I've given specifics from scientists exposing them as misrepresenting what science has found, and your only rebuttal is a generality, a claim without evidence. You've been true to your word, you won't use evidence to support your claims, just empty words.Volbrigade wrote: Your characterization of what men like Batten, Ham, Sarfati, et. al. propose is so far afield, that it completely undermines your credibility in other areas -- especially the specious claim that "they've been exposed...".
In 1 Samuel 15:2-3 the 'Lord' commands the Hebrews:
'Thus saith the LORD of hosts ... go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.'
You've offered no response to this. The depravity appears to be God's. He's the one you claim called for the murder of women, infants, and suckling babes.
Your routine is tiresome. In response to actual Bible verses and to specific findings of scientists you only offer personal opinion that avoids the issue. This technique fools no one; it serves only as your announcement you can do no better.