Why does the bible not repudiate slavery?
Moderator: Moderators
- Furrowed Brow
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 3720
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:29 am
- Location: Here
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: Why does the bible not repudiate slavery?
Post #2The most plausible explanation is that it dragged its morality from the society the writers lived in.Furrowed Brow wrote:Why does the bible not repudiate slavery?
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Post #3
Could it be that God does not disapprove of slavery?
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 22953
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 907 times
- Been thanked: 1339 times
- Contact:
Re: Why does the bible not repudiate slavery?
Post #4The bible is silent on any issues that are not directly related God's purpose and plan of salvation. Having imbued humans with a conscience individuals and societies would thereafter be held accountable for their actions on that basis, regardless of whether The Creator made a direct commented on any given subject or not.Why does the bible not repudiate slavery?
When any institution, government, individual has taken action in direct opposition to the development of His purpose God has intervened, otherwise he has left mankind to develop their own systems much to our collective chagrin (see Ecc 8:9). Slavery is one of those tragic systems.
SLAVERY AND THE MOSAIC LAW
When the worlds systems have impacted on his people (and subsequently his purpose) God has from necessity regulated. The existence of poverty as well as the sparing of the lives of some in the nations they conquered meant that there would be those that would be in a position of servitude. The Mosaic law regulated for this in a way that reflects God's general attitude to slavery* but the total abolishment of this feature of human civilisation at the time was neither feasible not essential to the realization of his purpose.
What is God's attitude to Slavery?
The bible is a book of both law and principle. The principles cover the range of human experience and allow the perceptive reader to deduce whether something is "good" or "bad" in God's view. In short not everything is explicitly stated, but may be implicit in scriptural principle:
- *treat your neighbour (fellow human being) as you want to be treated (Matt 7:12)
*to love everyone including your "enemy" (Math 5: 44)
*that all humans are equal in the eyes of God (Act 10: 35)
*human domination causes human suffering (Ecc 8:9b)
Further reading...
http://www.watchtower.org/e/20010908a/article_01.htm
RELATED POSTS
Since God did not impose the death penalty for unintentional manslaughterdid that not make him less just than society?
viewtopic.php?p=1079324#p1079324
What is God's attitude to slavery?
viewtopic.php?p=368781#p36878
Why didnt Jesus simply abolish slavery practices?
viewtopic.php?p=1078415#p1078415
Why does Christian scripture not call for the abolition of Slavery? [this post]
viewtopic.php?p=1020929#p1020929
Last edited by JehovahsWitness on Mon Oct 24, 2022 3:20 pm, edited 7 times in total.
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: Why does the bible not repudiate slavery?
Post #5Because in the time period the Bible was written, it was not economically feasible to repudiate it and still maintain a degree of civilization.. it is only when technology has gotten to the point we do not require as much manual labor that we could get rid of it (although ti is still around much more than we admit)Furrowed Brow wrote:Why does the bible not repudiate slavery?
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Why does the bible not repudiate slavery?
Post #6Why does the bible not repudiate slavery?
This is a bit of an untestable assertion. Given that outside of the Bible, we have no way of determining what is or is not directly related to God's purpose and plan of salvation, you end up running around in circles.JehovahsWitness wrote:The bible is silent on any issues that are not directly related God's purpose and plan of salvation.
The Bible does not repudiate slavery, thus slavery per se is not related to God's purpose and plan of salvation. The Bible dictates the policy about the appropriate length of hair according to gender, therefore it may be related to God's purpose and plan of salvation.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 22953
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 907 times
- Been thanked: 1339 times
- Contact:
Re: Why does the bible not repudiate slavery?
Post #7God's Purpose and related issues.McCulloch wrote:Why does the bible not repudiate slavery?This is a bit of an untestable assertion. Given that outside of the Bible, we have no way of determining what is or is not directly related to God's purpose and plan of salvation, you end up running around in circles.JehovahsWitness wrote:The bible is silent on any issues that are not directly related God's purpose and plan of salvation.
The Bible does not repudiate slavery, thus slavery per se is not related to God's purpose and plan of salvation. The Bible dictates the policy about the appropriate length of hair according to gender, therefore it may be related to God's purpose and plan of salvation.
Logically, if an omnipotent being doesn't do something, since no existing force can impose its will on him, he must be refrainting because he does not want to do that thing and/or it is not his purpose. Alternatively then, we can say, if God does or expresses a desire to do something, it is his purpose (Is 55:11) . God explicitly states his Divine purpose in scripture (Gen 1: 27, 28; 2:3) and the progressive revelation of that purpose is developed in its pages (Gen 2:15; Ro 8:28-30). The pattern of these revelations permits humans to descern the direction of his will and what is or is not related to it although this understanding has itself been progressive (see Eph 3:3, 4)
To illustrate: A man explains his project to build a house. Observers see a man building a house although at first it may not be evident why he goes about it in a certain way. Knowing what he is doing and observing why he does certain things would enable the reasonable observers to deduce that not doing one of the other merriads of things because he is dedicated to achieving his primary purpose, that of constructing the house.
In a similar way that observers, aware of the purpose would not wonder why the builder is not buying a toutou and taking ballet lessons, and is not knitting a bobble hat and training dancing poodles, it is possible for the serious bible scholar aware of the purpose and plan God has expressed in his Word to logically conclude that certain things are not directly related to the central themes and purpose as expressed through the divine revelation.
The opposite is also true; just as seeing the man, find a stone, to sharpen the axe to cut the tree, to build the beam to support the roof of the house that he's building, serious bible scholars have enough insight to understand how particular bible passages fit into the big picture.
Those with little or no scriptural insight just see a man digging up a stone.
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Post #8
From Post 4:
God figures it's important enough to mention not mixing fabrics, but just can't find the time to comment on that whole enslaving your fellow human beings deal. Is this dude asleep at the wheel? Or is He just not there to be commenting on such matters?
