Forum | Welcome | Debate Rules | Links | Facebook | Twitter | Donate  
Debating Christianity and Religion
Christian Debate Forum
 
 FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in

Is "being born this way" an acceptable justificati
What legal precedence can arise?

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  
Reply to topic    Debating Christianity and Religion Forum Index -> Religion and Sexuality
Author Message
KingandPriest
First Post
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 7:52 pm  Is "being born this way" an acceptable justificati Reply with quote

An all to common argument I have heard to support homosexuality or transgender-ism is the concept of being born this way. As a Christian I could relate to the concept of being born with a proclivity towards a certain activity which may lead to sin.

Recently, I heard a discussion which reminded me of one of my undergraduate law courses. This was years ago, so I apologize if I do not present as good an argument as this professor. In the course, the professor argued for maintaining the definition of marriage as between one man and one woman because in the court of law, setting a legal precedence on one matter can lead to unintended applications of the decision later on.

As we know, the law is tricky in that a judge may be forced to rule one way based on precedence rather than fairness or equity. To this end, the professor argued that if the law was changed (as it has been today) because one judge or a few judges deemed it acceptable to broaden the definition of marriage, then a precedent could be set for future changes resulting in "undesired effects."

This now leads to the conversation on being "born this way." When a person is making an argument from the position of being "born this way" are they arguing that any person who is born with certain attractions should be allowed to love who ever they wish?

I ask, because many individuals who are currently considered sexual pedophiles can argue that they were born this way, and were attracted to younger people since they were a child. Is it wrong to condemn these individuals for their attractions but praise or support an individual who has homosexual feelings?

If the only answer is because they are breaking the law, then it is fair to argue that homosexuality was once illegal in many nations in the world. Is is possible that a precedent has been set to allow those who were once demonized and criminalized as pedophiles to join the LGBT community, as another misunderstood and rejected people group?

Why treat those who have been "born with a attraction" to the same sex differently from those who have been "born with an attraction" to a younger individual?


In some places, consent for marriage can occur as young as 13. Could those individuals who desire to have relationships and marriage to 13 year old, use the precedent of changing the definition of marriage to expand the parameters on consent as well?

What about being born with an attraction towards animals, or physical objects? The porn industry is evidence that people have these desires. Should they be allowed to marry what they love as well? In short, the professor argued that the court of law does not ask, "where does it end" if precedent has been set and no new laws are written.
steellord123 Offline
Newbie
Joined: 10 Dec 2016
Total posts: 6
Gender: Undisclosed

48.87 tokens
Post BBCode URL - Right click and save to clipboard to use later in post Post 81: Thu Feb 02, 2017 6:07 am  Re: Is "being born this way" an acceptable justifi Reply

[Replying to post 79 by KingandPriest]

Race used to be a qualifier for marriage, and is no longer. In the 40 years between Loving and Obergefell did it lead to what we today consider minors (under 18) able to marry? Of course not. The two are just unrelated. Have the legal status of consent to marry period, and having the correct race or gender to legally marry one's chosen partner, are separate issues with separate arguments - a person is developmentally mature to enter binding contracts with XYZ ramifications vs a person is in love with the same sex or someone of a different race, or whatever
Back to top
Like this post
View user's profile   
steellord123 Offline
Newbie
Joined: 10 Dec 2016
Total posts: 6
Gender: Undisclosed

48.87 tokens
Post BBCode URL - Right click and save to clipboard to use later in post Post 82: Thu Feb 02, 2017 6:10 am  Re: Is "being born this way" an acceptable justifi Reply

Quote:

What I don't understand is the religious rights obsession with homosexuality. It is not the governments business to get in the personal lives of two or more consenting adults.


No but it's religion's business they figure and they want religion to run the government so. In fact if they don't fight it every step of the way they are giving in to satan, or some such
Back to top
Like this post
View user's profile   
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Debating Christianity and Religion Forum Index -> Religion and Sexuality All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Page 9 of 9
Facebook
Tweet

 






Hymn Lyrics Plus

On The Web | Ecodia | Facebook | Twitter


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.   Produced by Ecodia.


Mobile   |  Lo-Fi Version