Unfortunately, []afterlife has been shown to be anything other than theoretical / hypothetical (or wishful thinking, religious propaganda, opinion, etc)
First, let’s get the quote right and complete AND without changing its meaning.
Unfortunately, neither objective morality nor afterlife has been shown to be anything other than theoretical / hypothetical (or wishful thinking, religious propaganda, opinion, etc)
Notice that words in red are critical to the statement
Guy Threepwood wrote:
We strive to preserve our creations, memories, experiences, lessons learned to the extent we can, so that our efforts are not in vain
We can leave what we write, build (and perhaps what we influence). We may remain in the memory of others for a time.
Guy Threepwood wrote:
Why do you think God would choose to discard them?
I do not pretend to know what any of the proposed ‘gods’ would choose
Guy Threepwood wrote:
Why would that be a logical default assumption?
I see no logic at all in making assumptions about ‘gods’ – much less, ‘default assumption’
.
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
You still have not answered what the third thing is that is the standard you use to judge between different human views of morality or argued why a third thing is not needed. Do you have a further response to that?
You still have not answered what the third thing is that is the standard you use to judge between "human morality" and "evil sky fairy morality" or argued why a third thing is not needed. Do you have a further response to that?