Members are refusing to answer questions.

Feedback and site usage questions

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Jagella
Banned
Banned
Posts: 3667
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:01 am
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Members are refusing to answer questions.

Post #1

Post by Jagella »

I understand that in the apologetics subsection of this forum we are to include a question for debate if we start a new thread. I always post a question for debate in all of my OPs. The problem I encounter so often is that many if not most of the people who reply to the OP refuse to answer the question for debate. For that matter, many members refuse to answer any of my questions.

So I propose that the moderators crack down on the practice of dodging the question for debate.

User avatar
Jagella
Banned
Banned
Posts: 3667
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:01 am
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Post #11

Post by Jagella »

Wootah wrote:I find some solace in the fact that God notices everything.
If he would do something about the question dodging, then maybe I wouldn't be such an atheist.

But Jesus dodged questions too. Consider Matthew 22:17-19 New Revised Standard Version (NRSV):
"...Tell us, then, what you think. Is it lawful to pay taxes to the emperor, or not?� But Jesus, aware of their malice, said, “Why are you putting me to the test, you hypocrites?"
So question-dodging is an age-old tradition in Christianity.

User avatar
Peds nurse
Site Supporter
Posts: 2270
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:27 am
Been thanked: 9 times

Post #12

Post by Peds nurse »

Jagella wrote:But I remember you telling me you were too busy to address some issues I raised and then were engaging in debate on other threads.
That doesn't mean I was dodging a question, it means that I didn't reply for the amount of time I had available. Some questions take more time to clarify and answer than others do.
It would be VERY difficult to enforce someone to answer questions, both for moderators as well as the people who happen to enjoy the forum.
Jagella wrote:I'm not sure why asking members to answer questions would be so difficult. I've seen many live debates in which the interlocutors ask questions and the moderator intervenes to make sure those questions are answered properly.
I understand your point, I really do. It is difficult to progress in debate when no one answers you, but neither can you enforce the issue. Like Otseng said, the moderators are already busy enough, so adding that to their plate wouldn't be exactly fair, since their time is voluntary.

Carry on, and I thank you for taking time to address my post!

User avatar
Jagella
Banned
Banned
Posts: 3667
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:01 am
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Post #13

Post by Jagella »

otseng wrote: Do you think we get paid to do this? All the mods here are on a volunteer basis. There's no way we'd have the time or energy or motivation or even ability to make sure people answer questions correctly. Simply enforcing the rules we have in place is a hard enough job.
I'm just asking a question. I assumed this Comments, Suggestions, and Questions subsection is for asking questions. It appears that questions are anathema in this forum. :(

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20499
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 197 times
Been thanked: 335 times
Contact:

Post #14

Post by otseng »

Jagella wrote:
otseng wrote: Do you think we get paid to do this? All the mods here are on a volunteer basis. There's no way we'd have the time or energy or motivation or even ability to make sure people answer questions correctly. Simply enforcing the rules we have in place is a hard enough job.
I'm just asking a question. I assumed this Comments, Suggestions, and Questions subsection is for asking questions. It appears that questions are anathema in this forum. :(
Sorry if it appeared I'm jumping on you for simply asking a question. That was not the intention.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #15

Post by ttruscott »

OnceConvinced wrote: Is there a rule that states all questions must be answered?
No there is not and neither is there a rule that anyone must answer condescending and snide* 'questions' that often seems to be merely a disguised superior attitude instructing gullible and deficient people...

Nor is there any rule that sophist quibbling over the minutiae of meaning of one word over another in support of a clear straw man stubbornness need be addressed...Swine, dust and sandals time.

*snide; derogatory or mocking in an indirect way.
synonyms: disparaging, derogatory, deprecating, deprecatory, denigratory, insulting, vituperative, disapproving, contemptuous;

Questions are ingnored for lots of reasons....
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

Post Reply