I was watching a vid yesterday - this one;Because person should be guilty only for his own actions.
and the Rabbi was saying the same thing in relation to how the Messiah isn't someone who dies for the sins of others...
Moderator: Moderators
I was watching a vid yesterday - this one;Because person should be guilty only for his own actions.
Indeed, but who can claim to have the monopoly on identifying who is guilty of doing the above ? You? I think not given your admission.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 1:25 pm
I'm just pointing out an example of how a metaphor that seems so straightforward can be misconstrued.
You have your opinion, I have mine. We both no doubt see straightforward and I see misconstrued convolution, the only difference is we see it coming from a different directions.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 1:24 pm
When we metaphor, we allow a potential multitude of interpretations...
I am not saying that at all. Please see:William wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 4:09 pmAre you therefore saying that if the idea that a creative mind is involved with why this experiential reality and we within it, happens to exist, that as long as that mind behind its existence is not the biblical idea of said Creator, that you can accept that there is no evil intent of the part of said mind, involved in creating this reality?Compassionist wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 3:08 pmThe Bible claims in Genesis that God made the world and all the living things within. What is more, God even makes evil: "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things." - Isaiah 45:7, The Bible (KJV). That's why if the Bible is true, the Biblical God is omniculpable and evil. If the allegedly omniscient and omnipotent Biblical God had made all created beings equally omnibenevolent, omniscient and omnipotent then the Devil would not even have wanted to harm Adam and Eve and Adam. If Adam and Eve were all-knowing and all-powerful to begin with they would not have eaten from the Tree of Knowledge. If the Bible is true, then it is all God's fault and God should be punished accordingly by God.William wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 2:21 pm [Replying to Compassionist in post #1]
I think the overall problem isn't about the God of the bible, but about the idea of this experiential reality being mindfully created [inferring a creator of some kind] and that is why 'the problem of evil' was invented.I am convinced that it is morally wrong of the Biblical God to harden the Pharaoh's heart and then punish him for it. I disagree with the stance of the Got Questions Team about this. We are not clay pots. We are sentient beings. All sentient biological beings feel pain and that gives us rights. If God is causing us pain and death then God is culpable. Am I the only one or are there others who feel the same way?
It appears that there is no problem of evil with being part of this experiential reality as long as one believes it is a purely mindless purposeless accident of a thing, but as soon as a creative mind is implied as the cause of it existing, 'the problem of evil' becomes an issue and a reason for why folk shy away from or vigorously oppose the notion of, which I find interesting.
As an argument, I find the "problem of evil" to being on par with the "problem of unicorns".
Things I want to do but can't do due to lack of ability:1213 wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 12:30 pmBecause person should be guilty only for his own actions. God has given us life and freedom, if we use it for evil, we are guilty for that evil, not God, especially when God has given good rules how to live correctly.Compassionist wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 3:02 pmWhat is the basis of your disagreeing, please?1213 wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 1:48 pmSorry, I disagree with that.Compassionist wrote: ↑Sun May 22, 2022 5:02 pm ...One can't be all-knowing and all-powerful without being guilty of everything that is wrong with all that exists. ...
But, what do you think, should gun manufacturers be held guilty for all murder committed by their guns?
Of course, the Christians will simply say the Jews were inadequate in their view of the messiah. If you take the Christian dogma of the Messiah, then the Jewish assessment simply is irrelevant. And of course they can "Prove" their view of the messiah in fiddling OT text to fit their view and claim that the OT confirms their view.William wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 1:39 pm [Replying to 1213 in post #49]
I was watching a vid yesterday - this one;Because person should be guilty only for his own actions.
and the Rabbi was saying the same thing in relation to how the Messiah isn't someone who dies for the sins of others...
Plenty fairJehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 1:44 pmIndeed, but who can claim to have the monopoly on identifying who is guilty of doing the above ? You? I think not given your admission.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 1:25 pm
I'm just pointing out an example of how a metaphor that seems so straightforward can be misconstrued.
You have your opinion, I have mine. We both no doubt see straightforward and I see misconstrued convolution, the only difference is we see it coming from a different directions.JoeyKnothead wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 1:24 pm
When we metaphor, we allow a potential multitude of interpretations...
My concern here is folks who'd act on their interpretation of biblical metaphors (or other claims) in a way that restricts the rights and freedoms of others. Up to and including overt acts of bigotry and violence.No biggie,
I disagree with victim mentality as it bases its station of position on assumptions which themselves are insufficient evidence to warrant being the victim of circumstance.I am clearly not a free agent with a free will. I am truly a prisoner of causality who does things he does not want to do and can't do what he wants to do. The same applies to you and other prisoners of causality. All sentient biological beings are victims from conception to death. We live inevitable lives and make inevitable choices. All our choices are determined by our genes, environments, nutrients and experiences. Only an all-knowing and all-powerful being has free will. All else are victims of having insufficient knowledge and having insufficient power.
Tardigrades https://www.nationalgeographic.com/anim ... ater-bears can live without air, water and food. You can demonstrate that you are not a victim of determinism by doing what tardigrades do. Please document your years without oxygen, water and food by doing a livestream of it online. If you can do it, it will convince me that you are not a prisoner of causality. Also, please make all living things (past, present and future) forever happy with your alleged free will and grant all living things omnibenevolence, omniscience, omnipotence and an infinite number of universes each. I bet you will fail to do these tasks. It's not your fault. Your every choice is determined and constrained and empowered by your unique mix of genes, environments, nutrients and experiences. As is mine.William wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 3:39 pm [Replying to Compassionist in post #54]
I disagree with victim mentality as it bases its station of position on assumptions which themselves are insufficient evidence to warrant being the victim of circumstance.I am clearly not a free agent with a free will. I am truly a prisoner of causality who does things he does not want to do and can't do what he wants to do. The same applies to you and other prisoners of causality. All sentient biological beings are victims from conception to death. We live inevitable lives and make inevitable choices. All our choices are determined by our genes, environments, nutrients and experiences. Only an all-knowing and all-powerful being has free will. All else are victims of having insufficient knowledge and having insufficient power.
I suspect that in some, if not many cases where the supposed 'problem of evil' is forefront in the reasoning preventing individuals from entertaining the idea that there is a creative mind involved with this experiential reality, because being the victim is preferrable.
Fortunately I can empathize, as I am sure most folk can, as most folk have felt like victims of circumstance and I certainly have wished for a 'perfect world' or at least a better world than the one we currently occupy - but ultimately I saw no usefulness in retaining the victim role as it showed itself to be detrimental - not only to my mental health - but also to my finding any possibly meaning for being, amongst it all as it is rather than as I personally wished it could be, or thought it should be.