Atrocities of God

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

liamconnor
Prodigy
Posts: 3170
Joined: Sun May 31, 2015 1:18 pm

Atrocities of God

Post #1

Post by liamconnor »

Much talk has been made on the morality of God; for instance:
JW and others calling themselves 'Christian' have advanced the argument that since God created the world and human beings, if he tortures, kills, or rapes his creatures; or tells people to do it, this is not evil because God created them and their world.
But I have seen few biblical references. Here is a chance to present individual cases for discussion. Please present the passage, with book, chapter, and verse.

As a preliminary, I argue that the majority of the Psalms are not a legitimate source for the morality of God; they are written from the human perspective alone. We have no indication in them that when the psalmist looked forward to a day when Babylonian babies would be bashed against rocks, the God of the bible approved. For his moral standards, we need to look to the law and portions of the Bible where God is said to speak for himself (the prophets; histories).

Secondly, I for one recall no instances in which God demands the torture of anyone, nor does he rape anyone. Torture is the intention to prolong pain; even in cases of stoning (from what I have heard, a pretty quick execution) we have no command to allow the victim to recover so the treatment can be repeated. Rape involves physical penetration and the absence of consent; neither obtain in the case of Mary.

User avatar
Tired of the Nonsense
Site Supporter
Posts: 5680
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:01 pm
Location: USA
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #21

Post by Tired of the Nonsense »

Mr. Conner has yet to respond. I submit that this is because the answer to his question has been provided.
Image "The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this." -- Albert Einstein -- Written in 1954 to Jewish philosopher Erik Gutkind.

User avatar
Danmark
Site Supporter
Posts: 12697
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:58 am
Location: Seattle
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #22

Post by Danmark »

Tired of the Nonsense wrote: Mr. Conner has yet to respond. I submit that this is because the answer to his question has been provided.
A question remains from the OP, one that I missed if it has been addressed. It involves this, from the OP:
I argue that the majority of the Psalms are not a legitimate source for the morality of God; they are written from the human perspective alone. We have no indication in them that when the psalmist looked forward to a day when Babylonian babies would be bashed against rocks, the God of the bible approved. For his moral standards, we need to look to the law and portions of the Bible where God is said to speak for himself (the prophets; histories).
Tho' I agree the Psalms are written from the human author's POV, why then are they considered scripture at all if they do not come from God? Herein lies a dilemma for the 'Bible Believer.' Either the believer accepts what is written, warts and all, or the authority of scripture is lost.

Additionally, the prophets, the histories, the Pentateuch, are ALL written by men, but accorded the status of 'scripture' because supposedly they are written with 'divine inspiration.' Why give the Psalms a different status?
In any event, in addition to the Psalms, horrifically immoral stances have been attributed to this God by the various authors.

DanieltheDragon
Savant
Posts: 6224
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
Location: Charlotte
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #23

Post by DanieltheDragon »

[Replying to post 16 by Hawkins]


:warning: Moderator Warning


Calling people on this forum murderers is against the sites rules on personal attacks and civil debate.
Please review our Rules.

______________

Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
Post 1: Wed Apr 01, 2015 10:48 am Otseng has been banned
Otseng has been banned for having multiple accounts and impersonating a moderator.

User avatar
marco
Savant
Posts: 12314
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: Scotland
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #24

Post by marco »

bjs wrote:
Mithrae wrote: > God drowning every living thing on the planet - not the worst but hardly the nicest way to die - save eight humans and two of "every animal"
I have never understood this argument.
There is nothing much to understand: a being destroys almost all humankind by a deliberate act. That would normally be termed murder. If someone dies of old age or from cancer or from an accident, the murderous being wasn't involved.

However, if you are crediting God with causing the deaths of all humans by inventing a whole variety of murderous means, then the original charge of brutality stands, through this admission. Usually, we criticise him only for the murders he has admitted.

User avatar
amortalman
Site Supporter
Posts: 577
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 9:35 am
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 30 times

Re: Atrocities of God

Post #25

Post by amortalman »

[Replying to post 1 by liamconnor]

I would like to refer to the last part of your comment where you state,"Secondly, I for one recall no instances in which God demands the torture of anyone, nor does he rape anyone."

God was, in fact, complicit in the crime of rape against the women of his own chosen people as recorded in Zachariah 14:1-2:

Lo, a day shall come for the Lord when the spoils shall be divided in your midst. And I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem for battle: the city shall be taken, houses plundered, women ravished; half of the city shall go into exile, but the rest of the people shall not be removed from the city. (Zechariah 14:1-2 NAB)

The women of Jerusalem were ravished (raped) by Israel's enemies with the wholehearted approval of God. Of course, this was not an isolated incident. Women were treated as the property of their fathers or husbands, sold as slaves, taken as spoils of war (but only the young virgins, the grown men, and women were slaughtered) all with a nod from their male God. But don't fret. After all, it's only fiction, as nasty as it is.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #26

Post by ttruscott »

marco wrote:
bjs wrote:
Mithrae wrote: > God drowning every living thing on the planet - not the worst but hardly the nicest way to die - save eight humans and two of "every animal"
I have never understood this argument.
There is nothing much to understand: a being destroys almost all humankind by a deliberate act. That would normally be termed murder.
...unless it was by the legal and just sentence of a proper Judge. Executions are not murder.
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

User avatar
Danmark
Site Supporter
Posts: 12697
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:58 am
Location: Seattle
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #27

Post by Danmark »

[Replying to post 26 by ttruscott]
We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.
This is the most fantastic, utterly ridiculous idea I've ever heard of. You continue to trot this nonsense out again and again, but you have ZERO support for it. Nothing in the Bible or in nature supports such a fantasy. There's as much support for this claim as there is for "Thetans" and and "Xenu" from Scientology.

Hubbard wrote that Xenu was the ruler of a Galactic Confederacy 75 million years ago, which consisted of 26 stars and 76 planets including Earth, which was then known as "Teegeeack".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenu

You might as well be talking about a galactic bunny rabbit. :) I believe you have previously said, Ted, that NO ONE shares your belief. No one.

User avatar
wiploc
Guru
Posts: 1423
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 12:26 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Atrocities of God

Post #28

Post by wiploc »

liamconnor wrote:
... since God created the world and human beings, if he tortures, kills, or rapes his creatures; or tells people to do it, this is not evil because God created them and their world.
Who made that rule? Not a good god.

Post Reply