Because of faith faith faith faith - ad nauseam - is normally the answer. But that's an excuse and doesn't really answer the question for many (including many believers if you listen to enough of them).
Surely, if God can create all that is, it could prove itself to everyone, yeah?
Some say this would, somehow, 'cheapen' the experience or that by proving itself to everyone, less people would (again, somehow?) not follow god. That is also an excuse.
What mentally sound person would see irrefutable proof that God is real and that everything God 'said' is real, and still say 'meh... I don't believe it'? Not many I'd suspect! And even if 'many' did do this, wouldn't it be a lot less than those who don't have faith in it and perish?
So for centuries of looking, no proof has been found. Why is that?
Some would say it's 'because there is no god'. And surely that may be true.
But could it also be true that God, creator of all things, is simply forcing people to 'have faith' to find him?
What benefit does that serve such a loving being, to see the inevitable eternal damnation of many of the beings it's said to love?!?
Why can't God be proven?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:32 am
- Has thanked: 1510 times
- Been thanked: 824 times
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2572 times
Re: Why can't God be proven?
Post #81How might we ever get us the first clod of clay, if we don't use us atoms to do it?Eloi wrote: ↑Mon Sep 06, 2021 12:39 pm This: "a heap of clay gathered on its own and suddenly lived" is this:... with less words.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Sun Sep 05, 2021 2:15 pm Atoms came together and, owing to their properties, some of em bunched up into chemicals. These chemicals, in turn, according to their properties, bunched up, and next thing ya know, humans have created the means of our own eternal destruction.
That's best we can tell. To propose a"creator", in the common religious sense, is unwarranted.
I propose it's far more rational, and complies with much supporting evidence, to conclude life arose from the atom clumping to become the chemical clumping, to the life being. And NEVER have I propose a mud dauber was there arubbing her tiny little mud dauber hands together.
And that ain't to pick on the mud daubers there - every single one of em I ever met never tried to convince me their queen was ressurrected.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6002
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6627 times
- Been thanked: 3222 times
Re: Why can't God be proven?
Post #82My turn. I believe all people know deep inside them that God is not real, some just want to suppress that idea, because they don't like the idea that we are not that special and when we die that is the end.
George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6002
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6627 times
- Been thanked: 3222 times
Re: Why can't God be proven?
Post #83Just as when a panel of male religious elders decides that your daughter is lying and has not been sexually abused, you can be 100% certain that they are correct.JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Mon Sep 06, 2021 11:02 am Certainty is a personal conviction which may or may not be based on fact. A man can be 100% certain his wife didn't cheat on him even if she comes home late, smelling of alcohol with strange men's telephone numbers stuffed in her bra. In short if one has information and one is entirely convinced by it , one can be said one know with 100% certainty there is a God.
George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
- Diagoras
- Guru
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2019 12:47 am
- Has thanked: 170 times
- Been thanked: 579 times
Re: Why can't God be proven?
Post #84Well, mathematical proofs are surely held to that 100% standard...otseng wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 5:48 pmBecause God is not math?opening post wrote:So for centuries of looking, no proof has been found. Why is that?Yes, that would satisfy 'proof' for the vast majority of humans <..>otseng wrote:What do you mean by "proof"? Do you mean like a mathematical proof? A conclusion that is 100% certain?
Why place such a high burden that God needs to be proven with 100% certainty when practically nothing else is held to such a standard?
In any systematic system of investigation (such as science), the importance of the thing being proved generally has a direct bearing on the standard of proof required. Lives would be at risk if we contented ourselves with only a 95% confidence in the equations of gravity, for example. I suggest that God is 'important enough' to warrant a high standard of proof.
However, I don't believe that a god could be proved to exist by mathematics alone - it's the wrong 'tool for the job'. I also am inclined toward the claim that logic alone can't prove a god exists (e.g. Hume: "Whatever we conceive as existent, we can also conceive as non-existent.")
I read the OP more along the lines of:
"Whenever we've searched for the true reason behind a particular phenomenon, we've found some aspect of natural law to adequately explain it. We've never found God as the only explanation."
Recognising that my changing the OP question slightly might be constructing a straw man (or shifting the goalposts?), I'd answer that the cumulative successes of scientific explanations over the centuries effectively leaves less and less 'room' for any theory of God - and evidence for it - to be found that is still congruent with (i.e. 'in agreement or harmony with-') proven scientific fact.
There's some debate here about whether either a '1' or a '7' is strictly possible. Given the symmetry of the spectrum though, it seems reasonable to demand the same standard of evidence from anyone claiming to be a '1.1' as from a '6.9'. It's my opinion that evidence for the former is what's being claimed as 'not found'.otseng wrote:I agree with Dawkins spectrum of belief where he says "the existence of God is a scientific hypothesis like any other." There are gradations of belief and people can fall anywhere in the spectrum of belief.
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:32 am
- Has thanked: 1510 times
- Been thanked: 824 times
Re: Why can't God be proven?
Post #85[Replying to otseng in post #55]
Yet it doesn't
So either it can't
Doesn't want to
Or isn't real
God is the high standard, is it not? So why excuse god's inability for not making sure it's able to be proven to those who as it?Why place such a high burden that God needs to be proven with 100% certainty when practically nothing else is held to such a standard?
The excuses for god are quite tiring. Listen: god (if it's what people say it is; all knowing, powerful, et al) can provide proof of it being real, to those asking, in ways that would convince themIn history, how can anything be proven to be true? Same with sociology, economics, politics, law, etc.
