How can we trust the Bible if it's not inerrant?

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20834
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 362 times
Contact:

How can we trust the Bible if it's not inerrant?

Post #1

Post by otseng »

From the On the Bible being inerrant thread:
nobspeople wrote: Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:42 amHow can you trust something that's written about god that contradictory, contains errors and just plain wrong at times? Is there a logical way to do so, or do you just want it to be god's word so much that you overlook these things like happens so often through the history of christianity?
otseng wrote: Wed Sep 22, 2021 7:08 am The Bible can still be God's word, inspired, authoritative, and trustworthy without the need to believe in inerrancy.
For debate:
How can the Bible be considered authoritative and inspired without the need to believe in the doctrine of inerrancy?

While debating, do not simply state verses to say the Bible is inspired or trustworthy.

----------

Thread Milestones

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20834
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 362 times
Contact:

Re: How can we trust the Bible if it's not inerrant?

Post #3461

Post by otseng »

William wrote: Tue Dec 19, 2023 11:26 am The GM was about the reliability of the Bible.
Randomly generated messages that you hear from the Father is not allowable evidence on this forum. Please respect the rules of the forum.

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20834
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 362 times
Contact:

Re: God hardening Pharaoh's heart

Post #3462

Post by otseng »

Athetotheist wrote: Tue Dec 19, 2023 1:17 pm
Right, they didn't believe Noah's message. But it doesn't mean they were not warned.
Their babies weren't warned----and weren't guilty of anything.

There's no getting around that.
There's also no getting around the parents were warned and they were responsible for not heeding the warning. There's also no getting around you having no justification for making any moral judgments on God.

And what do you suggest on how the babies could've lived through the flood? If God did not supernaturally save Noah, how could the babies have been saved?

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20834
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 362 times
Contact:

Re: God hardening Pharaoh's heart

Post #3463

Post by otseng »

Athetotheist wrote: Tue Dec 19, 2023 6:07 pmParents of children who were babies when such a flood struck wouldn't have time to warn them before the flood struck.

There's no way around that.
Let's say they were just born when the warning was given. They would've been 120 years old when the flood came. They would've had plenty of time to warn their children. Even if they had a child at 80 years old, their child would be 40 years old when the flood came.

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20834
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 362 times
Contact:

Re: Genocide and child sacrifices

Post #3464

Post by otseng »

boatsnguitars wrote: Tue Dec 19, 2023 7:15 pm [Replying to otseng in post #3451]
The point is that other people did those things, but to racists, it was only a sin worthy of death when z certain group did it.
That's the point.
They didn't kill the group because if their group, they killed them because of the sins they attributed to the group.
That's the point you tried to twist for the Biblical example, yet, Nazis and and Jews is an apt comparison.
Who's the one trying to twist things? I've already presented evidence the Nazis discriminated based on race, not on any crimes or immoral actions of the Jews. You can claim anything they want, but without evidence, there is no support for it.
Further, I have to question the morals of a religion that requires people to defend genocide.
First you have to prove it was a genocide that was based on race. As I've argued, it's not genocide, but a judgment based on sin. It doesn't even make sense that God would commit genocide against the Israelites.

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20834
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 362 times
Contact:

Re: Genocide and child sacrifices

Post #3465

Post by otseng »

AgnosticBoy wrote: Wed Dec 20, 2023 3:31 am I don't have a problem with genocide just as long as it is justified, as in, everyone killed was actually guilty of a capital offense. What I find to be damning in the Bible is when babies or the innocent are included in genocidal acts. If that happened during the Global Flood (Genesis 6) then I find that to be inexcusable. I'm open to logic and verifiable evidence to the contrary, but what I've found from those who would justify that gets down to personal or selective standards/morals, at some point. That's one of the reasons I stop being a believer, although I still think the Bible has some good and helpful things to say on other matters.
Yes, the morality of the Old Testament is an issue for believers, that is why I do want to spent time on this topic.

As for babies, I think it's a categorical error to say babies are "innocent". This implies some sort of moral judgment that they can make. Yes, I can see the tragedy of killing babies in the flood, but as I've asked, what option is there for God to save the babies?

User avatar
boatsnguitars
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2060
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2023 10:09 am
Has thanked: 477 times
Been thanked: 582 times

Re: Genocide and child sacrifices

Post #3466

Post by boatsnguitars »

otseng wrote: Wed Dec 20, 2023 8:26 am
boatsnguitars wrote: Tue Dec 19, 2023 7:15 pm [Replying to otseng in post #3451]
The point is that other people did those things, but to racists, it was only a sin worthy of death when z certain group did it.
That's the point.
They didn't kill the group because if their group, they killed them because of the sins they attributed to the group.
That's the point you tried to twist for the Biblical example, yet, Nazis and and Jews is an apt comparison.
Who's the one trying to twist things? I've already presented evidence the Nazis discriminated based on race, not on any crimes or immoral actions of the Jews. You can claim anything they want, but without evidence, there is no support for it.
Further, I have to question the morals of a religion that requires people to defend genocide.
First you have to prove it was a genocide that was based on race. As I've argued, it's not genocide, but a judgment based on sin. It doesn't even make sense that God would commit genocide against the Israelites.
Nazis killed the Jews because they believed Jews caused disease, and did sinful things according to their beliefs. It's like racists saying, "We don't target black people because of their skin color, we target them because they do more crime than other people... That's why racial profiling is acceptable." (They don't realize that racial profiling is the reason more Black people get arrested - after all, they don't do crime at a higher rate than whites, or, if they do in some areas, it's because they are economically disadvantaged - because of their skin color).

