Yeti. Yowie. Grassman. Skunk Ape. There are said to be types of sasquatches - bigfoot as popularized by media over the last 40-ish years.
Dogman
Lizard man
Nessie (Loch Ness monster), Champ and Ogopogo.
Mothman
Even flying humanoids
All of these cryptids have claimed experiencers as well as evidence (photos, videos, tracks, verification of indigenous people from scientific documentation, etc) - some even have potential fossil records to prove they're possible.
While there have been proven fakes (see famous Nessie photo), not all evidence is proven fake.
All of these have more 'evidence' for them than God. There's no footprints of God. No photos or videos or fossil record evidence. The best we have is personal experiences (which, while many hold true fundamentally, there are variances in the how, where and what of the experience), a few claims here-n-there showing 'proof' of a work of God (how many times has Noah's Ark been found?) and a book written by people said to have been inspired by God.
As silly of a comparison as it sounds, there does seem to be more non-anecdotal evidence of Nessie, Bigfoot, Dogman, etc. than God with there being MUCH more believers in God than any of the cryptids.
So does this mean the ultimate outcome (eternal heaven) mean more to people than actual knowledge of something in the here and now?
Bigfoot, Dogman, Lizard Man, Moth Man, God. Which is more likely?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:32 am
- Has thanked: 1510 times
- Been thanked: 824 times
Bigfoot, Dogman, Lizard Man, Moth Man, God. Which is more likely?
Post #1Have a great, potentially godless, day!
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:32 am
- Has thanked: 1510 times
- Been thanked: 824 times
Re: Bigfoot, Dogman, Lizard Man, Moth Man, God. Which is more likely?
Post #41So 'correctly' is biased towards your god, in your eyes, which supports my claim that you refuted.1213 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 12:59 pmI think person with correct understanding wouldn’t say “God doesn’t exist”, nor would keep something wrong as his God, like for example a golden calf.nobspeople wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 9:48 am ...So an atheist can be righteous? Or someone who worships another god? After all, anyone can be wise of the just and understand things correctly.
But thanks for the feedback.
Have a great, potentially godless, day!
- 1213
- Savant
- Posts: 11446
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 326 times
- Been thanked: 370 times
Re: Bigfoot, Dogman, Lizard Man, Moth Man, God. Which is more likely?
Post #42I think reason is towards Bible God. It simply would not be reasonable to keep something else as God and it would not be reasonable to say that God doesn’t exist.
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:32 am
- Has thanked: 1510 times
- Been thanked: 824 times
Re: Bigfoot, Dogman, Lizard Man, Moth Man, God. Which is more likely?
Post #43In regards to the bolded section, many would disagree. But it depends on one's experiences and ability to engage in level and critical thinking and reasoning.
Have a great, potentially godless, day!
-
- Savant
- Posts: 8141
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:05 am
- Has thanked: 954 times
- Been thanked: 3545 times
Re: Bigfoot, Dogman, Lizard Man, Moth Man, God. Which is more likely?
Post #44I like the comparison of supernatural with supernatural. We all know what we mean by 'supernatural' - something that is outside the understanding of science. Not the knowledge of science. We know about the odd stuff that quantum does - it is a real thing, but can't be explained. Alternatively, there are unknowns that are understood, like alien races on other planets. We just don't know they are real.
There is stuff like gods, ghosts, Bigfoot, flying saucers, astrology, Dowsing and Atlantis. It all falls under the 'supernatural' heading and, if one might protest that 'pseudo - science' is a better term, what is more pseudo - science that the claims of Creationism?
It's true that some science - fringe stuff has been validated, like ball -lightning and the giant squid. Bear in mind that the Higgs -Boson was not validated until the Hadron collider provided evidence. It was (like Abiogenesis) a very likely hypothesis.
On the other hand, some of the supernatural claims can take on the methods of religion, and religion, it has to be said, can take on the methods of pseudo - science. The apologetics for flying saucers and the like are absolutely on a par with religious apologetics. For example 'why don't they land on the White house lawn?' is explained by: 'they can't do that - it would freak society out'. This is not ulike':'Why doesn't God make himself known?' Well freaking us out won't do, but 'it interferes with Free will' will do instead.
So a god really is no more likely than flying - saucer pilots, leprechauns or Santa Claus, which are often used as analogies. That it was taken seriously for thousands of years, and still is, tells us about the human varieties of delusion, but it doesn't tell us anything about gods.
