Atheism people misuse “science" as their weapon against religion.
Do they, please?
Regards
_________________
One may like to read Post 5 from friend JP Cusick in the thread: "If everything is happening automatic because of Evolution" forum Debating Christianity and Religion Forum Index -> Random Ramblings
Atheism misuse “science" as their weapon against reli
Moderator: Moderators
-
paarsurrey1
- Sage
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2017 3:19 pm
-
DrNoGods
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2716
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:18 pm
- Location: Nevada
- Has thanked: 593 times
- Been thanked: 1642 times
Post #21
[Replying to post 19 by Aetixintro]
Can you reference some examples of any valid demonstrations that telepathy, reincarnation and regeneration (or any one of these) are real? To my knowledge there are no such demonstrations, or any reason to believe that these things are real in any way. They exist in the imagination only.
Are you suggesting that atheists have no morality? Morality does not come from religion. It is innate in social animals of all types, and you can just look at extremist muslims to see one present-day example of how far some religious believers will go with their lack of morality. You don't seem to understand what atheism is, or what morality is, based on your comments.
When in fact there is now good ways to document telepathy and reincarnation and regeneration, it suggests we look at the claims of (dishonest) Atheism again or anew.
Can you reference some examples of any valid demonstrations that telepathy, reincarnation and regeneration (or any one of these) are real? To my knowledge there are no such demonstrations, or any reason to believe that these things are real in any way. They exist in the imagination only.
... but also due to superior morality to those who evidently don't care for morality at all.
Are you suggesting that atheists have no morality? Morality does not come from religion. It is innate in social animals of all types, and you can just look at extremist muslims to see one present-day example of how far some religious believers will go with their lack of morality. You don't seem to understand what atheism is, or what morality is, based on your comments.
In human affairs the sources of success are ever to be found in the fountains of quick resolve and swift stroke; and it seems to be a law, inflexible and inexorable, that he who will not risk cannot win.
John Paul Jones, 1779
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.
Mark Twain
John Paul Jones, 1779
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.
Mark Twain
Post #22
[Replying to post 17 by DeMotts]
"This is assuming a literal interpretation of the bible of course. If you want to just take it all figuratively as a bunch of stories and just believe that an all-powerful entity watches you and listens to you pray and stuff then nobody here can disprove you, they just won't be convinced of anything without some type of proof."
We are born here on this earth and live long enough in order to find a 'proof'
for ourselves.
One's 'proof' dos not fit all personalities and backgrounds etc etc.
Besides, we are on the brink of ww3 without any proof and it does not seem to bother them.
"This is assuming a literal interpretation of the bible of course. If you want to just take it all figuratively as a bunch of stories and just believe that an all-powerful entity watches you and listens to you pray and stuff then nobody here can disprove you, they just won't be convinced of anything without some type of proof."
We are born here on this earth and live long enough in order to find a 'proof'
for ourselves.
One's 'proof' dos not fit all personalities and backgrounds etc etc.
Besides, we are on the brink of ww3 without any proof and it does not seem to bother them.
-
DeMotts
- Scholar
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 1:58 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 22 times
Post #23
Well since this is a science forum I'm of course referring to some sort of scientific proof, like an experiment that can be reproduced reliably. I think it's fair to say that's the standard of proof that would convince the majority of the skeptics on this board. But you're right of course, "proof" can mean different things for different people. Look at the amount of people convinced that the earth is flat or the moon landing was faked - all from watching poorly produced youtube videos for a few hours.Monta wrote: "This is assuming a literal interpretation of the bible of course. If you want to just take it all figuratively as a bunch of stories and just believe that an all-powerful entity watches you and listens to you pray and stuff then nobody here can disprove you, they just won't be convinced of anything without some type of proof."
We are born here on this earth and live long enough in order to find a 'proof'
for ourselves.
One's 'proof' dos not fit all personalities and backgrounds etc etc.
Besides, we are on the brink of ww3 without any proof and it does not seem to bother them.
Fortunately the standards of proof for the scientific community are more rigorous - otherwise none of our medicine, electronics, telecommunications, nuclear power plants, spacecraft etc would work properly.
-
brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6002
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6623 times
- Been thanked: 3219 times
Post #24
[Replying to post 19 by Aetixintro]
Atheism has nothing to say about telepathy, reincarnation or regeneration. It is simply a lack of belief in gods.When in fact there is now good ways to document telepathy and reincarnation and regeneration, it suggests we look at the claims of (dishonest) Atheism again or anew.
