Abortion Racism

[jcrawford]

Abortions performed by white male abortionists on the wives of black men in New York State without their knowledge and written consent are racist and genocidal, and should be outlawed. Attorney General Spitzer, Senator Clinton and NYC Mike Bloomberg all support the right of white men to perform abortions on the wives and daughters of married black men without their knowledge, informed consent and written permission. Spitzer, Clinton and Bloomberg are all white racists.

Questions for discussion and debate:

Should black men, particularly Black Muslims and Christians, vote for white racists like the above, or should they demand financial reparations from such white racists, abortionists and their supporters for killing the unborn fetuses of black marriages during the past 30 years in New York State? What right does Bloomberg have to walk around with 4 Billion bucks in his pocket when he has personally justified the right of white male abortionists to indiscriminately slaughter the unborn fetuses of countless married black men without so much as a hoot, damn or care for the reproductive rights and lives of married black men in America?

[jcrawford]

Whats the matter JC? your religious tack wasn't working so you thought throwing in the race card would make it more compelling?

Yes, seeing how white male secular racists don't seem to give a hoot about what religion their victims are members of, maybe pointing out that bloody bloomberg, bloody bill and hill clinton, and "killer" spitzer are all white racists will shake up the governor's race in New York State. Faso has come out for denying Medicaid for abortions in order to save the taxpayers money and black baby "killer" spitzer supports gay marriage, so the racial politics of sex and abortion in NYS are heating up these days.

btw what is a religious abortion?

A religious abortion is like a religious marriage. Both spouses are present and equally represented by a member of the clergy.

No religious abortions, no gay marriage.

[jcrawford]

A woman doesn't need her husband's permission, written or otherwise, to have an abortion. A woman has the right to do with her body as she chooses.

Crapola. A married woman has no more unconditional right to do what she wants with her body than a married man or a homosexual does. What city or state do you live in?

Deal with it already.

I am dealing. Not with your deck of cards, though.

What's it going to take to get this through your thick little skull?

My skull is thicker than a Neanderthal skull. Try a hammer and nail sometime if you've got the nerve.

[jcrawford]

Black Muslims, Christians and Jews have the right to religous abortions if they so choose, just like they have the right to be married according to their religious traditions and vows.

Race and religion have nothing to do with it. Women (any race, any religion) have the right to religious or non-religious abortions, if they so choose.

Married men have the right to be informed whenever some white medicine man or other medical quack is going to practice medical experiments on their wives.

Although, I don't quite understand what a religious abortion is.

Same thing as a religious marriage. Both spouses consent with their clergy's blessings. What's the difference between a white secular abortion and a racist one?

I don't know of any abortion clinic that limits the employment to white male doctors, do you?

Of course not. They are all owned by white racists but can't racially discriminate in employment practices. No married black man owns an abortion clinic in the state of New York. Only secular white racists do.

Why don't you simply state that, "If women have the unconditional choice to get medical abortions, then men have the right to be present in the hospital or medical clinic where their wives are being operated on by abortionists."

Why don't you? Seems like a good idea to me. I'll support it.

Does the removal of race and religion change the rights being demanded?

Of course. Without a racial or religious identity, you only have robot rights.

You have yet to explain why it is that you feel that husbands should have rights over their wive's medical treatment.

Husbands and wives have equal rights to be informed of the medical condition of their spouse.

[jcrawford]

They also have the right to demand a proper Islamic, Christian or Jewish burial for their wives aborted fetus along with clergy representation at the funeral proceedings.

Is this what your ranting is all about? You want to have the religious rites for the aborted fetus. What kind of magic is that?

If I was rude like Cephus, I could say, "none of your damn business." Since I'm not, religious rites for the aborted fetus would consist of whatever religious rites the ex-parents would prefer and their clergy would provide.

If state or private health plans won't pay for religious abortions, why should Black Muslims, Christians and Jews pay taxes to support secular abortions performed only by white male supremacists who favor the idea of homosexual marriages?

Why is the idea of homosexual marriage in any way relevant?

