My understanding only 144,000 JWs go to heaven in total over the sum of human history.
https://www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/q ... to-heaven/
Is that correct?
There are 9 million JWs worldwide (rounded up).
https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesse ... w-many-jw/
Will the vast majority of them not go to heaven and be annihilated? What happens to the JWs that don't make the 144, 000?
The 144,000 in JW theology
Moderator: Moderators
- Wootah
- Savant
- Posts: 9196
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:16 am
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 108 times
The 144,000 in JW theology
Post #1Proverbs 18:17 The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him.
Member Notes: viewtopic.php?t=33826
"Why is everyone so quick to reason God might be petty. Now that is creating God in our own image ."
Member Notes: viewtopic.php?t=33826
"Why is everyone so quick to reason God might be petty. Now that is creating God in our own image ."
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8495
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2147 times
- Been thanked: 2295 times
Re: The 144,000 in JW theology
Post #461I stated that the Bible was written by humans. Are you suggesting that it wasn't?Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:29 amWhen you say "it is that way" I take it you can offer proof that the text has not been supernaturally originated?Tcg wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:24 amIt doesn't seem that way, it is that way. You are of course ignoring the initial written by humans detail. If you rely on the Bible, you reference is indeed humans.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:10 amIt would seem that way but for the fact that the evidence shows that despite such copying the text has not changed, if we have evidence of centuries and centuries of text being copied and not being changed or edited (there are very very minor variants of course) that seems - to me - to all but eliminate the human element.Tcg wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:00 amSounds great until one realizes that the Bible was written by, copied by, and translated by humans. If you rely on the Bible your reference is indeed humans.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 8:49 am I do not need human created organizations and their imposed rules and regulations and belief. I do speak with people and I listen to their views and I sometimes ask their opinions but I do not rely on others to define what is right and wrong, what is legal and illegal, I must and do face those decisions myself and the Bible is my reference not humans.
Tcg
Tcg
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
Re: The 144,000 in JW theology
Post #462I'm suggesting it is not the result of human minds, yes humans may have penned it or it may have been written from some oral source but I am suggesting it is not of human origin.Tcg wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:31 amI stated that the Bible was written by humans. Are you suggesting that it wasn't?Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:29 amWhen you say "it is that way" I take it you can offer proof that the text has not been supernaturally originated?Tcg wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:24 amIt doesn't seem that way, it is that way. You are of course ignoring the initial written by humans detail. If you rely on the Bible, you reference is indeed humans.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:10 amIt would seem that way but for the fact that the evidence shows that despite such copying the text has not changed, if we have evidence of centuries and centuries of text being copied and not being changed or edited (there are very very minor variants of course) that seems - to me - to all but eliminate the human element.Tcg wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:00 amSounds great until one realizes that the Bible was written by, copied by, and translated by humans. If you rely on the Bible your reference is indeed humans.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 8:49 am I do not need human created organizations and their imposed rules and regulations and belief. I do speak with people and I listen to their views and I sometimes ask their opinions but I do not rely on others to define what is right and wrong, what is legal and illegal, I must and do face those decisions myself and the Bible is my reference not humans.
Tcg
Tcg
Tcg
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8495
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2147 times
- Been thanked: 2295 times
Re: The 144,000 in JW theology
Post #463And yet you've not provided any aspect of the production of the Bible that isn't the result of human activity.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:40 amI'm suggesting it is not the result of human minds, yes humans may have penned it or it may have been written from some oral source but I am suggesting it is not of human origin.Tcg wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:31 amI stated that the Bible was written by humans. Are you suggesting that it wasn't?Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:29 amWhen you say "it is that way" I take it you can offer proof that the text has not been supernaturally originated?Tcg wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:24 amIt doesn't seem that way, it is that way. You are of course ignoring the initial written by humans detail. If you rely on the Bible, you reference is indeed humans.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:10 amIt would seem that way but for the fact that the evidence shows that despite such copying the text has not changed, if we have evidence of centuries and centuries of text being copied and not being changed or edited (there are very very minor variants of course) that seems - to me - to all but eliminate the human element.Tcg wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:00 amSounds great until one realizes that the Bible was written by, copied by, and translated by humans. If you rely on the Bible your reference is indeed humans.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 8:49 am I do not need human created organizations and their imposed rules and regulations and belief. I do speak with people and I listen to their views and I sometimes ask their opinions but I do not rely on others to define what is right and wrong, what is legal and illegal, I must and do face those decisions myself and the Bible is my reference not humans.
Tcg
Tcg
Tcg
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
-
- Under Probation
- Posts: 4194
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 10:51 am
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 459 times
Re: The 144,000 in JW theology
Post #464There are already threads on that subject.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 8:52 amCan we discuss blood transfusions then? how is that not doctrinal baggage? were you opposed to that before joining this organization?2timothy316 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 06, 2022 4:07 pmThat is not how it happened for me. So this statement is not true. Doctrinal baggage was lifted off of me. Jesus' load is light. (Matt 11:28-30). The death of the wicked doesn't burden me at all. Yet it seems from how you're reacting to scripture the Bible seems to burden you.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Thu Jan 06, 2022 3:51 pm
Members of organized groups like this (and there are a great many) have likely already embraced the "statement of beliefs" and other doctrinal baggage (else they'd not have decided to become members).
You sure like trying to guess how and why everyone is where they are. As Witnesses we are strongly encouraged not to judge a person before speaking with them. Are we perfect at it? No but as I said before, there are no perfect people.
