hate is our friend

[DPMartin]

There has been a propaganda push using the cattle’s (American public) panic knowledge, coloring hate as evil. They run out into the streets hating hate and hater’s alike. Showing their ignorance that they hate themselves, if they hate people who hate. Moronic hypocrites being manipulated by their own fears and emotions. Squealing as loud as posable like pigs do when they are restrained, for no reason but fear.

Hate is necessary in society and the expression is critical to its survival, it’s called law. Law is the expression of what is hated by a society and the execution of that same law is what is done to those who do what is hated expressed in the law, or who is hated for whatever reason expressed in the law.

The view that hate oppresses is correct, it’s supposed to, the law oppresses that which is against it. Hence, the very reason the law is there.

So, hate has its place, and its only fools who see that hate is evil.

[Divine Insight]

So, hate has its place, and its only fools who see that hate is evil.

If hate "has its place", then hate that is "out of place" would still be evil.

Protests against "out-of-place-hate" are then justified.

Hate is necessary in society and the expression is critical to its survival, it’s called law. Law is the expression of what is hated by a society and the execution of that same law is what is done to those who do what is hated expressed in the law, or who is hated for whatever reason expressed in the law.

If you can justify laws as "Good Hatred", then you should also be able to justify protests against "out-of-place-hatred" as also being "Good Hatred".

[DPMartin]

So, hate has its place, and its only fools who see that hate is evil.

If hate "has its place", then hate that is "out of place" would still be evil.

Protests against "out-of-place-hate" are then justified.

Hate is necessary in society and the expression is critical to its survival, it’s called law. Law is the expression of what is hated by a society and the execution of that same law is what is done to those who do what is hated expressed in the law, or who is hated for whatever reason expressed in the law.

If you can justify laws as "Good Hatred", then you should also be able to justify protests against "out-of-place-hatred" as also being "Good Hatred".

if its against the law, then its hate in its proper place in accordance to those within the agreed law, correct? it is the law that justifies in the of nations. its the agreement that justifies hatred of betrayal or offence of the agreement, or law.

if no law is offended, then the law will not justify hatred.

[Divine Insight]

Actually law never justifies hatred.

Let's not forget that this was YOUR DEFINITION, not anyone else's.

Law is not hatred. And neither is protesting against injustice.

[Aetixintro]

[Replying to post 1 by DPMartin]

There is a difference in hating (sadistic) rapists and hating children.

There is a difference still in hating child torturers and acting out the hate of children so that you torture them.

Thus, in a sense, hating (intolerance of crime) the haters (child torturers) makes it GOOD!

[2ndRateMind]

There has been a propaganda push using the cattle’s (American public) panic knowledge, coloring hate as evil. They run out into the streets hating hate and hater’s alike. Showing their ignorance that they hate themselves, if they hate people who hate. Moronic hypocrites being manipulated by their own fears and emotions. Squealing as loud as posable like pigs do when they are restrained, for no reason but fear.

Hate is necessary in society and the expression is critical to its survival, it’s called law. Law is the expression of what is hated by a society and the execution of that same law is what is done to those who do what is hated expressed in the law, or who is hated for whatever reason expressed in the law.

The view that hate oppresses is correct, it’s supposed to, the law oppresses that which is against it. Hence, the very reason the law is there.

So, hate has its place, and its only fools who see that hate is evil.

So, the law cannot legislate either for or against hate. It cannot make people hate, or not hate. The best it can do afterwards is pick up the pieces of some hate-motivated action or activity, and try to restore some degree of just restitution. And beforehand, to provide a degree of guidance as to exactly what society will, and will not, tolerate. Either way, the law is not really about hate, just the mitigation of hate.

Generally though, I prefer to consider love than hate. I commend this attitude; it makes for an altogether better life.

Best wishes, 2RM.

[DPMartin]

Actually law never justifies hatred.

Let's not forget that this was YOUR DEFINITION, not anyone else's.

Law is not hatred. And neither is protesting against injustice.

well this is the OED "the" English language on the act of hate:

To hold in very strong dislike; to detest; to bear malice to.

and what is it that the law has toward murderers rapists pedophiles thieves and the like? the law doesn't love these, at least not in this world? and the law justifies hatred towards this and those who do them.


also one may have the right to protest which is a part of some agreements in the world but that doesn't make one right about what one may be protesting..

[DPMartin]

There has been a propaganda push using the cattle’s (American public) panic knowledge, coloring hate as evil. They run out into the streets hating hate and hater’s alike. Showing their ignorance that they hate themselves, if they hate people who hate. Moronic hypocrites being manipulated by their own fears and emotions. Squealing as loud as posable like pigs do when they are restrained, for no reason but fear.

Hate is necessary in society and the expression is critical to its survival, it’s called law. Law is the expression of what is hated by a society and the execution of that same law is what is done to those who do what is hated expressed in the law, or who is hated for whatever reason expressed in the law.

The view that hate oppresses is correct, it’s supposed to, the law oppresses that which is against it. Hence, the very reason the law is there.

So, hate has its place, and its only fools who see that hate is evil.

So, the law cannot legislate either for or against hate. It cannot make people hate, or not hate. The best it can do afterwards is pick up the pieces of some hate-motivated action or activity, and try to restore some degree of just restitution. And beforehand, to provide a degree of guidance as to exactly what society will, and will not, tolerate. Either way, the law is not really about hate, just the mitigation of hate.

Generally though, I prefer to consider love than hate. I commend this attitude; it makes for an altogether better life.

Best wishes, 2RM.

the law can justify hate and who or what to hate, as in: To hold in very strong dislike; to detest; to bear malice to.

the doesn't make hate it justifies it.

[TSGracchus]

[Replying to post 1 by DPMartin]

Hate disables understanding. You become what you hate.

“Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster... for when you gaze long into the abyss. The abyss gazes also into you.�
--- Friedrich Nietzsche