Link below, for your viewing pleasure.
Not to turn this into a 'theist aren't as smart as atheists' debate. What I found interesting is, from the article: "Religion is an instinct, they say, and people who can rise above instincts are more intelligent than those who rely on them."
Most everyone has a 'routine': wake up, brush teeth, shower, coffee, phone scroll, dress for work, take the same way to work, go to lunch at X time, leave at Y time, get home, take off your shoes, grab a drink, walk the dog, cook, TV/read, news, sleep, repeat (for example).
I found this concept fascinating.
And it makes a lot of sense: religious people (christians here, going forward) are very ritualistic in not only their views on religion but their actions of it, as well: baptisms, communions, prayers, religious services, systematic reading of the bible only (or at least, majorly).
Instinct could be why some feel it necessary to attribute morality, for example, to god. It's what 'we've always done'. This could also be the reason why there is so much fear among some christians for 'change': can't marry that person of a different race or same sex; guys can't have long hair; can't drink caffeine; can't dance; must be republican; must go to church on this day; must get married in a church; must be baptized; etc (it's worth noting these beliefs aren't shared will all christians, simply giving examples from some christians).
For discussion:
How is religion and the belief in it and god, NOT an instinct?
https://www.livescience.com/59361-why-a ... igent.html
Religion is an instinct
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:32 am
- Has thanked: 1510 times
- Been thanked: 824 times
- tam
- Savant
- Posts: 6443
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:59 pm
- Has thanked: 353 times
- Been thanked: 324 times
- Contact:
Re: Religion is an instinct
Post #31Peace to you,
If you were to attempt to go all the way back to the root of a tradition, I suppose that root could be instinctively based, but it could also be based on something else. The tradition of eating only fish on a Friday has nothing to do with instinct; that is just a rule/tradition that a religion made, that some people accepted.
(Please note that I am not suggesting instinct is good or bad, or even that instinct must be based on something false. Mankind has sought out the spiritual, the Spirit/Creator in various ways, in all cultures, for as far back as we can find evidence. Is that because it is instinctive (for whatever reason)... and/or... is that because the spiritual and Spirit exist, and we have that knowing inside of us? Therefore, we seek because there is someone TO seek, even someone who is calling to us?)
Peace again to you,
your servant and a slave of Christ,
tammy
Can you explain how that would change the point from my previous post?nobspeople wrote: ↑Mon May 02, 2022 2:16 pm [Replying to tam in post #29]
What I got from it was the need for people to believe as if that need was an instinct, not religion itself.The article failed to demonstrate that religion is an instinct.
Sure, but since those things do not demonstrate that a theist is more instinctual than an atheist, might I ask what your point was in bringing them up?It's important to note the things I listed were from me, not the article and shouldn't be taken to discredit (or credit) the article itself. The idea was, as you said, routine, nothing more.If those are supposed to be examples of instinctual behavior, then atheists would be every bit as instinctual as religious people. Just in different things. This would undermine the the 'hypothesis' of the study.
I actually see tradition as the exact opposite of instinct. Traditions must be handed down and taught (sometimes in precise detail). How does that describe instinct?I see tradition could be instinctually based. That doesn't mean tradition is good or bad, just something people partake in for no other good reason than it's 'part of humanity', in a sense.I don't see how you're describing instinct here; rather than tradition and/or rule-following.
If you were to attempt to go all the way back to the root of a tradition, I suppose that root could be instinctively based, but it could also be based on something else. The tradition of eating only fish on a Friday has nothing to do with instinct; that is just a rule/tradition that a religion made, that some people accepted.
(Please note that I am not suggesting instinct is good or bad, or even that instinct must be based on something false. Mankind has sought out the spiritual, the Spirit/Creator in various ways, in all cultures, for as far back as we can find evidence. Is that because it is instinctive (for whatever reason)... and/or... is that because the spiritual and Spirit exist, and we have that knowing inside of us? Therefore, we seek because there is someone TO seek, even someone who is calling to us?)
Correlates what things with religion and religious viewing? Can you please be specific? Because the article fails to prove the hypothesis that 'religion' is an instinct. The article also lists various problems associated with that hypothesis.Yes. As can stupidity, racism, loving, smelly, tall, fatness, etc. The article was attempting to show correlations and, according to the findings, correlates these things with religion and religious viewing.That can apply to both atheists and theists.
What does your comment have to do with the point about instinct? Mine was directly related (the instinctive reaction to being struck on one cheek is NOT to turn the other cheek).Teachings are only as good as the students who apply said teachings.Indeed, there is even this Teacher in a faith who actually teaches others to rise above that instinct and well, you know... turn the other cheek.
Peace again to you,
your servant and a slave of Christ,
tammy
- Non-religious Christian spirituality
- For Christ (who is the Spirit)
- For Christ (who is the Spirit)
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:32 am
- Has thanked: 1510 times
- Been thanked: 824 times
Re: Religion is an instinct
Post #32[Replying to tam in post #31]
I said "...was the need for people to believe as if that need was an instinct, not religion itself."
Religion and the need to have/believe in a religion are two different things
Have a great, potentially godless, day all!
You said "The article failed to demonstrate that religion is an instinct." To me, you were talking about the 'thing' religion.Can you explain how that would change the point from my previous post?
I said "...was the need for people to believe as if that need was an instinct, not religion itself."
Religion and the need to have/believe in a religion are two different things
It was a verbalization of thought, created by the topic that relatesbut since those things do not demonstrate that a theist is more instinctual than an atheist, might I ask what your point was in bringing them up?
The need to do something like this is instinctual I believe. If you don't, that's, of course, fine.I actually see tradition as the exact opposite of instinct. Traditions must be handed down and taught (sometimes in precise detail). How does that describe instinct?
Humans have an instinct to believe in something. It's really very simple in that regard.Correlates what things with religion and religious viewing? Can you please be specific? Because the article fails to prove the hypothesis that 'religion' is an instinct. The article also lists various problems associated with that hypothesis.
It was a response to your comment about teachingWhat does your comment have to do with the point about instinct?
Have a great, potentially godless, day all!
Have a great, potentially godless, day!
- Miles
- Savant
- Posts: 5179
- Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 4:19 pm
- Has thanked: 434 times
- Been thanked: 1614 times
Re: Religion is an instinct
Post #33.
---Picking up on an old post I evidently missed---
.
---Picking up on an old post I evidently missed---
Good for you. Join the crowd.
Mature enough for what?The point is we will never be mature enough.
In light of the thread's subject, "religion, an instinct or not," your point here is, what?Listen our human leaders, they say childish things many times, hehehe.
.
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:32 am
- Has thanked: 1510 times
- Been thanked: 824 times
Re: Religion is an instinct
Post #34You forgot to end your post with 'hehehe'. That makes ALL the difference here!Miles wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 2:47 pm .
---Picking up on an old post I evidently missed---
Good for you. Join the crowd.
Mature enough for what?The point is we will never be mature enough.
In light of the thread's subject, "religion, an instinct or not," your point here is, what?Listen our human leaders, they say childish things many times, hehehe.
.
Have a great, potentially godless, day!