The example of a door handle inexplicably turning is a good one. It sets out nicely what would look like the supernatural or a miracle. But you'd have to validate it or it's just anecdotal. Just the claim that someone saw it would prove nothing. Neither would a video of it. Someone on the other side could be doing it. You have to do repeated investigation and validation or the Claim of the supernatual/miracle is worthless.
Why would they fake it? Just like the UFO apologetoc: "Why would they lie?" Well, because cult apologetics works that way. Evidence is there to persuade people to believe, and since the belief is faith -based, it is legitimate to fake evidence. I have seen plenty of examples of that, both in UFO and religious apologetics.
There is stuff like gods, ghosts, Bigfoot, flying saucers, astrology, Dowsing and Atlantis. It all falls under the 'supernatural' heading and, if one might protest that 'pseudo - science' is a better term, what is more pseudo - science that the claims of Creationism?
It's true that some science - fringe stuff has been validated, like ball -lightning and the giant squid. Bear in mind that the Higgs -Boson was not validated until the Hadron collider provided evidence. It was (like Abiogenesis) a very likely hypothesis.
On the other hand, some of the supernatural claims can take on the methods of religion, and religion, it has to be said, can take on the methods of pseudo - science. The apologetics for flying saucers and the like are absolutely on a par with religious apologetics. For example 'why don't they land on the White house lawn?' is explained by: 'they can't do that - it would freak society out'. This is not ulike':'Why doesn't God make himself known?' Well freaking us out won't do, but 'it interferes with Free will' will do instead.
So a god really is no more likely than flying - saucer pilots, leprechauns or Santa Claus, which are often used as analogies. That it was taken seriously for thousands of years, and still is, tells us about the human varieties of delusion, but it doesn't tell us anything about gods.
The example of a door handle inexplicably turning is a good one. It sets out nicely what would look like the supernatural or a miracle. But you'd have to validate it or it's just anecdotal. Just the claim that someone saw it would prove nothing. Neither would a video of it. Someone on the other side could be doing it. You have to do repeated investigation and validation or the Claim of the supernatual/miracle is worthless.
Why would they fake it? Just like the UFO apologetoc: "Why would they lie?" Well, because cult apologetics works that way. Evidence is there to persuade people to believe, and since the belief is faith -based, it is legitimate to fake evidence. I have seen plenty of examples of that, both in UFO and religious apologetics.
- The Nice Centurion
- Sage
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:47 pm
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
Re: Bigfoot, Dogman, Lizard Man, Moth Man, God. Which is more likely?
Post #45We have the next best thing: The footprint of the first human on earth: AdamDifflugia wrote: ↑Wed Feb 17, 2021 2:25 pmAhem.nobspeople wrote: ↑Wed Feb 17, 2021 1:07 pmThere's no footprints of God. No photos or videos or fossil record evidence.
https://theislamicinformation.com/stori ... sri-lanka/
(Or maybe its from Buddha or Shiva)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam%27s_Peak
No Matter! Joseph Smith unearthed the Skeleton of Lamanite Chieftain Zelph!
https://www.ldsliving.com/when-joseph-s ... ph/s/86058
So there ARE fossil records (or at least this one)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zelph#: ... 0Mound%208.
We may have no photo of "god", though we may have a real photo of Joseph Smith himself - And that is almost the same as a photo of god, cause Joseph Smith was the greatest Prophet of all time. (He himself wrote that fact into the bible, so it should be true!)
https://www.sltrib.com/religion/2022/07 ... n-founder/
Said that, I harbor the suspicion that Mothman was a man-made flying construct. Some sort of remote controlled model airplane with two searchlights (looking like glowing eyes).
“If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. But if you drown a man in a fish pond, he will never have to go hungry again”
"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon"
"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates"
"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon"
"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates"
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2023 3:46 pm
Re: Bigfoot, Dogman, Lizard Man, Moth Man, God. Which is more likely?
Post #46Technology has changed the way we live, work, and communicate with each other. One of the significant technological advancements that have emerged in recent years is Keyword four, which refers to the process of using algorithms and machine learning techniques to analyze large amounts of data and derive insights from it. Lead Sherpa Alternative has transformed the way businesses operate, and it has enabled them to make data-driven decisions that are more accurate and informed. With the help of Keyword four, companies can now analyze customer behavior, identify trends, and make predictions about future outcomes. Moreover, Keyword four has also revolutionized the field of healthcare, where it is being used to diagnose diseases, develop personalized treatment plans, and identify potential health risks. As technology continues to advance, we can expect Keyword four to become even more sophisticated, leading to even more significant benefits and advancements in various fields.
