alwayson wrote:
Mithrae wrote:
I can't help but noticing that you have failed to address post #3 in which the numerous problems with that supposition have been detailed.
Your personal lack of knowledge, doesn't mean there are problems with the theory.
The LXX version of Zechariah does says rising.
See page 22 and 190 of
The Zechariah Tradition and the Gospel of Matthew By Charlene McAfee Moss.
No it doesn't. The Hebrew original says Branch, and I showed you
two different LXX translations which agree with that (saying Branch and Shoot respectively). I also showed you that the 'Branch' in the passage is not Jesus the son of Jehozadak, since the passage refers to two individuals (6:13) and the one who Zechariah had
already described as building the house of the Lord is Zerubbabel (4:8-9). Furthermore, I even showed how the 'Branch' terminology is therefore an allusion to Isaiah 11:1, that in Zechariah's mind Zerubbabel the descendant of David was the "shoot from the stump of Jesse."
You initially claimed that
Paul derived his view of Jesus from Zechariah (despite using a completely different word for Satan, as I also showed) and yet your source is about the gospel of Matthew. Whatever Matthew did with his story of Jesus - and certainly he more than any other evangelist did try to create parallels with passages from the Tanakh - is irrelevant to the earlier information from Mark, Paul and so on.
Thankyou for providing your source; we can rest easy knowing that the problem with your claims probably lies more with how you are choosing to describe it than with the scholar herself