What would it take for you?

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
nobspeople
Prodigy
Posts: 3187
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:32 am
Has thanked: 1510 times
Been thanked: 824 times

What would it take for you?

Post #1

Post by nobspeople »

Recently started watching a Netflix documentary about Mormonism and how (at least up to this point) the church seemed to be going to any and all means to stop documentation from getting out that, they think, would totally uproot their belief system (though I haven't finished it yet).

So, what would it take, for you, to disavow your religion and religious belief?
Documentation from writers of that time period?
Documentation from current high up leaders?
Testimony of how it's a farce from those who spent the majority of their lives in it, finally seeing their own light?
Science?
Data?
Another, more believable religion?


For those of us who are in the 'been-there-done-that-bought-the-t-shirt' crowd, what was it that caused you to change?
Have a great, potentially godless, day!

User avatar
Tcg
Savant
Posts: 8494
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
Location: Third Stone
Has thanked: 2147 times
Been thanked: 2295 times

Re: What would it take for you?

Post #71

Post by Tcg »

[Replying to Goose in post #62]

The examples continue.

The Bible:

Image

Science:

Image


Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.

- American Atheists


Not believing isn't the same as believing not.

- wiploc


I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.

- Irvin D. Yalom

User avatar
Tcg
Savant
Posts: 8494
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
Location: Third Stone
Has thanked: 2147 times
Been thanked: 2295 times

Re: What would it take for you?

Post #72

Post by Tcg »

[Replying to Goose in post #62]

The examples are almost endless.

The Bible:

Image

Science:

Image


Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.

- American Atheists


Not believing isn't the same as believing not.

- wiploc


I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.

- Irvin D. Yalom

User avatar
brunumb
Savant
Posts: 6002
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 6623 times
Been thanked: 3219 times

Re: What would it take for you?

Post #73

Post by brunumb »

Purple Knight wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:33 pm
JehovahsWitness wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 10:47 pmTHE BIBLE : “All the rivers run into the sea, yet the sea is not full. To the place from which the rivers come, to there and from there they return again.”​—Ecclesiastes 1:7, The Amplified Bible.
At very least, this shows that ancient people weren't as ignorant as everyone seems to think.
The science is not in the observation but in the explanation. It's not hard for people to observe that rivers run into the sea and the sea level doesn't rise. Contemplation of this observation can easily lead to the conclusion that the water somehow is removed and must go back to where it started. No mention is made of the role of rainfall, so for all we know they might have thought that invisible hordes of angels bucketed the water out of the sea. To equate the biblical passage with the hydrological cycle as we understand it is a mighty big stretch.
George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 21109
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 792 times
Been thanked: 1122 times
Contact:

Re: What would it take for you?

Post #74

Post by JehovahsWitness »

Tcg wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:40 pm

Ecclesiastes 1:
5 The sun rises and the sun sets,
and hurries back to where it rises.
We can pretend it doesn't say this, but it does.


Tcg
So does NASA ....

Image
source: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/20 ... her-worlds


You can pretend that planetary science does not recognise the existence of sunsets/sunrises ... but it does.




JW



RELATED POST
Does the bible contain information that harmonises with proven science ?
viewtopic.php?p=1036526#p1036526

Does the bible say God created plants before the sun?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 17#p836617

Does the bible teach the earth is FLAT?
viewtopic.php?p=1032310#p1032310

Did the sun stop shining the day Jesus died?
viewtopic.php?p=1008274#p1008274

Did Joshua report the earth stopped spinning when the sun stood still ?
viewtopic.php?p=855182#p855182

Does the sun really set?
viewtopic.php?p=1036551#p1036551

Does the bible say God created plants BEFORE he created the sun/light?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 17#p836617

When is the Passover "New Moon"?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 96#p911296
To learn more please go to other posts related to...

THE SUN , BIBLE & SCIENCE and ...THE 7 CREATIVE DAYS OF GENESIS
Last edited by JehovahsWitness on Wed Aug 31, 2022 11:01 pm, edited 3 times in total.
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681


"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" -
Romans 14:8

User avatar
brunumb
Savant
Posts: 6002
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 6623 times
Been thanked: 3219 times

Re: What would it take for you?