- boatsnguitars
- Banned
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2023 10:09 am
- Has thanked: 477 times
- Been thanked: 580 times
Re: Bigfoot, Dogman, Lizard Man, Moth Man, God. Which is more likely?
Post #47Yep, it is mutilation - courtesy of the Jesus Cult. Yet, they claim they're the Good Guys....nobspeople wrote: ↑Wed Feb 17, 2021 2:32 pmI watched a Netflix shows a while back about the history of circumcision. It was fascinating both for its history and how many people feel like they were mutulated.Difflugia wrote: ↑Wed Feb 17, 2021 2:25 pmAhem.nobspeople wrote: ↑Wed Feb 17, 2021 1:07 pmThere's no footprints of God. No photos or videos or fossil record evidence.
He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.
Friedrich Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und Böse (1886) ch. 4, no. 146
Sadly, the Christians didn't have Nietzsche to teach them morality, because they haven't learned the lesson. They seem to have become the Amalekites, or worse.
“And do you think that unto such as you
A maggot-minded, starved, fanatic crew
God gave a secret, and denied it me?
Well, well—what matters it? Believe that, too!”
― Omar Khayyâm
A maggot-minded, starved, fanatic crew
God gave a secret, and denied it me?
Well, well—what matters it? Believe that, too!”
― Omar Khayyâm
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6002
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6623 times
- Been thanked: 3219 times
Re: Bigfoot, Dogman, Lizard Man, Moth Man, God. Which is more likely?
Post #48Circumcision is mutilation, but it is a far cry from the serious mutilation of young people who are having their breasts and genitals hacked off in the insane belief that they can change their sex. The people promoting this are also claiming to be the good guys. Far from it.boatsnguitars wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 4:41 amYep, it is mutilation - courtesy of the Jesus Cult. Yet, they claim they're the Good Guys....nobspeople wrote: ↑Wed Feb 17, 2021 2:32 pm I watched a Netflix shows a while back about the history of circumcision. It was fascinating both for its history and how many people feel like they were mutulated.
George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
- boatsnguitars
- Banned
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2023 10:09 am
- Has thanked: 477 times
- Been thanked: 580 times
Re: Bigfoot, Dogman, Lizard Man, Moth Man, God. Which is more likely?
Post #49I think consent has a huge role to play, and that makes the difference.brunumb wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 6:41 pmCircumcision is mutilation, but it is a far cry from the serious mutilation of young people who are having their breasts and genitals hacked off in the insane belief that they can change their sex. The people promoting this are also claiming to be the good guys. Far from it.boatsnguitars wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 4:41 amYep, it is mutilation - courtesy of the Jesus Cult. Yet, they claim they're the Good Guys....nobspeople wrote: ↑Wed Feb 17, 2021 2:32 pm I watched a Netflix shows a while back about the history of circumcision. It was fascinating both for its history and how many people feel like they were mutulated.
“And do you think that unto such as you
A maggot-minded, starved, fanatic crew
God gave a secret, and denied it me?
Well, well—what matters it? Believe that, too!”
― Omar Khayyâm
A maggot-minded, starved, fanatic crew
God gave a secret, and denied it me?
Well, well—what matters it? Believe that, too!”
― Omar Khayyâm
- AquinasForGod
- Sage
- Posts: 972
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:29 am
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 71 times
Re: Bigfoot, Dogman, Lizard Man, Moth Man, God. Which is more likely?
Post #50[Replying to nobspeople in post #1]
This shows a profound lack of understanding.
God is a metaphysical being. Those others are not. The types of evidence for each are very different.
Learn the arguments in favor of God according to Atheist and Agnostic philosophers. The evidence is not enough to bring their confidence high enough so they believe in God, but they agree there is evidence.
Your question is like asking, what is more likely mathematical realism or bigfoot?
This shows a profound lack of understanding.
God is a metaphysical being. Those others are not. The types of evidence for each are very different.
Learn the arguments in favor of God according to Atheist and Agnostic philosophers. The evidence is not enough to bring their confidence high enough so they believe in God, but they agree there is evidence.
Your question is like asking, what is more likely mathematical realism or bigfoot?