tam wrote:
Peace to you!
2timothy316 wrote:
JehovahsWitness wrote:
showme wrote: Plus the JW have the mark of the beast, which precludes ruling with "Christ" (Revelation 20:4).
What do you mean Jehovah's Witnesses have "the mark of the beast"? I'm one of Jehovah's Witnesses, are you saying I have "the mark of the beast", what do you mean by that?
I think someone doesn't know what 'beasts' represent in the Bible. They don't represent religions. They represent governments.
The beasts (and the seven heads) actually do represent religions.
Incorrect. The harlot and the wild best are two separate things. I think you're confused because right now they are working so closely together. They sometimes speak for each other saying the same things. Yet we don't have speculate on such things, the Bible tells us which is which.
"And I saw a wild beast ascending out of the sea, with ten horns and seven heads, and on its horns ten diadems, but on its heads blasphemous names. Now the wild beast that I saw was like a leopard, but its feet were like those of a bear, and its mouth was like a lion’s mouth. And the dragon gave to the beast its power and its throne and great authority." Rev 13:1, 2
Compare
"And I saw three unclean inspired expressions that looked like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon and out of the mouth of the wild beast and out of the mouth of the false prophet. They are, in fact, expressions inspired by demons and they perform signs, and they go out to the kings of the entire inhabited earth, to gather them together to the war of the great day of God the Almighty." Rev 16:13, 14
The dragon, the wild beast and the false prophet (the harlot) are all speaking unclean expressions yet they are different things.
In many instances other nations or cities are referred to as feminine or as women. A few are: Moab (Jer 48:41), Egypt (Jer 46:11), Rabbah of Ammon (Jer 49:2), Babylon (Jer 51:13), and symbolic Babylon the Great.​—Re 17:1-6;
The Wild Beasts of Daniel and of Revelation. Beasts described in these books represent political kingdoms or governments, exercising rulership and authority, is clearly stated. (Da 7:6, 12, 23; 8:20-22; Re 16:10; 17:3, 9-12) All the beasts are represented as very aggressive, seeking the dominant position over the nations or peoples within the reach of their power.​—Compare Da 7:17, 18, 21; 8:9-11, 23, 24; Re 13:4-7, 15; 17:12-14.
Women = People as in a whole nation, a religion or even city but lack authority of a king or ruler.
Beast = Political systems and rulers with authority.
Authority is what makes them different and that will be clear when the best turns on the harlot. "And the ten horns that you saw and the wild beast, these will hate the prostitute and will make her devastated and naked, and they will eat up her flesh and completely burn her with fire." Rev 17:16.
If Religion is the beast then what is religion eating and burning with fire? Governments? Itself? So saying, 'The beasts actually do represent religions.' makes zero sense.