In some other conversations about do homosexuals hound ceo's out of business I said that a boycott of goods or services is a consumers right if they disagree with the actions behaviors or positions of the CEO.
There is one such CEO that regardless of religious beliefs or sexual orientation that needs to go.
Desmund Hague was recently caught abusing a puppy he was pet sitting kicking the dog in the ribs swinging it around by the collar.
He is the CEO of centerplate. A company that provides stadium food services.
Question for debate.
Does the abuse of animals by the CEO necessitate a boycott of goods and services provided by the company in which the CEO is employed?
By not firing the CEO for such crude behavior is the board of directors enabling further abuse of the individual?
Desmund Hague
Moderator: Moderators
-
DanieltheDragon
- Savant
- Posts: 6224
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
- Location: Charlotte
- Been thanked: 1 time
Desmund Hague
Post #1Post 1: Wed Apr 01, 2015 10:48 am Otseng has been banned
Otseng has been banned for having multiple accounts and impersonating a moderator.
Otseng has been banned for having multiple accounts and impersonating a moderator.
Post #2
Necessitate? No. It's a choice after all.
Should you boycott the company because of the individual? No. Like trying to shoot one guilty individual among a barrel of fish.
Is not firing the CEO "enabling" further abuse?
If enabling means "not disabling", but it doesn't. Both are actions.
Doing nothing is not enabling - imho, that seems to be a way of phrasing it such that it seems that you are guilty of an act rather than not guilty of another act.
Should you boycott the company because of the individual? No. Like trying to shoot one guilty individual among a barrel of fish.
Is not firing the CEO "enabling" further abuse?
If enabling means "not disabling", but it doesn't. Both are actions.
Doing nothing is not enabling - imho, that seems to be a way of phrasing it such that it seems that you are guilty of an act rather than not guilty of another act.
