Many times when the teachings of Jesus and his person are discussed, reference is made to a particular interpretation of what his words may be indicating. For example, I have read a discussion about a Jesus who denies or contradicts the Law of Moses. But that is an incorrect way of understanding Jesus, just like a political Jesus is or one who does not admit rich people among his followers, as if honest possessions were sin.
Can those who debate the teachings of Jesus at least begin to ascertain that the Jesus they suppose is the one that Scripture shows us and not an imaginary Jesus?
This topic is to analyze the need to be serious in the use of terms and premises, so that the debates adjust to the truth, and the conclusions are more accurate.
What is the Jesus you have in mind? Does it correspond to the Jesus of the Bible? Can you really know what Jesus was like?
The Jesus to whom atheists and others often refer
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Banned
- Posts: 1775
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:31 pm
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 213 times
- Contact:
Re: The Jesus to whom atheists and others often refer
Post #21There is an interesting information about the Sabbath Day in our Biblical Encyclopedia.
Rabbinic Sabbath Restrictions.
The Sabbath was originally intended to be a joyous, spiritually upbuilding time. But in their zeal to distinguish themselves from the Gentiles as much as possible, the Jewish religious leaders, especially after the return from Babylonian exile, gradually made it a burdensome thing by greatly increasing the Sabbath restrictions to 39, with innumerable lesser restrictions. These, when compiled, filled two large volumes. For example, catching a flea was forbidden as hunting. A sufferer could not be given relief unless death threatened. A bone could not be set, nor a sprain bandaged. The true purpose of the Sabbath was made void by these Jewish religious leaders, for they made the people slaves to tradition, instead of having the Sabbath serve men to the honor of God. (Mt 15:3, 6; 23:2-4; Mr 2:27) When Jesus’ disciples picked grain and rubbed it in their hands to eat, they evidently were accused on two counts, namely, harvesting and threshing on the Sabbath. (Lu 6:1, 2) The rabbis had a saying: “The sins of everyone who strictly observes every law of the Sabbath, though he be an idol worshiper, are forgiven.”
From https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1200003778
Would Jesus really be violating the Mosaic Sabbath Law if he broke any of these "sabbatical" demands of the rabbis that were just a particular way of interpreting that specific law? ... or rather Jesus would only be "violating" a human addition to the law?
Rabbinic Sabbath Restrictions.
The Sabbath was originally intended to be a joyous, spiritually upbuilding time. But in their zeal to distinguish themselves from the Gentiles as much as possible, the Jewish religious leaders, especially after the return from Babylonian exile, gradually made it a burdensome thing by greatly increasing the Sabbath restrictions to 39, with innumerable lesser restrictions. These, when compiled, filled two large volumes. For example, catching a flea was forbidden as hunting. A sufferer could not be given relief unless death threatened. A bone could not be set, nor a sprain bandaged. The true purpose of the Sabbath was made void by these Jewish religious leaders, for they made the people slaves to tradition, instead of having the Sabbath serve men to the honor of God. (Mt 15:3, 6; 23:2-4; Mr 2:27) When Jesus’ disciples picked grain and rubbed it in their hands to eat, they evidently were accused on two counts, namely, harvesting and threshing on the Sabbath. (Lu 6:1, 2) The rabbis had a saying: “The sins of everyone who strictly observes every law of the Sabbath, though he be an idol worshiper, are forgiven.”
From https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1200003778
Would Jesus really be violating the Mosaic Sabbath Law if he broke any of these "sabbatical" demands of the rabbis that were just a particular way of interpreting that specific law? ... or rather Jesus would only be "violating" a human addition to the law?
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2696
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:24 pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 485 times
Re: The Jesus to whom atheists and others often refer
Post #22[Replying to Eloi in post #21
The excuse is often made that Jesus was merely rejecting human additions to the law, but when he prohibits something which the law allows, like oath-taking and divorce, when the law specifically forbids additions, (Deut. 4:2, 12:32), that's violating the law, not just someone's take on the law. And when he tells others that they should keep the law at the same time he's telling them to disregard it----as in Matthew 5----it's clear that whoever he may be, someone who handles the law of Moses in such a way cannot logically be the Jewish Messiah.Would Jesus really be violating the Mosaic Sabbath Law if he broke any of these "sabbatical" demands of the rabbis that were just a particular way of interpreting that specific law? ... or rather Jesus would only be "violating" a human addition to the law?
-
- Banned
- Posts: 1775
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:31 pm
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 213 times
- Contact:
Re: The Jesus to whom atheists and others often refer
Post #23Did Jesus "prohibits something which the law allows"? Or, did Jesus make any "addition" to the Law?
Was there any post-Jesus "Mosaic Law" that included any of those supposed changes, additions, contradictions, denials, exemptions, etc. that Jesus supposedly made?
Was there any post-Jesus "Mosaic Law" that included any of those supposed changes, additions, contradictions, denials, exemptions, etc. that Jesus supposedly made?
