It just have to be reasonable

[Eloi]

To believe in God you don't need complicated reasons, or scientific reasons, or being intellectual, or having all the answers in the world. To believe in God, only one reason is needed: to realize reality.

Heb. 3:4 Of course, every house is constructed by someone, but the one who constructed all things is God.

The beauty of the Universe and everything that exists on our planet proves that there is an Intelligent and powerful Creator.

If you found a house in the middle of the desert, would you believe that it was made by itself as a result of sandstorms over trillions of years?

The earth is like a house in the middle of a space desert. It has drinking water, electricity, light, food pantries, indirect music, air conditioning and heating... and even carpets.

Rom. 1:20 For his invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even his eternal power and Godship, so that they are inexcusable.

Is there any objective reason why this very simplistic reasoning is invalid?

[LittleNipper]

[Replying to DrNoGods in post #21]

I'll tell you this. The difference between the death penalty, a life sentence, and 20 years --- has to do with eyewitnesses. No eyewitnesses, and there isn't going to be a death penalty conviction.

[DrNoGods]

[Replying to LittleNipper in post #31]

I'll tell you this. The difference between the death penalty, a life sentence, and 20 years --- has to do with eyewitnesses. No eyewitnesses, and there isn't going to be a death penalty conviction.

What does this have to do with anything? You claimed that nothing could be considered a fact unless it was personally witnessed. I asked if you witnessed the resurrection of Jesus to confirm it was a fact, and you respond with something to do with court sentences. You did not personally witness the resurrection of Jesus, so by your own criterion that event cannot be confirmed by you or any other living human. Correct?

[otseng]

You don't even know the difference between methods and method classification. What a pity that evolutionists look for support in such clueless people.

Hahahaha, You are in the height of your delirium!

Moderator Warning



Incivility is not allowed on the forum.

Please review our Rules.



______________



Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

[The Nice Centurion]

[Replying to Eloi in post #24]

If evolutionists believe that humans are transmuted apes, they should show that at some point these apes began to feel ashamed of being naked and began to make clothing to cover themselves.

Wow ... do you really think evolution works that way? Here's a tip ... go read up on evolution of the human brain. There are many easy-to-read web articles on this ... pick one:

https://humanorigins.si.edu/human-chara ... ics/brains

https://www.yourgenome.org/stories/evol ... man-brain/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_brain

You tell him!

These apes of course not began wearing clothes first time out of shame.

Instead they got bored and bought themselves fashion magazines to do away time by reading.

And then they got convinced they wanted the newest line of clothes designed by Karl Magerheld!