Unless you live under a rock, then you're all aware that illness is a big factor in our lives. Even if you're very lucky and live free of illness, you probably know somebody who struggles with sickness. How can illness be explained within the context of Christianity? Why would a God allow sickness?
As far as I know, neither Jesus nor any of his apostles were ever said to be sick. None of them are described as blind, deaf, or lame. They did believe that various infirmities are caused by demons, and the cure was to cast the demons out. According to the gospel, these healing activities attracted great multitudes of people seeking delivery from their afflictions. So obviously illness was a major factor in the lives of those who were contemporaneous with Jesus.
One thing I've noticed about sickness is that it does not discriminate based on faith. It doesn't care what your beliefs are. That's why, for example, people gathering to worship is strongly discouraged due to the risk of Covid 19.
Apologetics & Illness
Moderator: Moderators
- Paul of Tarsus
- Banned
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 8:42 pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 150 times
- Paul of Tarsus
- Banned
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 8:42 pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 150 times
Re: Apologetics & Illness
Post #171My late Dad used to say that this world is God's "proving grounds." What God needed to prove with us my Dad never specified. In my Dad's last years he was confined to a nursing home, and he was unhappy there complaining a lot about it. He wasn't so philosophical when he was going through trials rather than somebody else. So the moral of the story is that it's easy to come up with shallow reasons for suffering when others suffer, but when we are suffering, it is more difficult to explain why God allows suffering.
- Paul of Tarsus
- Banned
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 8:42 pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 150 times
Re: Apologetics & Illness
Post #173I would agree if God is deliberately causing the suffering while he could choose to do differently. Another possibility is that God would choose to end the suffering but cannot.
I think a very important and relevant fact to keep in mind is that life is mostly good most of the time. If we want to blame God for the bad, then it's only fair to credit him for the good.
Re: Apologetics & Illness
Post #174I don't see anything good about the Biblical god character.Paul of Tarsus wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 9:13 amI would agree if God is deliberately causing the suffering while he could choose to do differently. Another possibility is that God would choose to end the suffering but cannot.
I think a very important and relevant fact to keep in mind is that life is mostly good most of the time. If we want to blame God for the bad, then it's only fair to credit him for the good.
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8494
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2147 times
- Been thanked: 2295 times
Re: Apologetics & Illness
Post #175Sure, but it makes one wonder why he'd deserve the title "God" then.Paul of Tarsus wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 9:13 amI would agree if God is deliberately causing the suffering while he could choose to do differently. Another possibility is that God would choose to end the suffering but cannot.
Why? If as you've surmised above he has no ability to control the bad, why should we think he has anything to do with the good? You've painted a picture of a god whose actions, or rather lack thereof, mirror a god that doesn't exist.
I think a very important and relevant fact to keep in mind is that life is mostly good most of the time. If we want to blame God for the bad, then it's only fair to credit him for the good.
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 21111
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 792 times
- Been thanked: 1122 times
- Contact:
Re: Apologetics & Illness
Post #176The bible says : "When under trial, let no one say: “I am being tried by God.” For with evil things God cannot be tried, nor does he himself try anyone." - James 1:13.
JEHOVAH'S WITNESS
To learn more please go to other posts related to...
SICKNESS , HUMAN SUFFERING and .... THE ISSUE OF UNIVERSAL SOVEREIGNTY
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2572 times
Re: Apologetics & Illness
Post #177From the OP:
The Bible also says you can change the colors or patterns of critters by poking sticks in the ground, among other sense-assaulting claims.
Doesn't make it true.
Unless this section of the site now assumes the Bible to be accurate, I challenge anyone to show a god / God allows anything.OP wrote: ...
How can illness be explained within the context of Christianity? Why would a God allow sickness?
I consider such to be a plot device. Not many folks fancyem a sickly hero.OP wrote: ...
As far as I know, neither Jesus nor any of his apostles were ever said to be sick.
The Bible also says you can change the colors or patterns of critters by poking sticks in the ground, among other sense-assaulting claims.
Heck, there's some that believe it now.OP wrote: ...
They did believe that various infirmities are caused by demons, and the cure was to cast the demons out.
...
Doesn't make it true.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
- Paul of Tarsus
- Banned
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2020 8:42 pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 150 times
Re: Apologetics & Illness
Post #178I said if we blame God for the bad, then we should credit God for the good. That's a conditional statement. Blaming God for the bad assumes he can do something about the bad. On the condition that we assume he can do something about the bad, we logically should assume he can grant the good. There's good in the world. Based on our assumptions, God gets the credit for the good along with blame for the bad.Tcg wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 1:39 pmWhy? If as you've surmised above he has no ability to control the bad, why should we think he has anything to do with the good?Paul of Tarsus wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 9:13 am I think a very important and relevant fact to keep in mind is that life is mostly good most of the time. If we want to blame God for the bad, then it's only fair to credit him for the good.
I'm not exactly sure how you've arrived at that conclusion, but I assume for now that you are saying that if there was no God, then we would have the same amount of good and bad in the world as we do now. Yes, that mixture of good and bad may be consistent with no God existing, but it's also consistent with a God who exists but who cannot do any better than what we experience. So saying that the good and bad in the world makes the world look like a world where there's no God doesn't prove much. As Woody Allen quipped:You've painted a picture of a god whose actions, or rather lack thereof, mirror a god that doesn't exist.
I wouldn't really say that God is evil. Let's just say he's an underachiever.