Civil and engaging debate on Christianity and religious issues

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

Reply to topic
KingandPriest
First Post
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 7:52 pm  Is "being born this way" an acceptable justificati Reply with quote

An all to common argument I have heard to support homosexuality or transgender-ism is the concept of being born this way. As a Christian I could relate to the concept of being born with a proclivity towards a certain activity which may lead to sin.

Recently, I heard a discussion which reminded me of one of my undergraduate law courses. This was years ago, so I apologize if I do not present as good an argument as this professor. In the course, the professor argued for maintaining the definition of marriage as between one man and one woman because in the court of law, setting a legal precedence on one matter can lead to unintended applications of the decision later on.

As we know, the law is tricky in that a judge may be forced to rule one way based on precedence rather than fairness or equity. To this end, the professor argued that if the law was changed (as it has been today) because one judge or a few judges deemed it acceptable to broaden the definition of marriage, then a precedent could be set for future changes resulting in "undesired effects."

This now leads to the conversation on being "born this way." When a person is making an argument from the position of being "born this way" are they arguing that any person who is born with certain attractions should be allowed to love who ever they wish?

I ask, because many individuals who are currently considered sexual pedophiles can argue that they were born this way, and were attracted to younger people since they were a child. Is it wrong to condemn these individuals for their attractions but praise or support an individual who has homosexual feelings?

If the only answer is because they are breaking the law, then it is fair to argue that homosexuality was once illegal in many nations in the world. Is is possible that a precedent has been set to allow those who were once demonized and criminalized as pedophiles to join the LGBT community, as another misunderstood and rejected people group?

Why treat those who have been "born with a attraction" to the same sex differently from those who have been "born with an attraction" to a younger individual?


In some places, consent for marriage can occur as young as 13. Could those individuals who desire to have relationships and marriage to 13 year old, use the precedent of changing the definition of marriage to expand the parameters on consent as well?

What about being born with an attraction towards animals, or physical objects? The porn industry is evidence that people have these desires. Should they be allowed to marry what they love as well? In short, the professor argued that the court of law does not ask, "where does it end" if precedent has been set and no new laws are written.
Post BBCode URL - Right click and save to clipboard to use later in post Post 81: Thu Feb 02, 2017 6:07 am
Reply
Re: Is "being born this way" an acceptable justifi

Like this post
[Replying to post 79 by KingandPriest]

Race used to be a qualifier for marriage, and is no longer. In the 40 years between Loving and Obergefell did it lead to what we today consider minors (under 18) able to marry? Of course not. The two are just unrelated. Have the legal status of consent to marry period, and having the correct race or gender to legally marry one's chosen partner, are separate issues with separate arguments - a person is developmentally mature to enter binding contracts with XYZ ramifications vs a person is in love with the same sex or someone of a different race, or whatever

Goto top, bottom
View user's profile 
Post BBCode URL - Right click and save to clipboard to use later in post Post 82: Thu Feb 02, 2017 6:10 am
Reply
Re: Is "being born this way" an acceptable justifi

Like this post
Quote:

What I don't understand is the religious rights obsession with homosexuality. It is not the governments business to get in the personal lives of two or more consenting adults.


No but it's religion's business they figure and they want religion to run the government so. In fact if they don't fight it every step of the way they are giving in to satan, or some such

Goto top, bottom
View user's profile 
Post BBCode URL - Right click and save to clipboard to use later in post Post 83: Wed Mar 08, 2017 3:19 pm
Reply
Re: Is "being born this way" an acceptable justifi

Like this post
KingandPriest wrote:



As the feelings in society changes about what is acceptable sexual behavior, the thoughts on "the age of consent" will undoubtedly change. Currently 18 is the current consensus, but what prevents this from changing just like public perception of homosexuality has changed because of forced changes to social norms.

False, in most states the age of consent is 16 or 17 and in most countries the age of consent is lower than 18.

KingandPriest wrote:

50 years ago, it would have been inconceivable to think same sex marriage would have been deemed legal. 50 years from now, the perception about age of consent may also change.


True, over the years the age of consent has generally gone up, so in 50 years the age of consent in many places may be higher.

Goto top, bottom
View user's profile 
Display posts from previous:   

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

Jump to:  
Facebook
Tweet

 




On The Web | Ecodia | Facebook | Twitter

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.   Produced by Ecodia.

Igloo   |  Lo-Fi Version