What is the logic behind Jesus' crucifixion?

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Justin108
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4471
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:28 am

What is the logic behind Jesus' crucifixion?

Post #1

Post by Justin108 »

This is arguably the core of the Christian faith that Jesus died for our sins and made it possible for us to live for eternity in heaven... but why did Jesus have to die in order for us to have our sins forgiven?

God makes the rules. There is no "God HAD to sacrifice Jesus" because God can do anything.

Christians often say that God cannot let sin go unpunished as it would be unjust; but is it any more just to sacrifice an innocent man on behalf of a guilty man? If a man rapes a little girl and the man's brother offers to go to prison on his behalf, would this be justice?

If god is satisfied by punishment without guilt (Jesus), why is he not satisfied with guilt without punishment?

Theodore A. Jones
Banned
Banned
Posts: 195
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 3:41 am

Re: What is the logic behind Jesus' crucifixion?

Post #531

Post by Theodore A. Jones »

Justin108 wrote:
Tex wrote:
Justin108 wrote:
This is arguably the core of the Christian faith that Jesus died for our sins and made it possible for us to live for eternity in heaven... but why did Jesus have to die in order for us to have our sins forgiven?

God makes the rules. There is no "God HAD to sacrifice Jesus" because God can do anything.

Christians often say that God cannot let sin go unpunished as it would be unjust; but is it any more just to sacrifice an innocent man on behalf of a guilty man? If a man rapes a little girl and the man's brother offers to go to prison on his behalf, would this be justice?

If god is satisfied by punishment without guilt (Jesus), why is he not satisfied with guilt without punishment?


You see.....The thing about God, is that God is the "master planner" And God will always do thing that we as humans will never understand.
So your question are just that....A way of trying to hurt are beliefs.
.
The problem is that if God "planned" to sacrifice Jesus then it implies that only by sacrificing Jesus could God have succeeded in whatever he planned. Surely an omnipotent being has the ability to achieve the same outcome without having to kill Jesus? He could have succeeded in whatever he wanted to do merely by snapping his fingers.

Men plan because their actions are hindered by what they can and can not do. Men plan to make a way around these hindrances. God has no hindrances to go around. He can achieve X by any means he likes.
Tex wrote:How can I, a creation ever understand God? IN the things I do....I Do. IN the thing I do not I must trust. I trust God because he was willing to give up that which he loved the most, in order to save what he could destroy in a blink of an eye
And my question is: Why did he HAVE to give up what he loved most?

Oh and by the way... God didn't give up a damn thing. Where is Jesus now? In heaven. How was he "given up" if he is sitting snugly next to God?

Tex wrote: We all have choices to make. One of them is to give your soul to God. If you do not, then you will never be able to withstand Satan.
Satan in heaven is too dangerous.
Stop preaching. This is a debate forum.






So all you have to offer is an "I don't know" and a bit of preaching. Your post is entirely useless.
God did not sacrifice Jesus. According to the bible he was murdered by the hands of wicked men which they had previously illegally justified to be a righteous action.

Theodore A. Jones
Banned
Banned
Posts: 195
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 3:41 am

Re: What is the logic behind Jesus' crucifixion?

Post #532

Post by Theodore A. Jones »

Justin108 wrote: This is arguably the core of the Christian faith that Jesus died for our sins and made it possible for us to live for eternity in heaven... but why did Jesus have to die in order for us to have our sins forgiven?

God makes the rules. There is no "God HAD to sacrifice Jesus" because God can do anything.

Christians often say that God cannot let sin go unpunished as it would be unjust; but is it any more just to sacrifice an innocent man on behalf of a guilty man? If a man rapes a little girl and the man's brother offers to go to prison on his behalf, would this be justice?

If god is satisfied by punishment without guilt (Jesus), why is he not satisfied with guilt without punishment?
Jesus did die for our sins to increase them by one count. But no person has, can nor will be a direct beneficiary of the sin of murder which jesus crucifixion is.

Theodore A. Jones
Banned
Banned
Posts: 195
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 3:41 am

Re: What is the logic behind Jesus' crucifixion?

Post #533

Post by Theodore A. Jones »

Justin108 wrote: This is arguably the core of the Christian faith that Jesus died for our sins and made it possible for us to live for eternity in heaven... but why did Jesus have to die in order for us to have our sins forgiven?

God makes the rules. There is no "God HAD to sacrifice Jesus" because God can do anything.

Christians often say that God cannot let sin go unpunished as it would be unjust; but is it any more just to sacrifice an innocent man on behalf of a guilty man? If a man rapes a little girl and the man's brother offers to go to prison on his behalf, would this be justice?

If god is satisfied by punishment without guilt (Jesus), why is he not satisfied with guilt without punishment?
Jesus did die for our sins to increase them by one count. But no person has, can nor will be a direct beneficiary of the sin of murder which jesus crucifixion is.

Dantalion
Guru
Posts: 1588
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 3:37 pm

Re: What is the logic behind Jesus' crucifixion?

