Head-to-head subforum request

Post by **otseng** » Tue May 08, 2012 10:08 pm

If you would like to debate in a head-to-head debate, find an opponent and agree on a topic. Then both of you must post here with the topic title you two have agreed on and then send me a PM with the link to your request. You two should also agree beforehand the format of the debate. I'll then give you both membership to the usergroup. You are then free to create the topic and debate.

After the debate is over, PM me and I'll lock the thread and remove you from the usergroup.

Post by **otseng** » Sat Aug 20, 2016 4:03 pm

[Replying to post 100 by Blastcat]

Added both of you.

rikuoamero · Post by **rikuoamero** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 4:19 pm

Hi. Myself and For_The_Kingdom have agreed to debate the following question

The Modal Ontological Argument: Is it a logically sound/valid Argument for the Existence of God?

We have agreed not to have a finite number of responses. We're to go on until one of us either admits defeat or just plain calls it quits.
FtK will be going first. FtK I expect will be arguing in the positive, while I will of course be arguing in the negative.

Post by **otseng** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:13 pm

[Replying to rikuoamero]

For_The_Kingdom needs to also confirm here before I grant access.

For_The_Kingdom · Post by **For_The_Kingdom** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 1:40 am

otseng wrote: [Replying to rikuoamero]

For_The_Kingdom needs to also confirm here before I grant access.

The day of judgment is upon you, rikuo

Post by **otseng** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:17 am

[Replying to post 104 by For_The_Kingdom]

Added For_The_Kingdom and rikuoamero to H2H group.

wiploc · Post by **wiploc** » Wed Mar 22, 2017 2:06 pm

For the Kingdom and I want to debate the MOA (modal ontological argument).

He'll say it's valid and sound, that it proves something, and I'll take a contrary position.

For_The_Kingdom · Post by **For_The_Kingdom** » Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:52 pm

wiploc wrote: For the Kingdom and I want to debate the MOA (modal ontological argument).

He'll say it's valid and sound, that it proves something, and I'll take a contrary position.

^I am For_the_Kingdom, and I approve this post

Post by **otseng** » Wed Mar 22, 2017 11:36 pm

wiploc wrote: For the Kingdom and I want to debate the MOA (modal ontological argument).

Added.

Monta · Post by **Monta** » Wed Nov 01, 2017 8:33 am

[Replying to post 108 by otseng]

Don't know where to go to ask so I am here: Holy Huddle won't admit me.
i

Post by **otseng** » Wed Nov 01, 2017 9:01 am

[Replying to Monta]

Add yourself to the Christian usergroup and you can then access HH.

Debating Christianity and Religion

Head-to-head subforum request

Head-to-head subforum request

Re: Head-to-head subforum request