[
Replying to Brightfame52 in post #107]
I did answer it.
Your "answer" appears to be from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers.
I dont care what it appears to you, then dont ask me to explain anything.
This is a debate forum. If you are unwilling to explain anything, then go play church somewhere else, because reciting the vain conversations received by tradition from your fathers and being unable or unwilling or uncaring to explain or question the validity of those vain traditions, isn't helpful to the process of uncovering the truth. Questioning claims of the truth is a far more reasonable and honorable occupation than blind adoration.
If you someones explanation then have the decorum to read it, you either agree or you dont, but you not the standard of what Truth is.
At the very least, the standard for defining what truth is, is truthfulness itself.
Granted, it is not an easy ask, or task to discover The Truth, but it isn't done simply by accepting the vain conversations received by tradition from your fathers, be these through writings or preaching about writings.
The mythology surrounding a guilt-garden-god concept is explainable as a vain and ignorant attempt of the author[s] to make sense of their existence, as my past posts in this thread verify and remain uncontested.