Post #75

Post by brunumb »

JehovahsWitness wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 4:43 am You can pretend that planetary science does not recognise the existence of sunsets/sunrises ... but it does.
The words do not scientifically describe the mechanism behind the observations we make.
And the sun does not "hurry back to where it rises"! :shock:
George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.

User avatar
Goose
Guru
Posts: 1707
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: The Great White North
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: What would it take for you?

Post #76

Post by Goose »

brunumb wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 8:06 pm
Goose wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:44 pm
"Unlike Crossan...I believe that the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ burial are largely consistent with the archaeological evidence. Although archaeology does not prove there was a follower of Jesus named Joseph of Arimathea or that Pontius Pilate granted his request for Jesus’ body, the Gospel accounts describing Jesus’ removal from the cross and burial are consistent with archaeological evidence and with Jewish law." - [Jodi Magness]
:( What science is involved in removing a body from a cross and burying it?
In this case archaeology.
Things atheists say:

"Is it the case [that torturing and killing babies for fun is immoral]? Prove it." - Bust Nak

"For the record...I think the Gospels are intentional fiction and Jesus wasn't a real guy." – Difflugia

"Julius Caesar and Jesus both didn't exist." - brunumb

"...most atheists have no arguments or evidence to disprove God." – unknown soldier (a.k.a. the banned member Jagella)

User avatar
Goose
Guru
Posts: 1707
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 6:49 pm
Location: The Great White North
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: What would it take for you?

Post #77

Post by Goose »

nobspeople wrote: Thu Mar 11, 2021 1:45 pmSo, what would it take, for you, to disavow your religion and religious belief?
The same as any other belief I currently hold to be true, prove it false.
Documentation from writers of that time period?
That would be a very good start.
Documentation from current high up leaders?
If they had proved the belief false.
Testimony of how it's a farce from those who spent the majority of their lives in it, finally seeing their own light?
Same answer as above.
Science?
Data?
Another, more believable religion?
Same answer as above.
Things atheists say:

"Is it the case [that torturing and killing babies for fun is immoral]? Prove it." - Bust Nak

"For the record...I think the Gospels are intentional fiction and Jesus wasn't a real guy." – Difflugia

"Julius Caesar and Jesus both didn't exist." - brunumb

"...most atheists have no arguments or evidence to disprove God." – unknown soldier (a.k.a. the banned member Jagella)

benchwarmer
Guru
Posts: 2329
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:40 am
Has thanked: 2004 times
Been thanked: 771 times

Re: What would it take for you?

Post #78

Post by benchwarmer »

Purple Knight wrote: Fri Apr 09, 2021 11:33 pm Also, we say the sun moves. We say that, despite knowing full well that it doesn't. The sun rises. The sun sets. The sun disappears below the horizon.
Just because I like to pick nits, technically the sun does move. In fact it's moving pretty fast, about 220 kilometers per second.

https://astronomy.com/magazine/ask-astr ... -milky-way

User avatar
The Barbarian
Sage
Posts: 876
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:40 pm
Has thanked: 204 times
Been thanked: 586 times

Re: What would it take for you?

Post #79

Post by The Barbarian »

Coming at it from the other way, the single most compelling fact for me, is that Jesus' apostles, teaching that He rose from the grave, walked and ate with them for a time, were willing to suffer torture and death, rather than recant their beliefs.

Evidence that these men didn't exist, or that none of them were willing to suffer martyrdom would go a long way toward shaking my faith in Christianity.

benchwarmer
Guru
Posts: 2329
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:40 am
Has thanked: 2004 times
Been thanked: 771 times

Re: What would it take for you?

Post #80

Post by benchwarmer »

The Barbarian wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 11:26 am Coming at it from the other way, the single most compelling fact for me, is that Jesus' apostles, teaching that He rose from the grave, walked and ate with them for a time, were willing to suffer torture and death, rather than recant their beliefs.

Evidence that these men didn't exist, or that none of them were willing to suffer martyrdom would go a long way toward shaking my faith in Christianity.
Yet we have Islamists who are not only willing to die for their beliefs, but do so without being tortured. Supposedly, they choose death to further their cause, rather than simply just be willing to die if they don't recant their beliefs.

This seems to point to Islam as the stronger choice doesn't it?

I personally find this completely uncompelling simply due to the fact that we have evidence that more than one faith has martyrs. They can't all be right. The could all be wrong though...

Post Reply