I challenge anyone to show a god has acted on this universe, much less on humans.
Given that whole "worship Me or I'm gonna getya" deal, maybe this ain't so surprising.
If God can cook me in a lake of fire for simply saying g-d, or some such, and then tells me to love my enemies, why he's as big a hypocrite as any I've known.
>snip reference<
Well don't that just beat all.JehovahsWitness wrote: The bible is silent on any issues that are not directly related God's purpose and plan of salvation. Having imbued humans with a conscience individuals and societies would thereafter be held accountable for their actions on that basis, regardless of whether The Creator made a direct commented on any given subject or not.
God figures it's important enough to mention not mixing fabrics, but just can't find the time to comment on that whole enslaving your fellow human beings deal. Is this dude asleep at the wheel? Or is He just not there to be commenting on such matters?
Unproven assertion.JehovahsWitness wrote: When any institution, government, individual has taken action in direct opposition to the development of His purpose God has intervened...
I challenge anyone to show a god has acted on this universe, much less on humans.
That sounds more like the nonaction of a god that ain't there.JehovahsWitness wrote: otherwise he has left mankind to develop their own systems much to our collective chagrin (see Ecc 8:9). Slavery is one of those tragic systems.
Wouldn't ya know it - God can create an entire universe, but can't stop humans from enslaving others.JehovahsWitness wrote: SLAVERY AND THE MOSAIC LAW
When the worlds systems have impacted on his people (and subsequently his purpose) God has from necessity regulated. The existence of poverty as well as the sparing of the lives of some in the nations they conquered meant that there would be those that would be in a position of servitude. The Mosaic law regulated for this in a way that reflects God's general attitude to slavery* but the total abolishment of this feature of human civilisation at the time was neither feasible not essential to the realization of his purpose.
Given that whole "worship Me or I'm gonna getya" deal, maybe this ain't so surprising.
Seems by not mentioning don't do it, god is cool with go ahead and do it.JehovahsWitness wrote: What is God's attitude to Slavery?
The bible is a book of both law and principle. The principles cover the range of human experience and allow the perceptive reader to deduce whether something is "good" or "bad" in God's view. In short not everything is explicitly stated, but may be implicit in scriptural principle:
This seems counter to the claim above that God would interfere when folks were doing something He didn't like, here of course that being slavery.JehovahsWitness wrote: *treat your neighbour (fellow human being) as you want to be treated (Matt 7:12)
I fling poo at my enemies.JehovahsWitness wrote: *to love everyone including your "enemy" (Math 5: 44)
If God can cook me in a lake of fire for simply saying g-d, or some such, and then tells me to love my enemies, why he's as big a hypocrite as any I've known.
Though some are more equal than others.JehovahsWitness wrote: *that all humans are equal in the eyes of God (Act 10: 35)
It took God to tell us that?JehovahsWitness wrote: *human domination causes human suffering (Ecc 8:9b)
No need to thank me for fixin' that.JehovahsWitness wrote: The above principles and many others, allow the decerning reader to accurately [strike]assess[/strike] make wild unsubtantiated guesses at God's attitude to not only slavery but many other manmade structures and institutions that he is temporarily allowing to exist.
"Y'all be mindful of your slave-masters, ya hear!"JehovahsWitness wrote: God therefore addresses the question of slavery in addressing the underlying principles while expecting his people to live and respect the systems they find themselves in until his final intervention to the relief of all mankind.
>snip reference<
- Slopeshoulder
- Banned
- Posts: 3367
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:46 pm
- Location: San Francisco
Post #9
Simple: because the many men who wrote the bible didn't repudiate slavery. They were not that evolved at the time. Wise in many ways, they hadn't got there yet.
Any other interpreatation is mental gymnasitics to support a fantasy. Might as well talk about Frodo Baggins.
Any other interpreatation is mental gymnasitics to support a fantasy. Might as well talk about Frodo Baggins.
-
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3762
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:19 pm
- Location: City of the "Angels"
- Been thanked: 5 times
Post #10
That is correct. There was no social safety network like Welfare back then. However, Israelite slavery is far different than all other forms of slavery. It actually considers the slave's rights and feelings.McCulloch wrote:Could it be that God does not disapprove of slavery?
Thus, on hard times, or if you found yourself in debt, you could do a 7 year plan, likely to a wealthy family that had the means to provide food and shelter right from the family lands. Sounds like a much better deal than scavenging for berries and running from slave-traders.
Conditions were so good that apparently there was a provision for slaves who didn't want to have the "curse of freedom" that involved an involuntary ear-piercing with a pick.
Now compare Israelite standards of treatment of slaves to an Egyptians' or Assyrians' or Canaanite's or Turkish slave.
The race that is most notable for slavery is SLAVS, so in versions of Jewish thought that involve "rebirth", being born as a Slav that got sacked from a Turkish raid might in fact have application to being reborn to deserve such (i.e. was a slave-owner in preceding existence). It says quite clearly that Jews will see their sons and daughters sold as slaves. We Jews may be the oldest and most notoriously known "Slave Race" even FAR before races that got originally known for it such as the Slavs. And the Canaanites themselves are said to be "Slaves of slaves". Even Jesus makes the Canaanite woman admit she's as a "dog" compared to the Israelites. But perhaps I'm giving away my Jewish supremacism here.
The idea of slavery in Biblical thought being a bad thing is based on the idea that people don't deserve what they got even when the Bible directly says so. There are people who are today put in jail to do slave labor for growing plants based on Unconstitutional (and-counter-economic) Laws, are they not slaves to the profiteers who get paid to keep them?
Christians who think the Law is done away with and thus Slavery is a thing of the past should read Paul some more and then have another think.