benchwarmer wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 3:59 pm
As an ex-Christian, I know exactly what it involves. Are you of the impression that people who are no longer Christians never were one? I know that's one common apologetic that some Christians like to pull out when things get inconvenient for them.
Though it varies, I would say that many who professed to be Christian are that only in name and tradition. The former likely left by seeing the failings of the apostate teachings and practices. Moses and Jesus didn't teach the immortal soul, hell, trinity, cross, rapture or that all good people go to heaven. They didn't celebrate pagan holidays like birthdays, New Years, Christmas, Easter, Valentines Day, etc. Those things are modern day Christianity so how can it be that they follow Jesus's teachings? (2 Timothy 4:3-4)
benchwarmer wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 3:59 pm
We can only go by what is written in the New Testament about what Jesus said/wanted. As usual, this is up to the interpretation of every single Christian. Are you aware of how many Christian denominations there are? What might that tell you about Christians distilling what Jesus really wanted?
Not much really, other than the obvious which you pointed out. Tradition probably has more to do with it than anything. The variation in politics is comparable. Democrat vs. Republican here in the states. They support the ideology of the party. If there were only one Christian "denomination" there would remain differences of opinions regarding what Jesus taught. Some of those would be legitimate and some ideologically, culturally, traditionally or even politically founded. The original Christians were democratic, they voted by majority. This alone suggests variation.
benchwarmer wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 3:59 pm
Speaking of nonsense... At what point did I say I wanted to make anyone feel bad?
Excuse me, but I don't know who you are. I'm not familiar with you. Maybe I was addressing you by erroneously thinking you were Boatsandguitars? I think part of the militant atheist strategy, if you can call it that, does involve trying to make theists feel bad; slavery, genocide, hell, etc. and conversely the ideological theists do the same; abortion, homosexuality, morality, etc. But I wasn't necessarily suggesting you were doing that in this specific case because I was likely addressing the OP.
benchwarmer wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 3:59 pm
This feels like some sort of projection based on the uncomfortableness you might be feeling when it's pointed out what's actually in the Bible.
Part of the reason I'm here is that I look for that. I've learned a great deal from it and don't at all feel uncomfortable with it.
benchwarmer wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 3:59 pm
Maybe I'm wrong (wouldn't be the first time), but it sounds like this is making you uncomfortable because now you need to figure out which things Jesus said and/or did that you should do and which ones you can safely ignore. Sounds like you are currently ignoring Matthew 19:21 and Luke 12:33.
Jesus said those things to me or someone else in a different time and place? Having thought so carefully on the matter, which of my possessions do you think Jesus would have me give to the poor? Now, at this point, I'm saying you want to make someone feel bad. Last summer my mother died and left me all of her possessions. She had a lot of possessions. She thought I should sell them. I gave them to the poor. Literally truckloads. You need not worry about me when it comes to figuring out what Jesus wants me to do. That isn't a boast because I come to it naturally. The reason for that isn't religion, it's a mutual contempt for the system of things, a separation that goes beyond "church and state." A separation from the world. It manifests itself in ways mere ideological fixation doesn't. Without the accompanying hypocrisy.
benchwarmer wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 3:59 pm
I'm certainly not looking to make anyone uncomfortable (got enough of that in the church),
My observations of those who have left the church for the state is out of the frying pan into the fire.
benchwarmer wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 3:59 pm
I'm just asking Christians the simple question of which of Jesus's teachings are 'valid' and which ones can safely be ignored and why.
All of Jesus's teachings are valid. Why? Because he was our model. He is our goal. To reflect the father, Jehovah God, and desire with all of our soul, the vindication of his name and resulting in the unanimous acknowledgment of his rightful sovereignty. I don't judge the shortcomings of people, or even myself, in regards to our endeavor to do that to the best of our ability. I simply point out the hypocrisy of our behaving as ideologues. Sin. In other words, I don't judge our effort, I judge the things that get in the way.