- POI
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3525
- Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2021 5:22 pm
- Has thanked: 1619 times
- Been thanked: 1083 times
Re: The Jesus to whom atheists and others often refer
Post #24Let's start with "Luke":
Okay?
I think it depends on the day you are reading it, and which 'Book" you are reading?
In case anyone is wondering... The avatar quote states the following:
"I asked God for a bike, but I know God doesn't work that way. So I stole a bike and asked for forgiveness."
"I asked God for a bike, but I know God doesn't work that way. So I stole a bike and asked for forgiveness."
- Difflugia
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3046
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 10:25 am
- Location: Michigan
- Has thanked: 3277 times
- Been thanked: 2023 times
Re: The Jesus to whom atheists and others often refer
Post #25"I think you're overestimating how critically people are going to read these documents."
My pronouns are he, him, and his.
- POI
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3525
- Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2021 5:22 pm
- Has thanked: 1619 times
- Been thanked: 1083 times
Re: The Jesus to whom atheists and others often refer
Post #26Well, I like to give the believers every benefit of the doubt
In case anyone is wondering... The avatar quote states the following:
"I asked God for a bike, but I know God doesn't work that way. So I stole a bike and asked for forgiveness."
"I asked God for a bike, but I know God doesn't work that way. So I stole a bike and asked for forgiveness."
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2696
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:24 pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 485 times
Re: The Jesus to whom atheists and others often refer
Post #27 [Replying to Eloi in post #23
Both. He added prohibitions to the law.Did Jesus "prohibits something which the law allows"? Or, did Jesus make any "addition" to the Law?
There was in the minds of Christians: the Christian gospels.Was there any post-Jesus "Mosaic Law" that included any of those supposed changes, additions, contradictions, denials, exemptions, etc. that Jesus supposedly made?
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2572 times
Re: The Jesus to whom atheists and others often refer
Post #28A day ya ain't allowed to do no work?
No wonder Jesus quit construction and went to preaching.
No wonder Jesus quit construction and went to preaching.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6002
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6627 times
- Been thanked: 3222 times
Re: The Jesus to whom atheists and others often refer
Post #29I'm thinking that preaching is the oldest* profession in the world. What a gig. Wave your arms around, send a few incantations into the air, and pass the bucket to collect your income.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 8:34 pm A day ya ain't allowed to do no work?
No wonder Jesus quit construction and went to preaching.
* That other one is a close second I reckon.
George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
-
- Savant
- Posts: 8193
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:05 am
- Has thanked: 958 times
- Been thanked: 3550 times
Re: The Jesus to whom atheists and others often refer
Post #30Yes. This is a talking point. But the problem with the gospels is that we never get any discussion. The message is that the Rabbis are confounded when Jesus breaks (arguably) the Sabbath on his own authority. The argument of David and the Shewbread is not that the Sabbath was being broken in minor ways that didn't really matter but (because of the example of David - which is a nonsense -argument) that it is ok to break it (of it is being broken) because David ate Holy Shewbread.Eloi wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 1:14 pm There is an interesting information about the Sabbath Day in our Biblical Encyclopedia.
Rabbinic Sabbath Restrictions.
The Sabbath was originally intended to be a joyous, spiritually upbuilding time. But in their zeal to distinguish themselves from the Gentiles as much as possible, the Jewish religious leaders, especially after the return from Babylonian exile, gradually made it a burdensome thing by greatly increasing the Sabbath restrictions to 39, with innumerable lesser restrictions. These, when compiled, filled two large volumes. For example, catching a flea was forbidden as hunting. A sufferer could not be given relief unless death threatened. A bone could not be set, nor a sprain bandaged. The true purpose of the Sabbath was made void by these Jewish religious leaders, for they made the people slaves to tradition, instead of having the Sabbath serve men to the honor of God. (Mt 15:3, 6; 23:2-4; Mr 2:27) When Jesus’ disciples picked grain and rubbed it in their hands to eat, they evidently were accused on two counts, namely, harvesting and threshing on the Sabbath. (Lu 6:1, 2) The rabbis had a saying: “The sins of everyone who strictly observes every law of the Sabbath, though he be an idol worshiper, are forgiven.”
From https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1200003778
Would Jesus really be violating the Mosaic Sabbath Law if he broke any of these "sabbatical" demands of the rabbis that were just a particular way of interpreting that specific law? ... or rather Jesus would only be "violating" a human addition to the law?
Not only is this a silly argument that no Rabbi would accept, but there is never any discussion about it. The whole set up scene is of Jesus rather than being in the synagogue on the Saturday or at some house with his disciples ready to celebrate this Holy day, they are all strolling through a grainfield husking corn in full view of the Rabbis who have nothing better to do than shadow Jesus looking for some peccadillo to pounce on. Isn't clear that this is a set up apologetic by Christian writers wishing to show Jesus sidelining the Sabbath (as he does other Jewish rites) and by using a silly argument that would have not lasted five minutes against any rabbi who knew his job.