Marriage rights are marriage rights. What do they consist of? The right of non-procreative white men to marry other non-procreative men or the rights of religious men to procreate with their wives? What right do you have to give any other man the right to stick his bloody filthy hands in my wife's vagina? Who gave you that right? I didn't.

Why is the race, gender and alleged prejudice of the abortionist relevant?

Because white men don't have the right to look at the private parts of a black man's wife without his consent any more than a homosexual has the right to commit adultery with a married man.

[Wyvern]

What right do you have to give any other man the right to stick his bloody filthy hands in my wife's vagina? Who gave you that right? I didn't.

Since you have stated before that you have children you gave these men the right to put there hands in your wifes vagina, every time she went thru delivery. In an abortion procedure on the other hand very rarely would that occur, please stop using colorful language in order to make things seem worse than they actually are. (and yes I have personally witnessed a number of both procedures albeit not in a long time)

Because white men don't have the right to look at the private parts of a black man's wife without his consent any more than a homosexual has the right to commit adultery with a married man.

What color is the sky in your world?

[McCulloch]

What right do you have to give any other man the right to stick his bloody filthy hands in my wife's vagina? Who gave you that right? I didn't.
White men don't have the right to look at the private parts of a black man's wife without his consent any more than a homosexual has the right to commit adultery with a married man.

False. If a woman decides to pose for a porno mag, the men who purchase the mag and look at her private parts are not violating her husband's rights.
White men, black men, or chinese women have the right to look at the private parts of a black man's wife if she herself gives them that right.
I can not give any man the right to "stick his bloody filthy hands" in your wife's vagina. But she can.

[jcrawford]

What right do you have to give any other man the right to stick his bloody filthy hands in my wife's vagina? Who gave you that right? I didn't.

Since you have stated before that you have children you gave these men the right to put there hands in your wifes vagina, every time she went thru delivery.

That's right, and only for delivery in a reputable hospital or by a reputable doctor or mid-wife in our home. Home delivery is not restricted to the New York Times, you know. If they wanted to abort the fetus or partially delivered baby, under any circumstances, they would have to get our written consent. Otherwise, my wife and I would sue the hell out of them.

In an abortion procedure on the other hand very rarely would that occur, please stop using colorful language in order to make things seem worse than they actually are.

Sorry. Do you find colorful language or colorful people offensive?

What color is the sky in your world?

It's overcast and clouded by a blot of unwanted black abortions and white abortionists.

[jcrawford]

What right do you have to give any other man the right to stick his bloody filthy hands in my wife's vagina? Who gave you that right? I didn't.
White men don't have the right to look at the private parts of a black man's wife without his consent any more than a homosexual has the right to commit adultery with a married man.

False. If a woman decides to pose for a porno mag, the men who purchase the mag and look at her private parts are not violating her husband's rights.

False. Neither pornographers nor editors of secular newspapers have the right to violate the civil and religous rights of Christian, Jewish and Islamic men and woman.

White men, black men, or chinese women have the right to look at the private parts of a black man's wife if she herself gives them that right.
I can not give any man the right to "stick his bloody filthy hands" in your wife's vagina. But she can.

Maybe under the corrupt laws of your government in Canada, she can. Not in Islamic countries though.

[Cephus]

Crapola. A married woman has no more unconditional right to do what she wants with her body than a married man or a homosexual does. What city or state do you live in?

What, so you need her permission to get a vascectomy? You need her written permission to do *ANYTHING*?

My skull is thicker than a Neanderthal skull. Try a hammer and nail sometime if you've got the nerve.

And apparently, what's inside your skull is little more advanced than a Neanderthal. Maybe you should let us all know when you manage to advance to the level of the 21st century.

[McCulloch]

White men, black men, or chinese women have the right to look at the private parts of a black man's wife if she herself gives them that right.
I can not give any man the right to "stick his bloody filthy hands" in your wife's vagina. But she can.

Maybe under the corrupt laws of your government in Canada, she can. Not in Islamic countries though.

The laws of every western democracy, the USA included, have the same alleged corruption.
Do you honestly think that we should adopt Islamic jurisprudence? Theocracy anyone?