Does the Bible mention incest and if so....

Dedicated to the scholarly study of the bible as text and the discussion thereof

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
barcelonic
Student
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:19 am

Does the Bible mention incest and if so....

Post #1

Post by barcelonic »

How does the Bible then account for the development of the first family of Genesis, into millions of people, without incestuous relationships having occurred?

This one has been bugging me for a while. I brought it up once before in a debate and I was given some answer about Augustine perhaps I'm not sure exactly, but how is the lineage of Adam & Eve explained in the Bible and what does the Bible have to say on the subject of incest?

Any references/examples would be appreciated too, thanks :)

keithprosser3

Post #2

Post by keithprosser3 »

It is impossible to know why the editors of genesis left things in that state rather than putting together a more coherent story, so there is no end of theories.

The one I favor is that the OT is was written specifically for the Hebrews/Jews and ignored non-Hebrews as much as possible. That is to say that Adam and Eve were intended to represent the first Hebrew rather than the first humans, the existence of non-Hebrews being assumed but beneath the notice of the Bible writers, but it is hard to construct anything consistent out of the material.

It is interesting that the bible writers didn't care too much about making their origin myth more logical, and even ended up with two incompatible versions, but as to why that is, well no-one knows and I don't think we ever will.

Incest is certainly mentioned in the Bible. For example, the daughters of Lot produced sons by their own father (on their initiative!), producing the patriarchs of the Moabites and Ammontites, tribes that were traditional enemies of the Hebrew.

Tiberius47
Apprentice
Posts: 188
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 4:57 am

Re: Does the Bible mention incest and if so....

Post #3

Post by Tiberius47 »

barcelonic wrote: How does the Bible then account for the development of the first family of Genesis, into millions of people, without incestuous relationships having occurred?

This one has been bugging me for a while. I brought it up once before in a debate and I was given some answer about Augustine perhaps I'm not sure exactly, but how is the lineage of Adam & Eve explained in the Bible and what does the Bible have to say on the subject of incest?

Any references/examples would be appreciated too, thanks :)
There's a lot of incest in the Bible.

Wikipedia has an article on it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incest_in_the_Bible

User avatar
barcelonic
Student
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:19 am

Post #4

Post by barcelonic »

Wow that's an interesting page thanks :)

So it would seem then that if the Hebrew Bible be the word of God then Leviticus condemning incest within the immediate family would be a contradiction of God's chosen method of creation in Genesis.

But your take on the issue imho doesn't change the fundamentals at all because if we are to assume the first Hebrews were 100% pure Hebrew then the same problem applies. Therefore that would mean at least some of the first Hebrews were of mixed race.... but at this point the question arises - what is a Hebrew? If race is an outdated definition, what does it mean to be the first Hebrew? Surely that person's parents would have given him/her their genetic characteristics just as much as every subsequent Hebrew and also every ancestor of this 'first' Hebrew.

Thanks for your help with this btw :)

keithprosser3

Post #5

Post by keithprosser3 »

If you are interested in anthropology, I don't think the Bible is where to start. That would be like using Rudyard Kipling's Just So stories to learn about evolution.

User avatar
Wootah
Savant
Posts: 9199
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:16 am
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 108 times

Post #6

Post by Wootah »

Hi Barcelonic,

There definitely would have been incest in the growth of humanity from Adam and Eve.

Genetically speaking the issue with incest is that if you have a bad gene and your sibling has a bad gene the chance of that gene being promoted is greatly increased. There were no bad genes at the start of creation and bad genes would have started happening after the fall.

The stigma of incest most likely, biologically, comes from the above and the necessity of making a law of it is more likely to enforce the reality that incest is biologically bad in a fallen world.

The commandment against incest (and this can be generalised to basically all of the law) is in response to the fallen nature of the world and therefore not a contradiction with the original state but a response to the fallen state.

puddleglum
Sage
Posts: 685
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 12:35 pm
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Post #7

Post by puddleglum »

[Replying to post 6 by Wootah]

This is an excellent explanation of the subject. Here is an article that gives more information on the subject.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-ans ... e-campaign
His invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made.
Romans 1:20 ESV

keithprosser3

Post #8

Post by keithprosser3 »

I can summarise the above article as 'he married a relative - either a sister or a niece - that is not actually mentioned anywhere. One worries what else is not mentioned in the Bible.

I you have time click here for an alternative view.

keithprosser3

Post #9

Post by keithprosser3 »

I meant here

User avatar
barcelonic
Student
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:19 am

Post #10

Post by barcelonic »

Wootah wrote: The commandment against incest (and this can be generalised to basically all of the law) is in response to the fallen nature of the world and therefore not a contradiction with the original state but a response to the fallen state.
So where does it suggest this in the Bible?

Remember I'm only looking for what the Bible has to say; not people's modern interpretations regarding genes.

Post Reply