You are simply doing the same thing. Just own it, but don't pretend you are somehow taking the high road that because it wasn't genocide it's all good.
“And do you think that unto such as you
A maggot-minded, starved, fanatic crew
God gave a secret, and denied it me?
Well, well—what matters it? Believe that, too!”
― Omar Khayyâm

Athetotheist
Prodigy
Posts: 3346
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:24 pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 597 times

Re: God hardening Pharaoh's heart

Post #3467

Post by Athetotheist »

[Replying to otseng in post #3462
There's also no getting around the parents were warned and they were responsible for not heeding the warning.
The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
(Ezekiel 18:19-23)

There's also no getting around you having no justification for making any moral judgments on God.
By "God" you mean Jehovah. If I were passing judgement here on Molech, Tezcatlipoca or Zeus, you'd be doing so along with me, wouldn't you?

Let's say they were just born when the warning was given. They would've been 120 years old when the flood came. They would've had plenty of time to warn their children. Even if they had a child at 80 years old, their child would be 40 years old when the flood came.
No, let's not conveniently say they were born when the warning was given. Let's say they were born when the rain started falling.

User avatar
AgnosticBoy
Guru
Posts: 1653
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:44 pm
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 168 times
Contact:

Re: Genocide and child sacrifices

Post #3468

Post by AgnosticBoy »

otseng wrote: Wed Dec 20, 2023 8:36 am
AgnosticBoy wrote: Wed Dec 20, 2023 3:31 am I don't have a problem with genocide just as long as it is justified, as in, everyone killed was actually guilty of a capital offense. What I find to be damning in the Bible is when babies or the innocent are included in genocidal acts. If that happened during the Global Flood (Genesis 6) then I find that to be inexcusable. I'm open to logic and verifiable evidence to the contrary, but what I've found from those who would justify that gets down to personal or selective standards/morals, at some point. That's one of the reasons I stop being a believer, although I still think the Bible has some good and helpful things to say on other matters.
Yes, the morality of the Old Testament is an issue for believers, that is why I do want to spent time on this topic.

As for babies, I think it's a categorical error to say babies are "innocent". This implies some sort of moral judgment that they can make. Yes, I can see the tragedy of killing babies in the flood, but as I've asked, what option is there for God to save the babies?
I'm willing to accept your point about babies not being morally culpable. But then, as even you bring up, they still went through the same punishment that the guilty people went through. You asked about God's options for the babies, but I would also think that an omnipotent/omniscient God would've been able to keep the innocent and those without moral culpability from being killed. God supposedly was able to do that for Noah and his family. Your response doesn't cover that point at all.

I did get an interesting response from a Christian friend that told me that in a fallen world no one is innocent, not even babies. But even that explanation is problematic in that it would only apply to points involving natural evil, like why we all die and suffer, but it would not apply in cases involving justice, where someone's suffering or is punishment is imposed on them by a society or as part of a justice system. For instance, just because we're in a fallen world doesn't mean that everyone gets the punishment for adultery since not everyone commits that act.
- Proud forum owner ∣ The Agnostic Forum

- As a non-partisan, I like to be on the side of truth. - AB

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20834
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 362 times
Contact:

Re: Genocide and child sacrifices

Post #3469

Post by otseng »

boatsnguitars wrote: Wed Dec 20, 2023 10:20 am Nazis killed the Jews because they believed Jews caused disease, and did sinful things according to their beliefs. It's like racists saying, "We don't target black people because of their skin color, we target them because they do more crime than other people... That's why racial profiling is acceptable." (They don't realize that racial profiling is the reason more Black people get arrested - after all, they don't do crime at a higher rate than whites, or, if they do in some areas, it's because they are economically disadvantaged - because of their skin color).

You are simply doing the same thing. Just own it, but don't pretend you are somehow taking the high road that because it wasn't genocide it's all good.
No, I'm not doing the same thing. I've provided 3 sources pointing out the discrimination is based on race (and I can provide more if necessary). Whereas you have not cited any sources to back up your claims.