Yet it doesn't
So either it can't
Doesn't want to
Or isn't real
Nor does it claim to, as I'm sure you know. But this isn't about 'science', this is about god coughing out and not proving itself to those who seek it.Even science cannot prove anything.
Have a great, potentially godless, day!
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:32 am
- Has thanked: 1510 times
- Been thanked: 824 times
Re: Why can't God be proven?
Post #86I suppose it, like everything 'bible', it comes down to how one defines 'righteousness'. If one thinks it's only something you can get from god, sure. But I find it silly (and almost belittling) to suggest that one can only be righteous if they are 'of god'. But some people love to belittle people and thus, raise up their deity.Purple Knight wrote: ↑Fri Sep 03, 2021 9:30 pmI don't think it's silly at all. If you knew God existed, of course you'd do his bidding. But if on some level we all think it's a bunch of prehistoric nonsense, then only those who find real righteousness in the words will follow them.nobspeople wrote: ↑Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:46 am [Replying to 1213 in post #2]
This seems to be saying you can't be good and righteous if you know that god exist which is ludicrous in every sense of the word.I think it is because the point is not to believe in the existence of God, but to be righteous, to have right understanding of good and right and the desire to do what is good and right.
Have a great, potentially godless, day!
- otseng
- Savant
- Posts: 20522
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Has thanked: 197 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
- Contact:
Re: Why can't God be proven?
Post #87It sounds as if it's more your standard than God's. God's standard is actually to have faith.nobspeople wrote: ↑Tue Sep 07, 2021 8:12 am God is the high standard, is it not? So why excuse god's inability for not making sure it's able to be proven to those who as it?
(Heb 10:38) Now the just shall live by faith: but if [any man] draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him.
The evidence and arguments are quite convincing enough for me. And apparently enough for many others as well.The excuses for god are quite tiring. Listen: god (if it's what people say it is; all knowing, powerful, et al) can provide proof of it being real, to those asking, in ways that would convince them
Even Jesus while he was on earth never made it clear he was God, or even the Messiah for that matter. Though he did do things to confirm he was from God, he left a wide margin for having faith.
As for God being omnipotent, I would not agree with that. There are many things that God cannot do and will not do.
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:32 am
- Has thanked: 1510 times
- Been thanked: 824 times
Re: Why can't God be proven?
Post #88[Replying to otseng in post #87]
Yet, seems faith is all that it's offering, which isn't very loving at all to me and many. But of course, to believers, this 'faith' is super loving, which is nothing more than an excuse IMO.
It never ceases to amaze me (and others) of the amount of excuses believers make for their lackluster magician in order to justify their chosen lifestyle agenda.
It shouldn't, knowing the basics of how people work. If god's only good for one thing, it's definitively surprising us with its inability to do much of anything.
The rebuttal is something like: "well, if they were shown and didn't believe why should god show us now?" Which is utterly stupid comparison to make, assuming god loves humanity. God should never stop showing himself to those who seek it.
But that hasn't and isn't happening to everyone.
The rebuttal for that is something like: "You don't know that!"
But I can tell you, after searching for a long, long time, he hasn't shown proof to me one iota.
Maybe he just doesn't care about me?
The standard of many, not just mine. I'd think that, if this super loving god is loving, he'd want to ensure everyone has the ability to know, not just have faith.It sounds as if it's more your standard than God's.
Yet, seems faith is all that it's offering, which isn't very loving at all to me and many. But of course, to believers, this 'faith' is super loving, which is nothing more than an excuse IMO.
It never ceases to amaze me (and others) of the amount of excuses believers make for their lackluster magician in order to justify their chosen lifestyle agenda.
It shouldn't, knowing the basics of how people work. If god's only good for one thing, it's definitively surprising us with its inability to do much of anything.
That's great. For you. But there are those that god knows that need more than talking in riddles, 'his word' with its inconsistencies, the lack of proof and the need to rely on 'faith'. God know this and does nothing.The evidence and arguments are quite convincing enough for me.
Today and even back then, there were those who didn't believe.Though he did do things to confirm he was from God,
The rebuttal is something like: "well, if they were shown and didn't believe why should god show us now?" Which is utterly stupid comparison to make, assuming god loves humanity. God should never stop showing himself to those who seek it.
But that hasn't and isn't happening to everyone.
The rebuttal for that is something like: "You don't know that!"
But I can tell you, after searching for a long, long time, he hasn't shown proof to me one iota.
Maybe he just doesn't care about me?
Have a great, potentially godless, day!
- POI
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3526
- Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2021 5:22 pm
- Has thanked: 1619 times
- Been thanked: 1083 times
Re: Why can't God be proven?
Post #90You do not think if everyone KNEW they were being watches and judged of their actions --- (murder, rape, theft), they would do it all the same? Really? Anyone who has ever committed murder, rape, and theft, always knows they are being watched, and are going to be held accountable?
Because I was indoctrinated in the religion. I thought God existed, so I prayed to Him. After about 30+ years of feeling I was talking to myself, I started to question the faith; and began more extensive investigation(s).
1. So, is God playing hide and seek with me, or...
2. Am I too stupid to know He is actually contacting me, or...
3. Am I too plagued with evil to know He is/was calling on me?
If God answers your prayers, please pray for God to contact me, or, have God tell you something about me, so you can share that knowledge here with me? This will prove He speaks to you. Otherwise, I'm not so sure God speaks to you at all; if you claim He ever has?
In case anyone is wondering... The avatar quote states the following:
"I asked God for a bike, but I know God doesn't work that way. So I stole a bike and asked for forgiveness."
"I asked God for a bike, but I know God doesn't work that way. So I stole a bike and asked for forgiveness."