In this day and age, people can find information in many places over the internet. My concern is that I suspect lots of people aren't good at discriminating between good and bad sources. Being able to know what good sources are helps to ensure that the information you're acquiring is accurate and credible.
Take covid-19 information, for instance. I've talked to many people who refuse to get the covid-19 vaccine based on various information they've heard and read about on the internet. When I question some of them by asking for their sources, I noticed that they tend to have bad sources. They might reference a lone doctor, one not even an expert in the field. They may reference a Youtube video or some post circulating on Facebook with a bunch of smart sounding info. strung together. I suspect we'd find the same problem when it comes to those that deny the validity of the theory of evolution. And more relevant to this section, I suspect we'd find the same problem when it comes to many of those who accept the the view that Jesus was a complete myth - the Christ Myth Theory. All of these things remind me of the people that tend to accept conspiracy theories.
For debate:
1. Is is wrong to read from non-expert sources?
2. For those of you who don't accept expert view, have you read the expert view to begin with? Or do you find that others who go against the experts tend to not even read expert views?
3. What ideas do you have to solve this big problem?
Experts vs. Conspiracy theories
Moderator: Moderators
- AgnosticBoy
- Guru
- Posts: 1620
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:44 pm
- Has thanked: 204 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
- Contact:
Experts vs. Conspiracy theories
Post #1- Proud forum owner ∣ The Agnostic Forum
- As a non-partisan, I like to be on the side of truth. - AB
- As a non-partisan, I like to be on the side of truth. - AB
- AgnosticBoy
- Guru
- Posts: 1620
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:44 pm
- Has thanked: 204 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
- Contact:
Re: Experts vs. Conspiracy theories
Post #2I'm not against reading non-expert sources on important topics. But if you're going to do that then you should also read up on what the experts say, as well. Some times the experts are wrong. Some times the non-experts are right or they may come up with views and evidence that the experts might have overlooked or might not have covered. However, the expert sources should be given more weight since their explanations and views come with training and they are more informed. I'd only disagree with the experts or accept some of the points from non-experts when there is good logic and evidence to support the non-expert side.
I find this to be the case a lot, even on this forum. I don't want to mention names, but when someone tells me that the experts simply "believe" that Jesus was a historical person, then I have to scratch my head and wonder if that person understands historical methods. I question if they've read from any experts or if they even care. ARe they just simply reading or accepting information from sources that already supports their pre-existing views.AgnosticBoy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 08, 2021 9:57 pm 2. Or do you find that others who go against the experts tend to not even read expert views?
Start teaching critical thinking to kids in school. That's a start!
- Proud forum owner ∣ The Agnostic Forum
- As a non-partisan, I like to be on the side of truth. - AB
- As a non-partisan, I like to be on the side of truth. - AB
-
- Savant
- Posts: 8188
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:05 am
- Has thanked: 958 times
- Been thanked: 3550 times
Re: Experts vs. Conspiracy theories
Post #3So this is about questioning experts rather than conspiracy theories, so that's ok.
It is a good question. Sometimes experts or Authorities should be questioned. They question each other all the time. Bible apologists sometimes seem to think that 'Science' (broadly) works like a religion: a bunch of people say something in a book and we are supposed to believe it. They even call it 'Religionism'. As though they know that's not the rational or logical way to do it, and they know they don't do that as they also say 'Science is always changing its' mind'.
Obviously there is a sliding scale of consensus by experts about various hypotheses and ongoing areas of research. These do get firmed up by confirming data (or demolished ) and eventually we get a 'Scientific Law'. And a good bit of credence resides in those.
Of course, we have to guard against experts making pronouncements outside their field of expertise. A Phd in Molecular biology is not necessarily an expert in ancient history, so his Authority on whether the Nativity stories are real is no better than mine, frankly.
It is a good question. Sometimes experts or Authorities should be questioned. They question each other all the time. Bible apologists sometimes seem to think that 'Science' (broadly) works like a religion: a bunch of people say something in a book and we are supposed to believe it. They even call it 'Religionism'. As though they know that's not the rational or logical way to do it, and they know they don't do that as they also say 'Science is always changing its' mind'.
Obviously there is a sliding scale of consensus by experts about various hypotheses and ongoing areas of research. These do get firmed up by confirming data (or demolished ) and eventually we get a 'Scientific Law'. And a good bit of credence resides in those.
Of course, we have to guard against experts making pronouncements outside their field of expertise. A Phd in Molecular biology is not necessarily an expert in ancient history, so his Authority on whether the Nativity stories are real is no better than mine, frankly.
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6002
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6627 times
- Been thanked: 3222 times
Re: Experts vs. Conspiracy theories
Post #5Unfortunately, religious indoctrination usually starts way earlier. Later on, cognitive dissonance is enough to suppress any critical thinking skills.
George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
-
- Savant
- Posts: 8188
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:05 am
- Has thanked: 958 times
- Been thanked: 3550 times
Re: Experts vs. Conspiracy theories
Post #6I would love to teach critical thinking in schools, if only for the fun of chucking schoolchalk at the ones chewing gum at the back of the class.
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:32 am
- Has thanked: 1510 times
- Been thanked: 824 times
Re: Experts vs. Conspiracy theories
Post #7[Replying to AgnosticBoy in post #1]
2) Most people are lazy and want to find sources that only prescribe to their ideal I've found
3) Better education, from the earliest age, is necessary. Public schools need to be taught science and math and not have to worry about poor behaving kids; leave the philosophy to colleges or churches or home dinner tables.
1) Wrong? It depends on what you're trying to get I think. If you want to 'hear all sides', might not be a bad idea. But if you're looking for informed sources, might want to stick with experts (but that begs the question, who is an expert?)For debate:
1. Is is wrong to read from non-expert sources?
2. For those of you who don't accept expert view, have you read the expert view to begin with? Or do you find that others who go against the experts tend to not even read expert views?
3. What ideas do you have to solve this big problem?
2) Most people are lazy and want to find sources that only prescribe to their ideal I've found
3) Better education, from the earliest age, is necessary. Public schools need to be taught science and math and not have to worry about poor behaving kids; leave the philosophy to colleges or churches or home dinner tables.
Have a great, potentially godless, day!
- 1213
- Savant
- Posts: 11472
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 327 times
- Been thanked: 374 times
Re: Experts vs. Conspiracy theories
Post #8I think it is not wrong and I think it can be good to read different sources.
I don't accept claims on basis is it said by expert or not. For me the crucial things is who has best arguments, not who has the best title.AgnosticBoy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 08, 2021 9:57 pm2. For those of you who don't accept expert view, have you read the expert view to begin with? Or do you find that others who go against the experts tend to not even read expert views?
I solve this by looking who has the best reasoning and evidence to support the claim.
- AgnosticBoy
- Guru
- Posts: 1620
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:44 pm
- Has thanked: 204 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
- Contact:
Re: Experts vs. Conspiracy theories
Post #10This is precisely what I suspect is the underlying psychology behind a lot of the conspiracy theorists thinking. It may also be selective, like when someone rejects the experts in certain cases but not in others. That may depend on the subject matter, whether we're dealing with historical matters, the Theory of Evolution, or some other matter.nobspeople wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 12:14 pm 2) Most people are lazy and want to find sources that only prescribe to their ideal I've found
Last edited by AgnosticBoy on Fri Sep 10, 2021 2:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Proud forum owner ∣ The Agnostic Forum
- As a non-partisan, I like to be on the side of truth. - AB
- As a non-partisan, I like to be on the side of truth. - AB