User avatar
boatsnguitars
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2060
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2023 10:09 am
Has thanked: 477 times
Been thanked: 582 times

Re: Genocide and child sacrifices

Post #3470

Post by boatsnguitars »

otseng wrote: Thu Dec 21, 2023 5:33 am
boatsnguitars wrote: Wed Dec 20, 2023 10:20 am Nazis killed the Jews because they believed Jews caused disease, and did sinful things according to their beliefs. It's like racists saying, "We don't target black people because of their skin color, we target them because they do more crime than other people... That's why racial profiling is acceptable." (They don't realize that racial profiling is the reason more Black people get arrested - after all, they don't do crime at a higher rate than whites, or, if they do in some areas, it's because they are economically disadvantaged - because of their skin color).

You are simply doing the same thing. Just own it, but don't pretend you are somehow taking the high road that because it wasn't genocide it's all good.
No, I'm not doing the same thing. I've provided 3 sources pointing out the discrimination is based on race (and I can provide more if necessary). Whereas you have not cited any sources to back up your claims.
I've provided an argument. Citations aren't magical. They don't automatically win debates. However:
If the President of the United States were to announce that God had toldhim to use the vast military power at his disposal to obliterate, say, the na-tion of Iran, “saving alive nothing that breathes,” people would assume thathe was mad and he would speedily be dismissed from office. No one—well,almost no one—would take seriously the idea that God had instructed himto do this terrible thing. Why not? Because, apart from the obvious fact that such an attack would be contrary to our national self-interest, a genocidal attack on another nation is a moral outrage, and God is generally assumed to be perfectly good in a sense that is incompatible with commanding moral outrages. Why then, should we not react to the Deuteronomy passages quoted above in a similar way? No doubt the author(s) of Deuteronomy believed that God had commanded a genocidal attack on the inhabitants of the Promised Land.
https://spot.colorado.edu/~morristo/Did ... nocide.pdf
Many Christians believe that the Hebrew Bible – the collection of writings they refer to as the Old Testament (OT) – contains a faithful record of God’s dealings with his chosen people. Yet there aredisturbing OT texts1in which the God of Israel (Yahweh2) is represented as mandating genocide3,commanding the Israelites to lay waste to whole cities, killing men, women, children, and even animals.Given the nature of these stories, one might have thought it obvious – just on moral grounds – that theBible contains grave errors. But some well known and highly respected Christian philosophers are reluctantto draw that conclusion. Richard Swinburne speaks for many when he says that, as the Giver of life, Godhas a right to take it, and also the right to assign the task of taking life to others. Applying this doctrine tobiblical texts, Swinburne writes: “God therefore has the right to order the Israelites to kill the Canaanites”(2011: 224).4Even if this is correct, it is not by itself (as I am sure Swinburne would agree) sufficient to dispose ofthe problem posed by the genocide texts. A perfectly good and wise God would not exercise a “right” to command genocide unless he had very good reasons for doing so. The crucial question, then, is whether itis at all plausible to suppose that God had reasons compatible with his goodness and wisdom for commanding the annihilation of various ancient peoples.5As we shall see, the genocide texts themselves give reasons for these divine commands.
https://spot.colorado.edu/~morristo/div ... nocide.pdf

For example, in Deuteronomy 20:16-18 God orders the Israelites to "not leave alive anything that breathes… completely destroy them …",[27][28] thus leading many scholars to characterize these as commands to commit genocide.[29][30]

The Book of Revelation is full of imagery of war, genocide, and destruction.

Genocide
Scholar Nur Masalha writes that the "genocide" of the extermination commandments has been "kept before subsequent generations" and he also writes that those commandments have also served as inspirational examples of divine support for the slaughtering of enemies.[180] Scholar Leonard B. Glick states that Jewish fundamentalists in Israel, such as Shlomo Aviner, consider the Palestinians to be like biblical Canaanites, and that some fundamentalist leaders suggest that they "must be prepared to destroy" the Palestinians if the Palestinians do not leave the land.[181]

Arthur Grenke quotes historian, author and scholar David Stannard: "Discussing the influence of Christian beliefs on the destruction of the Native peoples in the Americas, Stannard argues that while the New Testament's view of war is ambiguous, there is little ambiguity in the Old Testament. He points to sections in Deuteronomy in which the Israelite God, Yahweh, commanded the Israelites to utterly destroy idolaters whose land they sought to reserve for the worship of their deity (Deut 7:2, 16, and 20:16–17). ... According to Stannard, this view of war contributed to the ... destruction of the Native peoples in the Americas. It was this view that also led to the destruction of European Jewry. Accordingly, it is important to look at this particular segment of the Old Testament: it not only describes a situation when a group attempts to totally destroy other groups, it also had a major influence on shaping thought and belief systems that permitted, and even inspired, genocide.[182]



So, I've provided MORE citations that show that people agree it was genocide in the Bible. I win.
“And do you think that unto such as you
A maggot-minded, starved, fanatic crew
God gave a secret, and denied it me?
Well, well—what matters it? Believe that, too!”
― Omar Khayyâm

Post Reply