Post #534

Post by Dantalion »

Theodore A. Jones wrote:
Justin108 wrote: This is arguably the core of the Christian faith that Jesus died for our sins and made it possible for us to live for eternity in heaven... but why did Jesus have to die in order for us to have our sins forgiven?

God makes the rules. There is no "God HAD to sacrifice Jesus" because God can do anything.

Christians often say that God cannot let sin go unpunished as it would be unjust; but is it any more just to sacrifice an innocent man on behalf of a guilty man? If a man rapes a little girl and the man's brother offers to go to prison on his behalf, would this be justice?

If god is satisfied by punishment without guilt (Jesus), why is he not satisfied with guilt without punishment?
Jesus did die for our sins to increase them by one count. But no person has, can nor will be a direct beneficiary of the sin of murder which jesus crucifixion is.
Thanks for clearing that up...
Pretty sure the people the people that wanted him dead were pleased.

Theodore A. Jones
Banned
Banned
Posts: 195
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 3:41 am

Re: What is the logic behind Jesus' crucifixion?

Post #535

Post by Theodore A. Jones »

Justin108 wrote: This is arguably the core of the Christian faith that Jesus died for our sins and made it possible for us to live for eternity in heaven... but why did Jesus have to die in order for us to have our sins forgiven?

God makes the rules. There is no "God HAD to sacrifice Jesus" because God can do anything.

Christians often say that God cannot let sin go unpunished as it would be unjust; but is it any more just to sacrifice an innocent man on behalf of a guilty man? If a man rapes a little girl and the man's brother offers to go to prison on his behalf, would this be justice?

If god is satisfied by punishment without guilt (Jesus), why is he not satisfied with guilt without punishment?
"When he comes he will convict the word of guilt in regard to (a) sin". Guilt in regard to sin is the primary factor remaining after Jesus crucifixion according to the bible. The assumption that God was satisfied by punishment is an assumptive error.

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: What is the logic behind Jesus' crucifixion?

Post #536

Post by Goat »

Theodore A. Jones wrote:
"When he comes he will convict the word of guilt in regard to (a) sin". Guilt in regard to sin is the primary factor remaining after Jesus crucifixion according to the bible. The assumption that God was satisfied by punishment is an assumptive error.
And how do you know? Can you show how you know?? Can you support your claim?
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
kayky
Prodigy
Posts: 4695
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 9:23 pm
Location: Kentucky

Post #537

Post by kayky »

The death and resurrection of Jesus can only be understood in mythic terms as a spiritual path of rebirth. Taken literally, the story makes no sense whatsoever. The very idea that God requires bloodshed in order to be appeased is one of the most primitive of religious ideas.

User avatar
Peter
Guru
Posts: 1304
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:46 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #538

Post by Peter »

kayky wrote: The death and resurrection of Jesus can only be understood in mythic terms as a spiritual path of rebirth. Taken literally, the story makes no sense whatsoever. The very idea that God requires bloodshed in order to be appeased is one of the most primitive of religious ideas.
Right. The war god of the desert is a primitive god invented by primitive men. A child today could invent a better god. Christianity is constantly trying to make a better god by evolving with the times. It's too bad they started out with such a monster. :(
Religion is poison because it asks us to give up our most precious faculty, which is that of reason, and to believe things without evidence. It then asks us to respect this, which it calls faith. - Christopher Hitchens

User avatar
kayky
Prodigy
Posts: 4695
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 9:23 pm
Location: Kentucky

Post #539

Post by kayky »

Peter wrote:
kayky wrote: The death and resurrection of Jesus can only be understood in mythic terms as a spiritual path of rebirth. Taken literally, the story makes no sense whatsoever. The very idea that God requires bloodshed in order to be appeased is one of the most primitive of religious ideas.
Right. The war god of the desert is a primitive god invented by primitive men. A child today could invent a better god. Christianity is constantly trying to make a better god by evolving with the times. It's too bad they started out with such a monster. :(
I think Christianity needs to evolve. Unfortunately, fundamentalism threatens to destroy it instead.

User avatar
Faith Leads to Knowledge
Apprentice
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:15 am

Post #540

Post by Faith Leads to Knowledge »

Standing at the foot of the cross, can help you to make sense of everything. The logic of a man bent on his own survival can not look at the cross without being scandalized. One has to be immersed in love to understand. If your son's or daughters life was at stake,would you suffer the crucifixion to ensure their safety? If the answer is yes, then perhaps some,of this begins to add up.

applying the rational and skeptical test to everything is a miscalculation of the capacities of reason. You become a car salesman if you do so. A laputan. An extremist. Reason is a wondrous thing. But love, love is what will save the world.

I believe that our bewilderment with the cross is more about our own life and whether we are prepared to take it up. From the outset God is instructing man to sacrifice because He knows tatv love can love be kept. Cain asked a similar question to the op when he slayed Abel. God wants man to love the other totally and without a cross it,is simply not possible. For a loving God, the cross is perhaps the most rational conclusion.

Post Reply