Word games / definition games
In these debates it is not uncommon for Apologists to insist that others accept non-standard definitions of words used in English language Bibles.
Yes, there are esoteric definitions, specialized professional definitions, personal definitions, jargon and slang usages, etc.JLB32168 wrote: Dictionaries are tools for the meanings of words, but they are by no means the only source of meanings for words.
However, in public debate no one has the authority to decide that special definitions of common words be used. The above quote was someone's attempt to re-define slavery broadly enough to include pet ownership – based on “some PETA people consider it so� (or whatever).
Is there compelling reason that those involved in a discussion must accept a non-standard or esoteric definition preferred by an Apologist?
Is there assurance that an Apologist knows better what biblical words 'really mean' than Non-Theists?