[Replying to post 1 by liamconnor]
My thoughts on this are as follows.1) I am an atheist on philosophical grounds: mainly the problem of evil. I have no interest in discussing that topic. My mind is set.
Atheism does not have reasons for lacking belief in GODs. It is simply a position. Therefore there are no grounds necessary for an atheist to lack beliefs in GODs. An atheist simply holds a position.
Thus, reasons for lacking belief, such as "your mind is made up regarding the problem of evil", are besides the point.
"I am an atheist because I lack belief in GODs." is all that atheism is.
"I lack belief in GODs because {__________}" is something else again.
It is like saying
"I am an atheist because {__________}" when the fact of the matter is, one is an atheist because one lacks belief in GODs, and that is all.
'Why' one lacks belief in GODs can be for any number of reasons, not all of which those calling themselves 'atheists' share, just like theists don't all share the same beliefs.
The reason I make comment about this is because there is often complaint that theists don't understand what atheism is and what atheists are and a big part of that reason is because statements such as this one, can and do confuse people. It muddies the waters and lumps all types of atheists into the same category.
The reason there are subsets of atheism is meant to distinguish the types of atheists and it would be better all round if atheists identified as being the type they best fit with when interacting in a public setting. Just as it can be helpful to a non theist to know what type of theist they are interacting with.
That is what I think. What do you think about this?
Cheers
William