 times
Re: Freewill, in context, RIP
Post #57[Replying to JehovahsWitness in post #56]
Again, it isn't about him, or me, or any personal definition of the terms of your myth.
That you persist in doing this, simply demonstrates your are unwilling to face the inconsistencies of your worship, and must criticize the ad hoc words used by others.
But let's examine the sacrifice you made to do this:
You are saying that whatever verbiage koko comes up with, has as much merit as your own beliefs, as it is more worth discussing than what you consider your religious truths.
That is an issue for you.
Again, it isn't about him, or me, or any personal definition of the terms of your myth.
That you persist in doing this, simply demonstrates your are unwilling to face the inconsistencies of your worship, and must criticize the ad hoc words used by others.
But let's examine the sacrifice you made to do this:
You are saying that whatever verbiage koko comes up with, has as much merit as your own beliefs, as it is more worth discussing than what you consider your religious truths.
That is an issue for you.
Re: Freewill, in context, RIP
Post #58JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 2:01 amSo for you "free will" can be defined as the ability to "make or create life on your terms"?
JW
I would expand that to include the ability to be free of someone else's or of Nature's or of Fate's attempts as well.
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 21109
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 792 times
- Been thanked: 1122 times
- Contact:
Re: Freewill, in context, RIP
Post #59koko wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:02 amI would expand that to include the ability to be free of someone else's or of Nature's or of Fate's attempts as well.JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 2:01 amSo for you "free will" can be defined as the ability to "make or create life on your terms"?
JW
Fair enough duly noted. The OP did state one can take "free will" to mean whatever one likes, that's what you like.
Thanks for sharing,
JW
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
Re: Freewill, in context, RIP
Post #60Freewill is the battle cry for believers; it's more "stuff" they like to spout to support their lofty, illogical, misdirected belief system: 'You have free will - you're free to bow down and worship this killing deity or go to hell!'Willum wrote: ↑Sun Jul 12, 2020 12:17 pm It amazes me that the "freewill," argument has persisted so long, and not been put in the ground earlier, but such is often the case with the truth.
Usually the freewill argument starts off in the Garden of Eden, inappropriately and deceptively. This approach reverses the argument so that it is debatable, but in context, there is no debate.
"Do what God wills, or go to Hell."
There is no room for freewill there.
God does not allow freewill.
QED.
Technically they're not wrong, just misguided by a lie they have accept to fit their needs.
But the jokes on them: if we go to hell we will be seeing almost all of them there.