Who was the author of Matthew?
Moderator: Moderators
Who was the author of Matthew?
Post #1Who was the author of Matthew? There is almost no information on him.
jd
Author of Salt & Light; The Complete Jesus www.saltandlight.ca
Author of Salt & Light; The Complete Jesus www.saltandlight.ca
Re: Who was the author of Matthew?
Post #21Of course they are based on facts. True, we don't know who Matthew was, but we have testimony passed on by eye-witnesses about the author of Mark and how it the Gospel was written. John self identifies himself in the Gospel. Also John does not use Mark as a source; he reports his own story of being with Jesus. It's true you can never be 100% sure of anything; if you choose that criterium then you really can get nowhere in this case, but there are ways of knowing for pretty sure. And this is the case of the authors of the gospels.neverknewyou wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 3:50 pm [Replying to jd01 in post #15]
Those are well known traditional views that have no basis in fact. None of the gospel writers are known. Everything that is known about a living Jesus comes from Mark and not a single word of Marks gospel can be verified, and all of the subsequent gospel writers, canonical and non-canonical, are all reliant on Mark therefore they otherwise knew nothing about a living Jesus.
jd
Author of Salt & Light; The Complete Jesus www.saltandlight.ca
Author of Salt & Light; The Complete Jesus www.saltandlight.ca
- Diagoras
- Guru
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2019 12:47 am
- Has thanked: 170 times
- Been thanked: 579 times
Re: Who was the author of Matthew?
Post #22That’s 2 Corinthians 12, correct?neverknewyou wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:03 am In those days preachers had to impress their congregations by demonstrating their divine connection, it was their divine connection that granted them (apostles) authority, that's why Paul brags about going to the third heaven to get special information and his visions demonstrated his direct communication with Christ
It seems that claiming to have have ‘divine connections’ through visions would have been a reasonably safe way to gain influence. After all, it’s unprovable.
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:27 pm
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 32 times
Re: Who was the author of Matthew?
Post #23Exactly, the best kind.Diagoras wrote: ↑Tue Aug 09, 2022 8:00 pmThat’s 2 Corinthians 12, correct?neverknewyou wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 4:03 am In those days preachers had to impress their congregations by demonstrating their divine connection, it was their divine connection that granted them (apostles) authority, that's why Paul brags about going to the third heaven to get special information and his visions demonstrated his direct communication with Christ
It seems that claiming to have have ‘divine connections’ through visions would have been a reasonably safe way to gain influence. After all, it’s unprovable.
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8495
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2147 times
- Been thanked: 2295 times
Re: Who was the author of Matthew?
Post #24They only Johns I can find in mentioned in gospel John are John the Baptist and John the father of Simon Peter. Where is the self-identification you are referring to?
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8495
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2147 times
- Been thanked: 2295 times
Re: Who was the author of Matthew?
Post #25How can you make the earlier claim given the admission of uncertainty that follows?
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:27 pm
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 32 times
Re: Who was the author of Matthew?
Post #26You won't find anything, the kicker is that gJohn writes the disciple's names out of the story, even his own. Who says the gospel authors were void of humour?
-
Online
- Savant
- Posts: 8182
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:05 am
- Has thanked: 957 times
- Been thanked: 3549 times
Re: Who was the author of Matthew?
Post #27I've always wondered why Levi (the taxman in Capernaum) became Matthew in Matthew's Gospel. It is a bit like the 'Other' disciple looking a bit like John (son of Zebedee) even though when originally they Join jesus it's Andrew and Peter names with the third disciple not named. James and John (sons of Zebedee) come as a second unit after Andrew and Peter (brothers). But it's too easy to try to tease truth -clues out of what could be scenarios made up out of thin air. John's unnamed disciple also looks rather like the remote view observer of some storytelling. Though he does get a definite action in looking in the tomb, but again more secondary confirmation of what Simon had seen. But all very arguable and easy to dismiss by the "It's all true" Bible believers.
Re: Who was the author of Matthew?
Post #28The author self-identifies himself as the Beloved Disciple. There is a universal agreement in the Early Church that a certain John wrote the Gospel. Most later assumed it was John the Disciple but Papias is careful to identify John, the Elder and internal evidence suggests he was the author. I go over the details in my book.
jd
Author of Salt & Light; The Complete Jesus www.saltandlight.ca
Author of Salt & Light; The Complete Jesus www.saltandlight.ca
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8495
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2147 times
- Been thanked: 2295 times
Re: Who was the author of Matthew?
Post #29A good argument has been made that the Beloved Disciple was Lazarus. Yes, the author identifies himself as the Beloved Disciple. He does NOT self-identify as John. To claim to know what the Early Church universally agreed on is quite a stretch. It wouldn't be possible to even know everyone who was a part of the Early Church much less what they did or did not agree on.jd01 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 10, 2022 4:25 pmThe author self-identifies himself as the Beloved Disciple. There is a universal agreement in the Early Church that a certain John wrote the Gospel. Most later assumed it was John the Disciple but Papias is careful to identify John, the Elder and internal evidence suggests he was the author. I go over the details in my book.
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- tam
- Savant
- Posts: 6443
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:59 pm
- Has thanked: 353 times
- Been thanked: 324 times
- Contact:
Re: Who was the author of Matthew?
Post #30Peace to you,
Luke is not an eyewitness though (as has been said in this thread). Nor does he ever claim to be an eyewitness. He claims to have investigated and then written an orderly report from what others who were eyewitnesses had handed down to them.
If Mark is a companion (or son... 1Peter 5:13) of Peter, then Mark probably got most of his information from Peter; though if Mark is Peter's actual son, he may have witnessed a few things himself.
Matthew is the one I am not sure about. I have that one in a "probably Levi" category.
Peace again to you!
Yes, and (as my Lord showed me) Lazarus is indeed identified in that gospel as the one He loved. This makes the author of "John" an eyewitness, even if most won't accept that. Just not the eyewitness that has been traditionally taught.Tcg wrote: ↑Wed Aug 10, 2022 7:15 pmA good argument has been made that the Beloved Disciple was Lazarus. Yes, the author identifies himself as the Beloved Disciple. He does NOT self-identify as John. To claim to know what the Early Church universally agreed on is quite a stretch. It wouldn't be possible to even know everyone who was a part of the Early Church much less what they did or did not agree on.jd01 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 10, 2022 4:25 pmThe author self-identifies himself as the Beloved Disciple. There is a universal agreement in the Early Church that a certain John wrote the Gospel. Most later assumed it was John the Disciple but Papias is careful to identify John, the Elder and internal evidence suggests he was the author. I go over the details in my book.
Tcg
Luke is not an eyewitness though (as has been said in this thread). Nor does he ever claim to be an eyewitness. He claims to have investigated and then written an orderly report from what others who were eyewitnesses had handed down to them.
If Mark is a companion (or son... 1Peter 5:13) of Peter, then Mark probably got most of his information from Peter; though if Mark is Peter's actual son, he may have witnessed a few things himself.
Matthew is the one I am not sure about. I have that one in a "probably Levi" category.
Peace again to you!
- Non-religious Christian spirituality
- For Christ (who is the Spirit)
- For Christ (who is the Spirit)