PinSeeker wrote:
onewithhim wrote:
Please accept my apology. I was not thinking of you when I said that.
Apology accepted. I think you were thinking of me, though; it seems rather obvious.
onewithhim wrote:
I have given many thoughtful comments and asked you to weigh in on the subject and often you don't do that. If I'm wrong, I will retract my statement, but I think I've asked you to explain some things which just got swept under the carpet....but perhaps it was someone else.
I don't "sweep anything under the carpet." There just comes a point that retreading the same ground(s) over and over again in the hope that a different answer will be obtained becomes a waste of time. But, patience is part of the fruit of the Holy Spirit, so I would continue in it; you may have posed something(s) that I missed. If so, pose again if you like.
onewithhim wrote:
Anyway, how have I thought "very wrongly" about what we have discussed?
I believe I've been very clear in this thread and others on that question. In my memory, there has not been much at all that we have discussed that we haven't disagreed on. But that's the nature of this forum; it is a debate forum, after all. It there weren't disagreement, there would be no discussion to be had on this site, right?
The name of Jesus is certainly matchless among men and angels. His Father's name is above ALL...
Ah we're back to the misunderstanding among JWs regarding Philippians 2, particulary -- in this case -- verses 9 through 11:
- "...God highly exalted (Jesus), and bestowed on Him the name which is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee will bow, of those who are in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and that every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father." [Philippians 2:9-11]
This should
not be interpreted to mean that at one time in eternity past Jesus did not possess the name which is above every name (such an interpretation would be a mangling of the Holy Spirit's message through Paul here and elsewhere), but only -- in the context of the passage -- the name above all names was bestowed on Him in His form (morphe', nature) as carnal man (which He affirmed in John 8:58), a period of approximately 33 years (from His conception to His death on the cross).
onewithhim wrote:
...however, and I think Jehovah should be recognized.
As do I. This is done also in recognizing and acknowledging Jesus for Who He is,
Grace and peace to you.[/quote]
ONEWITHHIM RESPONDS
1) Why was it "obvious" that I meant that comment for you? I told you why I said it. I go from door-to-door in the ministry and speak to dozens of people, and probably the majority of them don't care to even listen. I think I posted my opinion of why they don't want to.
2) True, it is a debate site. I thought, that since you were strong in your statement that I was thinking "very wrongly," that you had one or two things in particular in mind.
3) I wouldn't ever say that Jesus' name was not higher than all men and angels' before he died and went back to heaven. I don't understand your point.
4) I agree that we have to recognize Jesus for who he is. The Father said that we must accept His Son and what he did for mankind. If we don't, we answer to Him, Jehovah. As the Apostle John said:
"These things have been written down so that you may believe that
Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and because of believing, you may have life by means of his name." (John 20:31)
What do we have to believe? That Jesus is the Son of God. Not God.
.