1 Samuel 16:7 says, "mere man sees what appears to the eyes."
This is why as Witnesses we are taught to try and discern the heart, using God's Word the Bible. (Heb. 4:12)
viewtopic.php?f=38&t=38267&p=1037833&hi ... s#p1037833
You see it as baggage, I do not. Jesus' blood saves my life not yours or anyone else's.
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 21136
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 794 times
- Been thanked: 1123 times
- Contact:
Re: The 144,000 in JW theology
Post #465And if you find information in the bible does not agree with your personal preference, what do you do? I ask because, if you reference the bible you must know that the Apostles and first century Christians most certainly made up what would be decribed today as an organised religion. And Jesus indicated this was exactly what he intended for them.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 8:49 am .. I must and do face those decisions myself and the Bible is my reference not humans.
JEHOVAH'S WITNESS
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 21136
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 794 times
- Been thanked: 1123 times
- Contact:
Re: The 144,000 in JW theology
Post #466Emphasis MINE
You are most welcome to start another thread or find one that with that as the discussion topic and do so.
This OP is focussing on the 144, 000.
JW
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
Re: The 144,000 in JW theology
Post #467How do you think we'd establish that? assume it were true, then what would you seek as evidence that it was not of human origin? what hallmarks might it have?Tcg wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:44 amAnd yet you've not provided any aspect of the production of the Bible that isn't the result of human activity.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:40 amI'm suggesting it is not the result of human minds, yes humans may have penned it or it may have been written from some oral source but I am suggesting it is not of human origin.Tcg wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:31 amI stated that the Bible was written by humans. Are you suggesting that it wasn't?Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:29 amWhen you say "it is that way" I take it you can offer proof that the text has not been supernaturally originated?Tcg wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:24 amIt doesn't seem that way, it is that way. You are of course ignoring the initial written by humans detail. If you rely on the Bible, you reference is indeed humans.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:10 amIt would seem that way but for the fact that the evidence shows that despite such copying the text has not changed, if we have evidence of centuries and centuries of text being copied and not being changed or edited (there are very very minor variants of course) that seems - to me - to all but eliminate the human element.Tcg wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:00 amSounds great until one realizes that the Bible was written by, copied by, and translated by humans. If you rely on the Bible your reference is indeed humans.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 8:49 am I do not need human created organizations and their imposed rules and regulations and belief. I do speak with people and I listen to their views and I sometimes ask their opinions but I do not rely on others to define what is right and wrong, what is legal and illegal, I must and do face those decisions myself and the Bible is my reference not humans.
Tcg
Tcg
Tcg
Tcg
-
- Under Probation
- Posts: 4194
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 10:51 am
- Has thanked: 177 times
- Been thanked: 459 times
Re: The 144,000 in JW theology
Post #468Yet that is not what I see you doing. I see a bunch of judging based on your dogma and wanting others to trust you on what is right and wrong.Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 8:49 am I do speak with people and I listen to their views and I sometimes ask their opinions but I do not rely on others to define what is right and wrong, what is legal and illegal, I must and do face those decisions myself and the Bible is my reference not humans.
Most JWs want to live on Earth forever on a paradise. Yet you say this is wrong even though the Bible says that the earth will endure forever with righteous people on it. The Bible gives a limited number of those that will be Jesus as rulers in Heaven. But you define that as wrong too. While you say you don't rely on others for what is right and wrong you sure do want others to depend on you.
For what I read in your replies to me and others, your dogma takes center stage. Which is in reality just an opinion.
Re: The 144,000 in JW theology
Post #469I pray, I seek, I examine my own motives, my own thinking, try to remove my personal desires from the question.JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:07 amAnd if you find information in the bible does not agree with your personal preference, what do you do?Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 8:49 am .. I must and do face those decisions myself and the Bible is my reference not humans.
Perhaps, there's perhaps some truth to that, early church history is a fascinating subject but the Apostles did know Christ personally, they were true witnesses, the Apostolic fathers knew the Apostles, but as time went on the connection naturally grew more and more tenuous and the Catholic church emerged very early on.JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:07 am I ask because, if you reference the bible you must know that the Apostles and first century Christians most certainly made up what would be described today as an organized religion. And Jesus indicated this was exactly what he intended for them.
Further, the Apostles were directly or indirectly the first (human) source of the written Gospels and Epistles.
Christ rebuked organized structures that burdened people with a "yoke" and today's "sects" pretty much do the same thing, even if the earliest "church" could be described as an "organization" I doubt it bore any resemblance to today's busy body ridden organizations.
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 21136
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 794 times
- Been thanked: 1123 times
- Contact:
Re: The 144,000 in JW theology
Post #470Sherlock Holmes wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:50 amJehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:07 amPerhaps, there's perhaps some truth to that, ... but the Apostles did know Christ personally, they were true witnesses, the Apostolic fathers knew the Apostles, but as time went on the connection naturally grew more and more tenuous and the Catholic church emerged very early on.JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:07 am I ask because, if you reference the bible you must know that the Apostles and first century Christians most certainly made up what would be described today as an organized religion. And Jesus indicated this was exactly what he intended for them.
So you recognized that an organised structured church was the Apostolic model and that these {to quote you" } "Apostles did know Christ personally, [and] were true witnesses"? From this can we not surmise that Christ' s wish as communicate to his Apostles is that his followers belong to an organised religion that follows the original early pattern?
Last edited by JehovahsWitness on Fri Jan 07, 2022 11:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8