Recently started watching a Netflix documentary about Mormonism and how (at least up to this point) the church seemed to be going to any and all means to stop documentation from getting out that, they think, would totally uproot their belief system (though I haven't finished it yet).
So, what would it take, for you, to disavow your religion and religious belief?
Documentation from writers of that time period?
Documentation from current high up leaders?
Testimony of how it's a farce from those who spent the majority of their lives in it, finally seeing their own light?
Science?
Data?
Another, more believable religion?
For those of us who are in the 'been-there-done-that-bought-the-t-shirt' crowd, what was it that caused you to change?
What would it take for you?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:32 am
- Has thanked: 1510 times
- Been thanked: 824 times
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8495
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2147 times
- Been thanked: 2295 times
Re: What would it take for you?
Post #91What verifiable evidence do you rely on to convince you that this isn't the case?The Barbarian wrote: ↑Sat Apr 10, 2021 9:45 pmAnd that, if confirmed, would shake my confidence in Christianity.Tcg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 10, 2021 6:22 pmIf the apostles, or other devotees of Christianity, perpetrated a fraud concerning the resurrection, it wouldn't be hard to perpetrate a further fraud concerning the deaths of the apostles.The Barbarian wrote: ↑Sat Apr 10, 2021 4:16 pm If the Apostles were perpetrating a fraud concerning His resurrection, I doubt very much that they'd be willing to die for it.
Tcg
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6002
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6627 times
- Been thanked: 3222 times
Re: What would it take for you?
Post #92What exactly do you consider divine inspiration to entail? The examples we have been given so far do nothing to demonstrate that the biblical writers knew anything more than could be ascribed simply to observant human beings without any divine assistance.Purple Knight wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:50 am The claim is that the Bible was divinely inspired, not that it wasn't written by people who have many of the same linguistic limitations as we do, which is why it's tough to be fair and expect more of them than we do of NASA.
George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
- 1213
- Savant
- Posts: 11467
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 327 times
- Been thanked: 373 times
Re: What would it take for you?
Post #93For me Bible is mainly about what is good/right and righteousness. If someone would say he found an old scripture that tells, “no murder is not wrong, you can kill as much as you want, don’t care what Jesus says”, I think it would be wrong. In my opinion it is not a matter of belief, but about right understanding. So, to counter my “belief”, one should be able to reason why it is not wrong to murder for example.nobspeople wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 1:45 pm ...So, what would it take, for you, to disavow your religion and religious belief?
Documentation from writers of that time period?
Documentation from current high up leaders?
...
- The Barbarian
- Sage
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:40 pm
- Has thanked: 204 times
- Been thanked: 586 times
Re: What would it take for you?
Post #94And that, if confirmed, would shake my confidence in Christianity.
Pretty much anything verified. That's what "confirmed"means.What verifiable evidence do you rely on to convince you that this isn't the case?
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8495
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2147 times
- Been thanked: 2295 times
Re: What would it take for you?
Post #95I wasn't asking for a definition of the word, "verified." I was asking what specific verifiable evidence has convinced you. On what verifiable evidence do you base your conclusion that the apostles actually died for their faith?The Barbarian wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 3:49 amAnd that, if confirmed, would shake my confidence in Christianity.
Pretty much anything verified. That's what "confirmed"means.What verifiable evidence do you rely on to convince you that this isn't the case?
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- The Barbarian
- Sage
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:40 pm
- Has thanked: 204 times
- Been thanked: 586 times
Re: What would it take for you?
Post #96No one has presented any so far. The question was "what would it take for you to disavow your religion and religious belief?"I wasn't asking for a definition of the word, "verified." I was asking what specific verifiable evidence has convinced you.
I've pointed out one way. So far, no one's presented any of that.
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8495
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2147 times
- Been thanked: 2295 times
Re: What would it take for you?
Post #97That's not the question I've asked you. Here's the question that for some reason you cut out of your response:The Barbarian wrote: ↑Mon Apr 12, 2021 12:15 amNo one has presented any so far. The question was "what would it take for you to disavow your religion and religious belief?"I wasn't asking for a definition of the word, "verified." I was asking what specific verifiable evidence has convinced you.
I've pointed out one way. So far, no one's presented any of that.
I asked because I couldn't find any. Given how important this is to your faith, I assumed you'd have an answer. Perhaps I was mistaken."On what verifiable evidence do you base your conclusion that the apostles actually died for their faith?"
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- Purple Knight
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3512
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 6:00 pm
- Has thanked: 1134 times
- Been thanked: 733 times
Re: What would it take for you?
Post #98Very observant, very intelligent human beings, given the limitations of knowledge at that time, but yes. I'm not saying any of this proves Christianity, but the start of this conversation was JW saying that scripture and science agree. Often, they do. So in this case he's right.
I'm an atheist so I probably wouldn't know it if I saw it. Even if someone knew more than they possibly could, and had so many hits in proportion to misses (gotta factor in misses too) that it was unlikely they'd be getting that success ratio by chance, I'd gravitate towards a slightly less extreme explanation, such as memory transmission. There are already studies that suggest memories can be genetically transmitted, or even spontaneously transmitted, so this is almost certainly where I'd go.
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8495
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2147 times
- Been thanked: 2295 times
Re: What would it take for you?
Post #99Actually JW stated this:Purple Knight wrote: ↑Mon Apr 12, 2021 1:03 am
I'm not saying any of this proves Christianity, but the start of this conversation was JW saying that scripture and science agree. Often, they do. So in this case he's right.
This is a universal claim, not an "Often, they do." claim. If any exceptions are presented, and they have been, then her universal claim is false, and it is.JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 9:05 am In my opinion, good (accurate/proven) science always agrees with scripture.
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- The Barbarian
- Sage
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:40 pm
- Has thanked: 204 times
- Been thanked: 586 times
Re: What would it take for you?
Post #100No one has presented any so far. The question was "what would it take for you to disavow your religion and religious belief?"
I've pointed out one way. So far, no one's presented any of that.
Which is O.K. We'll go off-topic and address your question.
https://overviewbible.com/how-did-the-apostles-die/
I've pointed out one way. So far, no one's presented any of that.
I know. That was the question in the OP. For some reason, you didn't want to talk about that one.
Which is O.K. We'll go off-topic and address your question.
https://overviewbible.com/how-did-the-apostles-die/