Is there a good reason to believe that an untestable proposition is true?twobitsmedia wrote:I agree that God is not testable by scientific methodology. That is the failure of science in that is is unable to test Spirit. That, to me, does not mean God is not fact. It just means he is not testable by those methods. Those who require evidence for faith want the testable scientific God, or so they say. As a philosophy major I would question any educational organization that exempts philosophizing about God. Many Greek philosophers did.
Is there a good reason to believe in the untestable?
Moderator: Moderators
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Is there a good reason to believe in the untestable?
Post #1Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
Post #32
The comparison you have drawn between the unearthing of archaeological artefacts and the cosmos as whole rests on having good reasons to infer ID in the latter. In the case of Archaeology there are unambiguous signs of human intellect in the adaptation and forging of materials. Your sarcasm hinges around there being equally unambiguous signs of intelligence in the creation of the cosmos. This "Big News Story" has yet to be posted outside of Church.Fisherking wrote:Yeah, those silly, silly archaeologistsQED wrote: Just so long as people don't continue to insist that an apparent creation is evidence of a creator, then they're welcome to their faith.
Let me remind you that the adjective "Apparent" entered our vocabulary to describe the way things may appear to be but are not necessarily so. Your approach seems to be to take everything "at face value". Before we gave up doing this, we thought the Sun revolved around a flat Earth.