For once, I'd like to hear people speak from knowledge of Jewish history rather from the lack of knowledge of Jewish history so you can be considered credible. Any takers?
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Moderator: Moderators
THis is not really a debate topic, but more a question for a certain set of forum members. I don't see that there is any proposition or set of propositions to debate.Carico wrote:I've been hearing so many claims here from people who claim that the bible isn't the truth. So from what knowledge of Jewish history do you make those claims?
For once, I'd like to hear people speak from knowledge of Jewish history rather from the lack of knowledge of Jewish history so you can be considered credible. Any takers?
Wouldn't it be more useful to be knowledgeable in christian history rather than jewish? After all if you are trying to prove the bible true jewish history can only speak of the old testament.Carico wrote:I've been hearing so many claims here from people who claim that the bible isn't the truth. So from what knowledge of Jewish history do you make those claims?
For once, I'd like to hear people speak from knowledge of Jewish history rather from the lack of knowledge of Jewish history so you can be considered credible. Any takers?
Sorry, but one needs to be knowledgeable about Jewish history in order to claim that the bible is false and not historical truth. Since Christianity is based on the bible, then unless one presents knowledge that it's false by historical documents, then his claim that the bible is false is called slander because he cannot back up his claims by facts. So let's hear your facts or you have no case against the bible.Wyvern wrote:Wouldn't it be more useful to be knowledgeable in christian history rather than jewish? After all if you are trying to prove the bible true jewish history can only speak of the old testament.Carico wrote:I've been hearing so many claims here from people who claim that the bible isn't the truth. So from what knowledge of Jewish history do you make those claims?
For once, I'd like to hear people speak from knowledge of Jewish history rather from the lack of knowledge of Jewish history so you can be considered credible. Any takers?
You need to understand the bible is ONLY a religious text, nothing more. It is not a science book it is not a history text it is just a religious text that many people have seen fit to interpret nearly every single word in it to fit into their agenda. To claim that you have the truth of the bible just means you are the latest of an army of people through history that have made that claim and you are just as correct as any of them.
How can christianity be based on the bible? You do understand don't you that the bible didn't come together as a single volume until the council of Nicea? All the books of the bible were at one time actual separate books until the council came around and decided what was official doctrine and left out that which they decided what was not.Carico wrote:Sorry, but one needs to be knowledgeable about Jewish history in order to claim that the bible is false and not historical truth. Since Christianity is based on the bible, then unless one presents knowledge that it's false by historical documents, then his claim that the bible is false is called slander because he cannot back up his claims by facts. So let's hear your facts or you have no case against the bible.Wyvern wrote:Wouldn't it be more useful to be knowledgeable in christian history rather than jewish? After all if you are trying to prove the bible true jewish history can only speak of the old testament.Carico wrote:I've been hearing so many claims here from people who claim that the bible isn't the truth. So from what knowledge of Jewish history do you make those claims?
For once, I'd like to hear people speak from knowledge of Jewish history rather from the lack of knowledge of Jewish history so you can be considered credible. Any takers?
You need to understand the bible is ONLY a religious text, nothing more. It is not a science book it is not a history text it is just a religious text that many people have seen fit to interpret nearly every single word in it to fit into their agenda. To claim that you have the truth of the bible just means you are the latest of an army of people through history that have made that claim and you are just as correct as any of them.